Contenido principal del artículo

Ángel Luis Jiménez Fernández
Universidad de Sevilla
España
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3882-0883
Vol. 48 (2021), Artículos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/verba.48.6943
Recibido: 17-06-2020 Aceptado: 28-09-2020 Publicado: 29-10-2021
Derechos de autoría Cómo citar

Resumen

En este trabajo analizo el impacto de los denominados Fenómenos de Oración Matriz, es decir, operaciones de índole discursiva que se dan exclusivamente en oraciones principales, como la Anteposición Negativa (ANeg), en oraciones relativas especificativas y explicativas, estableciendo un contraste entre el inglés y el español desde una perspectiva minimista (p. ej. This car, which only rarely did I drive, is in excellent condition). A tal efecto, he realizado un experimento con nativos de ambas lenguas, donde la tarea era juzgar la aceptabilidad de los tipos de relativas que incluían ANeg. El resultado más intrigante consiste en que en español no hay distinción entre los tipos de relativas que aceptan la ANeg, mientras que en inglés solo la permiten las relativas explicativas. La variación detectada en este trabajo experimental se explica mediante un análisis formal basado en el mecanismo de herencia de rasgos discursivos y la diferencia entre aserción y presuposición, que se refleja en la derivación sintáctica mediante la inclusión de un operador factivo (no-asertivo) que bloqueará o no la ANeg, dependiendo de si esta tiene que cruzar el operador no-asertivo en su movimiento a la periferia izquierda de la oración en una lengua determinada.

Citado por

Detalles del artículo

Referencias

ALBOIU, G.; HILL, V. (2019): “Narrative infinitives, narrative gerunds, and the features of the C-T system”, Journal of Historical Syntax 3, pp. 1-36.

ANTOMO, M. (2012): “Interpreting embedded verb second: Causal modifiers in German”, Proceedings of ConSOLE 17, pp. 27-51.

BATLLORI, M; HERNANZ, M. L. (2014): “Weak focus and polarity: Asymmetries between Spanish and Catalan”, en T. Biberauer y G. Walkden (eds.): Syntax over Time: Lexical, Morphological and Information-Structural Interactions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 280-298. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687923.003.0017

BENINCÀ, P. (2012): “Determiners and relative clauses”, Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 4(1), pp. 92-109.

BENINCÀ, P.; CINQUE, G. (2014): “Kind-defining relative clauses in the diachrony of Italian”, en P. Benincà, A. Ledgeway y N. Vincent (eds.): Diachrony and Dialects. Oxford: OUP, pp. 257-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701781.003.0013

BIANCHI, V.; FRASCARELLI, M. (2010): “Is topic a root phenomenon?”, Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2, pp. 43-88.

BOSQUE, I. (1980): Sobre la Negación. Madrid: Cátedra.

BRUCART, J. M. (1999): “La estructura del Sintagma Nominal: Las oraciones de relativo”, en I. Bosque y V. Demonte (dirs.): Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa, vol. 1, pp. 395-522.

CHOMSKY, N. (2008): “On phases”, en R. Freidin, C. Otero y M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.): Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 133-166.

CULICOVER, P. (1991): “Polarity, inversion, and focus in English”, en Proceedings of the Eighth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Columbus: ESCOL Publications / Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University, pp. 46-68.

DE CAT, C. (2012): “Towards an interface definition of root phenomena” en L. Aelbrecht, L. Haegeman y R. Nye (eds.): Main Clause Phenomena. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 135-158. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.06cat

EMONDS, J. (1969): Root and Structure-Preserving Transformations. Tesis doctoral. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

EMONDS, J. (1976): A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.

EMONDS. J. (2004): “Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions”, en D. Adger, C. De Cat y G. Tsoulas (eds.): Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 75-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-1910-6_4

FRASCARELLI, M.; JIMÉNEZ-FERNÁNDEZ, Á. L. (2017): “Subextraction at the discourse-grammar interface: A featural approach to island effects”, en O. Fernández-Soriano, E. Castroviejo e I. Pérez-Jiménez (eds.): Boundaries, Phases, and Interfaces. Case Studies in Honor of Violeta Demonte. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 224-254. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.239.11fra

FRASCARELLI, M.; JIMÉNEZ-FERNÁNDEZ, Á. L. (2019): “Understanding partiality in pro-drop languages: An information–structure approach”, Syntax 29(2/3), pp. 162-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12184

GALLEGO, Á. (2007): Phase Theory and Parametric Variation. Tesis doctoral. Bellaterra, Barcelona: Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.

GÄRTNER, H.-M. (2002): “On the force of V-2 declaratives”, Theoretical Linguistics 28, pp. 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2002.28.1.33

HAEGEMAN, L. (2012): Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and the Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199858774.001.0001

HAEGEMAN, L.; HILL, V. (2013): “The syntactization of discourse”, en R. Folli, C. Sevdali y R. Truswell (eds.): Syntax and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 370-390. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018

HEYCOCK, C. (2006): “Embedded root phenomena”, en M. Everaert y H. van Riemsdijk (eds.): The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell, vol. 2, pp. 174-209. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch23

HOOPER, J.; THOMPSON, S. (1973): “On the applicability of root transformations”, Linguistic Inquiry 4, pp. 465-97.

HUDDLESTON, R.; PULLUM, G. (2002): The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530

JIMÉNEZ-FERNÁNDEZ, Á. L. (2018): “Negative Preposing. Intervention and parametric variation in complement clauses”, Atlantis 40(1), pp. 11-37. https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2018-40.1.01

JIMÉNEZ-FERNÁNDEZ, Á. L. (2020): Syntax-Information Structure Interactions in the Sentential, Verbal and Nominal Peripheries. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

JIMÉNEZ-FERNÁNDEZ, Á. L.; MIYAGAWA, s. (2014): “A feature-inheritance approach to root phenomena and parametric variation”, Lingua 145, pp. 276-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.008

LASNIK, H. (2003): Minimalist Investigations in Linguistic Theory. London: Routledge.

LEONETTI, M.; ESCANDELL, V. (2009): “Fronting and verum focus in Spanish”, en A. Dufter y D. Jacob (eds.): Focus and Background in Romance Languages. Amsterdam y Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 155-204. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.112.07leo

LEONETTI, M.; ESCANDELL, V. (2017): “El foco es relativo”, en Á. Gallego, Y. Rodríguez y J. Sánchez-Fernández (eds.): Relaciones Sintácticas: Homenaje a José M. Brucart y M. Lluïsa Hernanz. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, pp. 435-446.

LÓPEZ, L. (2009): A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557400.001.0001

MEINUNGER, A. (2004): “Verb position, verbal mood and the anchoring (potential) of sentences”, en H. Lohnstein y S. Trissler (eds.): The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 313-341.

MİYAGAWA, S. (2010): Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying Agreement-Based and Discourse Configurational Languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8116.001.0001

MIYAGAWA, S. (2017): Agreement Beyond Phi. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10958.001.0001

OJEA, A. (2016): “Categorías mixtas truncadas: La nominalización defectiva en las cláusulas relativas existenciales modales”, RLA: Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada 54(1), pp. 129-147. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48832016000100007

OJEA, A. (2017): “Core intentional features in the syntactic computation: Deriving the position of the subject in Spanish”, Lingua 195, pp. 72-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.06.007

OJEA, A. (2019): “EPP satisfaction on discourse grounds: The case of locative inversion”, Syntax 22(2/3), pp. 248-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12181

ORTEGA-SANTOS, I. (2020): “Dialect distance and data assessment in Chilean, Venezuelan and Puerto Rican Spanish”, manuscrito sin publicar, Universidad de Memphis, EE. UU.

POTTS, C. (2007): “Into the conventional-implicature dimension”, Philosophy Compass 2(4), pp. 665-679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00089.x

QUIRK, R. S.; GREENBAUM, S; LEECH, G.; SVARTVIK, J. (1985): A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

RADFORD, A. (2009): Analysing English Sentences: A Minimalist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801617

RADFORD, A. (2019): Relative Clauses: Structure and Variation in Everyday English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108687744

RICHARDS, N. W. (1999): “Cyclicity and the ordering of multiple specifiers”, en S. Epstein y N. Hornstein (eds.): Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 127-158.

RIZZI, L. (1990): Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

RIZZI, L. (1997): “The fine structure of the left periphery”, en L. Haegeman (ed.): Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7

RIZZI, L. (2004): “Locality and left periphery”, en A. Belletti (ed.): Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, vol. 3, pp. 223-251.

RIZZI, L. (2006): “On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects”, en L. Cheng y N. Corver (eds.): Wh-Movement: Moving on. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 97-134.

SPEAS, M. (2000). “Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features”, Lingua 14, pp. 255-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00030-5

SPEAS, M.; TENNY, C. (2003): “Configurational properties of point of view roles”, en A. M. Di Sciullo (ed.): Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 315-344. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.57.15spe

SPROUSE, J.; ALMEIDA, D. (2012): “Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger’s Core Syntax”, Journal of Linguistics 48(3), pp. 609-652. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226712000011

SPROUSE, J.; SCHÜTZE, C.; ALMEIDA, D. (2013): “A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001-2010”, Lingua 134, pp. 219-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002

SUÑER, M. (1992): “V-movement and the licensing of argumental wh-phrases in Spanish”, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12, pp. 335-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993148

VILLA-GARCÍA, J. (2015): The Syntax of Multiple-Que Sentences in Spanish: Along the Left Periphery. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.2

VILLATA, S.; RIZZI, L.; FRANCK, J. (2016): “Intervention effects and Relativized Minimality: New experimental evidence from graded judgments”, Lingua 179, pp. 76-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.004

ZUBIZARRETA, M. L. (1998): Word Order, Prosody and Focus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.