Main Article Content

María de los Ángeles Cano Cambronero
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Spain
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-6336
Biography
Matías Jaque Hidalgo
Universidad de Chile
Chile
Biography
Vol 48 (2021), Articles
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/verba.48.6517
Submitted: 08-01-2020 Accepted: 22-02-2020 Published: 29-10-2021
Copyright How to Cite

Abstract

he aim of this paper is to account for the impact that lexical and syntactic aspect has on two Spanish derivational processes. Specifically, we focus on the deverbal derivation of –nte adjectives and –ncia nominals, in order to show that the different productivity that they exhibit can be explained as a restriction on the structural domain of application to which both suffixes are sensitive. Thus, we are going to contend throughout this paper that these suffixes are sensitive not only to the aspect of the verbal source but also to the syntactico–structural level in which that aspect is encoded. Indeed, while –nte can be joined to certain syntactically (external) derived stative predicates, –ncia is restricted to the vP domain, showing a strong preference for lexical states and it never takes as verbal base or source aspectual readings formed above vP.

Cited by

Article Details

References

ALEXIADOU, A. (2001): Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and Ergativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.42.

ALEXIADOU, A. (2009): “On the role of syntactic locality in morphological processes: the case of (Greek) derived nominals”, en A. GIANNAKIDOU & M. RATHERT (eds.): Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 253-280.

ALEXIADOU, A. (2011): “The aspectual properties of nominalization structures”, en A. GALANI, G. HICKS & G. TSOULAS (eds.): Morphology and its interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 195-220.

https://doi.org/10.1075/la.178.11ale.

ALEXIADOU, A. (2012): “Statives and nominalization”, Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 40, pp. 25-52.

https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.1991.

ALEXIADOU, A. & GRIMSHAW, J. (2008): “Verbs, nouns and affixation”, en F. SCHÄFER (ed.): SinSpeC (1): Working Papers of the SFB 732. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart, pp. 1-16.

ALEXIADOU, A., IORDĂCHIOAIA, G. & SCHÄFER, F. (2011): “Scaling the variation in Romance and Germanic Nominalizations”, en P. SLEEMAN & H. PERRIDON (eds.): The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic. Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins, pp. 25-40.https://doi.org/10.1075/la.171.04ale.

ALEXIADOU, A., IORDĂCHIOAIA, G. & SOARE, E. (2010): “Number/Aspect interactions in the syntax of nominalizations: a distributed morphology approach”, Journal of Linguistics 46, pp. 537-574.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226710000058.

ALEXIADOU, A. & SCHÄFER, F. (2010): “On the syntax of episodic vs. dispositional –er nominals”, en A. ALEXIADOU & M. RATHERT (eds.): The Syntax of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 9-38. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245875.9.

ALEXIADOU, A., IORDĂCHIOAIA, G., CANO, M.ª A., MARTIN, F. & SCHÄFER, F. (2013): “The realization of external arguments in derived nominals”, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 16. Springer, pp. 73-95.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-014-9062-x.

ARONOFF, M. (1976): Word formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.

BACH, E. (1986): “The algebra of events”, Linguistics and Philosophy 3, pp. 5-16.

BORER, H. (2003): “Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanation: Syntactic projection and the lexicon”, en J. MOOR & M. POLINSKY (eds.): The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 31-67.

BORER, H. (2005a): Structuring Sense, Vol. I: In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001.

BORER, H. (2005b): Structuring Sense, Vol. II: The Normal Course of Event. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001.

BORER, H. (2012): “In the Event of a Nominal”, en M. EVERAERT, M. MARELJ & T. SILONI (eds.): The Theta System: Argument Structure in the Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 103-150.

BORER, H. (2013): Structuring Sense, Vol. III: Taking form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001.

CANO, M.ª A. (2013): Las derivaciones en –nte y –dor: Estructura argumental y complejidad sintáctica en una morfología neoconstruccionista. Tesis Doctoral. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

CARLSON, G. (2012): “Habitual and Generic Aspect”, en I. ROBERT BINNICK (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 828-851. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381979.013.0029.

CHOMSKY, N. (2001): “Derivation by Phase”, en M. KENSTOWICZ (ed.): Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 1-52.

CINQUE, G. (1999): Adverbs and Functional Heads. New York: Oxford University Press.

CORNILESCU, A. (2001): “Romanian Nominalizations: Case and Aspectual Structure”, Journal of Linguistics 37:3, pp. 467-501. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226701001074.

DAHL, O. (1985): Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.

DE BELDER, M. & VAN CRAENENBROECK, J. (2015): “How to merge a root”, Linguistic Inquiry 46(4), pp. 625-655.

https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00196.

DE MIGUEL, E. (1996): “Nominal Infinitives in Spanish: An Aspectual Constraint”, Canadian Journal of Linguistics 41:1, pp. 29-54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100020247

DE MIGUEL, E. (1999): “El aspecto léxico”, en I. BOSQUE & V. DEMONTE (dirs.): Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, v. 2, cap. 46. Madrid: Espasa- Calpe, pp. 2977-3059.

DLE = REAL ACADEMIA ESPAÑOLA: Diccionario de la lengua española, 23.ª ed., [versión 23.4 en línea]. <https://dle.rae.es>

EMBICK, D. & R. NOYER (2007): “Distributed Morphology and the Syntax-Morphology Interface”, en G. RAMCHAND & C. REIS (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 289-324. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0010.

FÁBREGAS, A. (2010): “A syntactic account of affix rivalry in Spanish nominalizations”, en A. ALEXIADOU & M. RATHERT (eds.): The syntax of nominalizations across languages and frameworks. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 67-92. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245875.67.

FÁBREGAS, A. (2014): “Argument structure and morphologically underived nouns in Spanish and English”, Lingua 141, pp.97-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.02.011.

FÁBREGAS, A. (2016): Las nominalizaciones. Madrid: Visor.

FÁBREGAS, A. & MARÍN, R. (2012): “The role of Aktionsart in deverbal nouns: State nominalizations across languages”, Journal of Linguistics 48, pp 35-70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226711000351.

FERNÁNDEZ LEBORANS, M. & SÁNCHEZ, C. (2015): “On events that express properties”, en E. BARRAJÓN, J. CIFUENTES & S. RODRÍGUEZ (eds.): Verb classes and aspect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 238-263. https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.9.11fer.

FELÍU, E. (2012): “La formación de nombres de lugar en –dero en español actual”, en E. BERNAL, C. SINNER & M. EMSEL (eds.): Tiempo y espacio en la formación de palabras en español. Munich: Peniope, pp. 123-137.

FUNDÉU RAE. “Buscador urgente de dudas”, https://www.fundeu.es/ [10.12.2008]

GRIMSHAW, J. (1990): Argument Structure, Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 18. Cambridge: MIT Press.

HALLMAN, P. (2010): “Instants and intervals in the event/state distinction”. Ms. UCLA.

HARLEY, H. (2009): “The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP”, en M. RATHERT & A. GIANNADIKOU (eds.): Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 321-343.

HARLEY, H. (2012): “Lexical decomposition in modern syntactic theory”, en W. HINZEN, E. MACHERY & M. WERNING (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 328-350. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.013.0015.

HORNO CHÉLIZ, M. (2011): “Argumento eventivo, estados léxicos y enunciados estativos”, en A. CARRASCO (ed.): Sobre estados y estatividad. Munich: LINCOM, pp. 63-82.

JAQUE, M. (2014): La expresión de la estatividad en español: niveles de representación y grados de dinamicidad. Tesis Doctoral. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

JAQUE, M. (2016): “Relaciones entre aspecto y modalidad epistémica: algunas consecuencias de las restricciones temporales sobre la evaluación de predicados”, Onomázein 33, pp. 130-155. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.33.6.

JAQUE, M. & MARTÍN GARCÍA, J. (2012): “Configurational constraints on noneventive nominalizations in Spanish”, Norlyd 39.1, special issue, K. BENTZEN & A. FÁBREGAS (eds.): The Grammar of Objects. Tromsoe: University of Tromsø, pp. 113-140. https://doi.org/10.7557/12.2290.

KATZ, G. (2000): “Anti neo-Davidsonianism: against a Davidsonian semantics for state sentences”, en J. PUSTEJOVSKY & C. TENNY (eds.): Events as Grammatical Objects. The converging perspectives of lexical semantics and syntax. Standford: CSLI, pp. 393-416.

KRATZER, A. (1996): “Severing the External Argument from its Verb”, en J. ROORYCK & L. ZARING (eds.): Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 109-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5.

LANG, M. (1992): Formación de palabras en español. Madrid: Cátedra.

LEKAKOU, M. (2005): In the Middle, Somewhat Elevated. The semantics of middles and its crosslinguistic realization. PhD Dissertation: University of London.

LUNDQUIST, B. (2012): “Localizing cross-linguistic variation in Tense systems: on telicity and stativity in Swedish and English”, Nordic Journal of Linguistics 35(1), pp. 27-70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S033258651200011X.

MAIENBORN, C. (2005): “On the limits of The Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences”, Theoretical Linguistics 31, pp. 275-316. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2005.31.3.275.

MARANTZ, A. (1997): “No Escape from syntax. Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon”, UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics 4, pp. 201-225.

MARANTZ, A. (2014): “Locality Domains for Contextual Allomorphy across the Interfaces”, en O. MATUSHANSKY & A. MARANTZ (eds.): Distributed Morphology Today: Morphemes for Morris Halle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 95-116. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262019675.003.0006.

MARCHIS, M. (2008): “The internal structure of the –or nominalization in Romanian”, en F. SCHÄFER (ed.): Working Papers of the SFB 732 Incremental Specification in Context. Stuttgart, pp. 103-117.

MARÍN, R. (2013): La stativité dans tous ses états. Memoire de Habilitation, Lille, France.

MARTIN, F. (2008): Les prédicats statifs. Étude sémantique et pragmatique. Paris/Bruxelles: Duculot/De Boeck. https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.marti.2008.01.

MARTÍN GARCÍA, J. (2011): “Deverbal nouns with the suffix –dura”, en J. L. CIFUENTES & S. RODRÍGUEZ (eds.): Spanish Word Formation and Lexical Creation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 165-183. https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.1.07gar.

NARROG, H. (2012): Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001.

NGLE = REAL ACADEMIA ESPAÑOLA Y ASOCIACIÓN DE ACADEMIAS DE LA LENGUA ESPAÑOLA (2009): Nueva Gramática de la Real Academia de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa.

OLTRA-MASSUET, I. (1999): “On the Constituent Structure of Catalan Verbs”, en K. ARREGI, B. BRUENING, C. KRAUSE & V. LIN (eds.): MITWPL 33: Papers in Morphology and Syntax, Cycle One. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, pp. 279-322.

OLTRA-MASSUET, I. (2010): On the morphology of complex adjectives. Tesis Doctoral. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma of Barcelona.

OLTRA-MASSUET, I. (2014): Deverbal Adjectives at the Interface: A Crosslinguistic Investigation into the Morphology, Syntax and Semantics of -ble. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614510659.

OLTRA-MASSUET, I. & ARREGI, K. (2005): “Stress-by-Structure in Spanish”, Linguistic Inquiry 36(1), pp. 43-84. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993637.

PARSONS, T. (1990): Events in the Semantics of English. Cambridge: MIT Press.

PHARIES, D. (2002): Diccionario etimológico de los sufijos españoles y de otros elementos finales. Madrid: Gredos.

RAMCHAND, G. (2008): Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319.

RAMCHAND, G. (2018): Situations and Syntactic Structures. Rethinking Auxiliaries and Order in English. Cambridge: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262037754.001.0001.

RAMCHAND, G. & SVENONIUS, P. (2014): “Deriving the functional hierarchy”, Language Sciences 46, pp. 152-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.013.

ROTHMAYR, A. (2009): The Structure of Stative Verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.143.

ROY, I. (2013): Nonverbal Predication. Copular Sentences at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543540.001.0001.

ROY, I. & SOARE, E. (2012): “L’enquêteur, le surveillant et le détenu: les noms déverbaux de participants aux événements, lectures événementielles et structure argumentale”, en R. MARÍN & F. VILLOING (eds.): Lexique 20: Nouveaux aspects sur les Nominalisations. Presses Universitaires du Septentrion: Villeneuve d’Ascq, pp. 207-231.

SANTIAGO, R. & BUSTOS. E. (1999): “La derivación nominal”, en I. BOSQUE & V. DEMONTE (dirs.): Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, vol. 3, cap. 69. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, pp. 4505-4590.

SCHEINER, J. M. (2002): “Temporal anchoring of habituals”, en M. VAN KOPPEN, J. SIO & M. DE VOS (eds.): Proceedings of ConSole XI. The Netherland: Leiden University. Recuperado de https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/binaries/content/assets/geesteswetenschappen/lucl/sole/console-xi.pdf [02.01.2020]

SICHEL, I. (2010): “Event-structure constraints on nominalizations”, en A. ALEXIADOU & M. RATHERT (eds.): The syntax of nominalizations across languages and frameworks. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 159-198. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245875.159.

SOTO, G. (2008): “Sobre el llamado futuro de probabilidad. Algunas condiciones del valor modal de –ré”, Boletín de Filología Tomo XLIII, pp. 193-206.

VARELA, S. (2012): “La interacción de las nominalizaciones con la voz, el aspecto y la dimensión temporal”, en E. BERNAL, C. SINNER & M. EMSEL (eds.): Tiempo y espacio en la formación de palabras en español. Munich: Peniope, pp. 91-106.

VERKUYL, H. (1993): A Theory of Aspectuality: The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597848.

WILTSCHKO, M. (2014): The universal structure of categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139833899.