Main Article Content

José Cajide Val
Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
Spain
No 34 (2024): 50 Aniversario dos Estudos de Pedagoxía en Galicia (1974-2024), Works by invitation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/ie.34.10166
Submitted: 02-10-2024 Accepted: 02-10-2024 Published: 29-11-2024
Copyright How to Cite

Abstract

This work is limited to a reflection on quantitative and qualitative research based more on contextual parameters of both approaches than on reflections deduced from a group of particular studies. Today's society is global, interactive and in continuous technological advancement. Therefore, researchers will be conditioned when choosing one or another paradigm by their own training, the context, funding policies and technological resources.

Cited by

Article Details

References

Agger, B. (1991). Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism: Their Sociological Relevance. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 105-131. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2083337

Ahmad, S., Wasim, S., Irfan, S., Gogoi, S., Srivastava, A. y Farheen. Z. (2019). Qualitative v/s. Quantitative Research - A Summarized Review. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 6 (43), 2828-2832. https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh%2F2019%2F587

Andersen, E. (2010). Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-epistemology/

Baltes, P. B., Reese, H. W. y Nesselroade, J. R. (1981). Métodos de investigación en psicología evolutiva. Enfoque del ciclo vital. Morata.

Banco Mundial (2021). Gasto en investigación y desarrollo (% del PIB). https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS

Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Research, 31(8), 18-20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031008018

Cajide, J. (1992a). La investigación cualitativa, tradiciones y perspectivas contemporáneas.Bordón, 44 (4) 357-373.

Cajide, J. (1992b). Potencia de las pruebas estadísticas y conceptos relacionados: un análisis mediante el SPSS. Bordón, 44 (2), 223-232.

Cajide, J. (1993). Proyecto Docente e Investigador de Pedagogía Experimental. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

Cajide, J. (2000). La investigación en el aula: el profesor investigador. En D. González., E. Hidalgo, y J. Gutiérrez (Coords.), Innovación en la escuela y mejora de la calidad educativa (pp. 123-138). Grupo Editorial Universitario.

Cajide, J. (2011) (Coord.).Innovación y transferencia: reflexiones desde la universidad y la empresa. Servicio de Publicaciones e Intercambio Científico de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.

Cajide, J. y Rubal, X. (1985). Aplicación del Meta-Análisis al estudio de algunos factores del rendimiento escolar: una investigación en Galicia. Revista Investigación Educativa, 3 (6), 371-375.

Cajide, J., Porto A. Mª. y Martínez, E. (2004). Metodología en investigación educativa actual. En D. González y L. Buendía (Coords.), Temas fundamentales en la investigación educativa (pp.109-1040). La Muralla.

Carr, W. y Kemmis, K. S. (1988). Teoría crítica de la enseñanza. La investigación en la formación del profesorado. Martínez Roca.

Clark J. y Perrault, R. (2023) (Co-Directors). Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2023. Computers and Society. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.03715

Denzin, N. K. (1970). The Research Act in Sociology: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. The Butther Worth Group.

Eisenhart, M. (2001). Educational ethnography past, present, and future: ideas to think with. Educational Researcher, 30 (8), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030008016

Erickson, F. y Gutierrez, K. (2002). Culture, Rigor, and Science in Educational Research. Educational Research, 31(8), 21-24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3594390

European Commission. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. (2021). Towards a reform of the research assessment system: Scoping report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/707440

Fusch, P., Fusch, G.N. y Ness, R. (2018). Denzin's Paradigm Shift: Revisiting Triangulation in Qualitative Research. Journal of Social Change, 10(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.5590/JOSC.2018.10.1.02

Glass, G. V., McGaw, B. y Lee, M. (1981). Meta-Analysis in Social Research. SAGE Publications.

Guba, E. y Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. En N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks.

Guba, E. G. y Lincoln, Y. S. (1997). Naturalistic and Rationalistic Enquiry. En J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational Research, Methodology, and Measurement: An international handbook (pp. 86-90). Pergamon.

Husén, T. (1997). Research Paradigms in Education. En J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook (pp. 16-22). Pergamon

Iglesias da Cunha, L. (Coord.) (2023). Metodologías de investigación cualitativa en pedagogía social y educación ambiental. Informes, casos, y problemas de investigación educativa. Octaedro.

Jato, E., Cajide, J., Muñoz, M.ª A., y García, B. (2016). La formación del profesorado universitario en competencias lifelong learning a partir de las demandas de empleadores y egresados, Revista de Investigación Educativa, 34(1) 69-85. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.34.1.215341

Kaplan, A. (1997). Scientific Methods in Educational Research. En J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook (pp. 112-119). Pergamon.

Lather, P. (2001). Validity as an incitement to discourse: Qualitative researcher and the crisis of legitimation. En W. Richardson (4th Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp.141-250). American Educational Research Association.

Lin, N. (1976). Foundations of Social Research. McGraw Hill.

Lockwood, C., Munn, Z. y Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000062

Mason, J. (2006). Six strategies for mixing methods and linking data in social science research. Real Life Methods Working Papers. University of Manchester. https://www.brown.uk.com/teaching/HEST5001/strategiesformixingmethods.pdf

National Research Council (2002). Scientific Research in Education. National Academic Press.

O'Brien, B. C., Harris I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A. y Cook D.A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89 (9), 1245-1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000388

Perrault, R. y Clark, J. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024. Computers and Society. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.19522

Pierre, E. A. (2002). “Science” rejects Postmodernism. American Educational Research Association, 31(8), 25-27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3594391

Pilcher, N. y Cortazzi, M. (2023). 'Qualitative' and 'quantitative' methods and approaches across subject fields: implications for research values, assumptions, and practices. Quality & Quantity, 58 (3), 2357–2387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01734-4

Porto, A. M.ª y Mosteiro, Mª. J. (2016). Investigación e innovación en la educación actual. Revista Boletín Redipe, 5(7), 17-33. https://revista.redipe.org/index.php/1/article/view/24

Sawatsky, A.P., Ratelle, J. T. y Beckman, T. J. (2019). Quantitative Research Methods in Medical Education. Anesthesiology, 131 (1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000002727

Smith, H. W. (1975). Strategies of Social Research: The Methodological Imagination. Prentice Hall.

Stivens, J. (1990). Intermediate Statistics: A Modern Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Taherdoost, H. (2022). What Are Different Research Approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Research, Their Applications, Types, and Limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5 (1), 53-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538

Webster´s New World Dictionary of the American Language (1970). Warner Books.

Weitzman, E.A. y Miles, M.B. (1995). Programas informáticos para el análisis de datos cualitativos: un libro de consulta sobre software. Sage Publications.

Wilkinson, L. y Task Force on Statistical Inference, American Psychological Association, Science Directorate (1999). Statistical methods in Psychology Journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54 (8), 594-604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594