Contenido principal del artículo

José Montoya Sáenz
Universidad de Valencia
España
Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (1996): La polémica entre John Harsanyi y Amartya Sen., Artículos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/t.5.1.644
Recibido: 15-12-2012 Aceptado: 15-12-2012 Publicado: 01-01-2002
Derechos de autoría Cómo citar

Resumen

Bentham's critical statements on the Declaration of Human Rights of the French revolutionaries are supposed to be merely of historical value, as directed against a dated formulation. Against this, it is argued that the essential point of Bentham's argument is valid against any intuitivist interpretation of human rights (that is, against interpretations that take human rights as ultimate, absolute data) but are agreeable with an interpretation that takes Human Rights to be preferred lines of action that are normally conducive to the greatest general hapiness.

Citado por

Detalles del artículo

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a(s)