Judicial argumentation: Control and Responsibility of Judicial Organs.
Article Sidebar
Published:
17-05-2013
Main Article Content
Vol 18 No 1-2 (2011): International Tribute to Esperanza Guisán (Volume II), Sección Monográfica: Homenaje a Esperanza Guisán 2010-2012 (Parte 2), pages 197-229
Submitted: 26-11-2012
Accepted: 18-05-2013
Published: 17-05-2013
Abstract
This paper takes as starting point the relative indeterminateness of current legal systems. This circumstance determines from the point of view of judicial activity a substantial freedom for judges, which translates into the existence of different interpretive possibilities. For this reason the role of argumentationin judicial activity has been reinforced, but at the same time the question arises of how to control the judges and what kind of responsibility they have in exercising their functions.
Keywords:
justification, judicial responresponsibilitysibility, interpretive freedom
Article Details
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Esperanza Guisán, Nicolás María López Calera, Carmen Verde Diego, Manuel Segura Ortega, Joaquín Rodríguez Toubes-Muñiz, Recensiones. , Télos: Vol 1 No 3 (1992): 500 Quinto Centenario del Descubrimiento de América
- Manuel Segura Ortega, Problemas interpretativos e indeterminación del Derecho , Dereito: revista xurídica da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela: Vol 22 No Ext (2013)