Contido principal do artigo

María Ángeles López Cabarcos
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela – Facultade de Administración e Dirección de Empresas de Lugo
Espanha
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9844-8767
Noelia Romero Castro
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela – Facultade de Administración e Dirección de Empresas de Lugo
Espanha
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8956-0367
Vanessa Miramontes Viña
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela – Facultade de Administración e Dirección de Empresas de Lugo
Espanha
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1197-9635
v. 29 n. 2 (2020): Special Issue. Socio-economic challenges of demographic change, Articles, páginas 1-25
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/rge.29.2.6914
Recibido: 31-05-2020 Aceito: 01-10-2020 Publicado: 16-10-2020
Direitos de Autor Como Citar

Resumo

Las comunidades energéticas renovables (CER) se han postulado en la literatura académica como una potencial fuente de oportunidades para el desarrollo rural sostenible. Las nuevas líneas estratégicas del Gobierno de la nación apuntan a que podrían empezar a incentivarse de un modo más contundente, haciendo necesario el análisis de los condicionantes de la predisposición a participar y/o invertir en este tipo de iniciativas. Con base en la información recogida a través de una encuesta en un pequeño pueblo de Galicia, analizamos mediante técnicas cuantitativas (análisis de componentes principales y de regresión múltiple) las características sociodemográficas y sociopsicológicas que determinan la predisposición a participar y/o invertir en una CER rural. Los resultados revelan que el género, el nivel de renta y un factor de capital social relacionado con la confianza y la cooperación resultan significativos. Estos resultados nos permiten formular conclusiones y recomendaciones para investigadores, promotores y legisladores.

plugins.generic.citations.citedby

Detalles do artigo

Referências

Aldás, J., e Uriel, E. (2017). Análisis multivariante aplicado con R. 2ª ed. Madrid: Paraninfo.

Bauwens, T. (2016). Explaining the diversity of motivations behind community renewable energy. Energy Policy, 93, 278-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.017

Bauwens, T., e Devine-Wright, P. (2018). Positive energies? An empirical study of community energy participation and attitudes to renewable energy. Energy Policy, 118, 612-625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.062

Becker, S., Kunze, C., e Vancea, M. (2017). Community energy and social entrepreneurship: Addressing purpose, organisation and embeddedness of renewable energy projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 25-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.048

Bergek, A., Mignon, I., e Sundberg, G. (2013). Who invests in renewable electricity production? Empirical evidence and suggestions for further research. Energy Policy, 56, 568-581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.038

Berka, A. L., e Creamer, E. (2018). Taking stock of the local impacts of community owned renewable energy: A review and research agenda. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 3400-3419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.050

Boon, F. P., e Dieperink, C. (2014). Local civil society based renewable energy organisations in the Netherlands: Exploring the factors that stimulate their emergence and development. Energy Policy, 69, 297-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.046

Braito, M., Flint, C., Muhar, A., Penker, M., e Vogel, S. (2017). Individual and collective socio-psychological patterns of photovoltaic investment under diverging policy regimes of Austria and Italy. Energy Policy, 109, 141-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.063

Broughel, A. E., e Hampl, N. (2018). Community financing of renewable energy projects in Austria and Switzerland: Profiles of potential investors. Energy Policy, 123, 722-736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.054

Campos, I., et al. (2020). Regulatory challenges and opportunities for collective renewable energy prosumers in the EU. Energy Policy, 138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111212

Capellán-Pérez, I., Campos-Celador, A., e Terés-Zubiaga, J. (2018). Renewable energy cooperatives as an instrument towards the energy transition in Spain. Energy Policy, 123, 215-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.064

Cato, M. S., Arthur, L., Keenoy, T., e Smith, R. (2008). Entrepreneurial energy: Associative entrepreneurship in the renewable energy sector in Wales. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 14(5), 313-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550810897678

Cayuela, L. (2009). Modelos lineales en R: regresión, ANOVA y ANCOVA. Recuperado de: https://portal.uah.es/portal/page/portal/epd2_asignaturas/asig202218/informacion_academica/2Modelos%20lineales.pdf

Christmann, G. B. (2014). Social entrepreneurs on the periphery: Uncovering emerging pioneers of regional development. DisP-The Planning Review, 50(1), 43-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2014.926725

Clausen, L. T., e Rudolph, D. (2020). Renewable energy for sustainable rural development: Synergies and mismatches. Energy Policy, 138, 111289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111289

Cohen, J., e Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Copena Rodríguez, D., e Simón Fernández, X. (2018a). Enerxía eólica e desenvolvemento local en galicia: os parques eólicos singulares municipais. Revista Galega de Economía, 27(1), 31-48. Recuperado de: https://revistas.usc.gal/index.php/rge/article/view/5223

Copena Rodríguez, D., e Simón Fernández, X. (2018b). Wind farms and payments to landowners: Opportunities for rural development for the case of Galicia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 95, 38-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.043

D’Souza, C., e Yiridoe, E. K. (2014). Social acceptance of wind energy development and planning in rural communities of Australia: A consumer analysis. Energy Policy, 74, 262-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.035

Dammers, E., e Keiner, M. (2006). Rural development in Europe. DisP-The Planning Review, 42(166), 5-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2006.10556958

Dobigny, L. (2019). Sociotechnical morphologies of rural energy autonomy in Germany, Austria and France. En F. López, M. Pellegrino e O. Coutard (Eds.), Local energy autonomy: Spaces, scales, politics (pp. 185-211). London, UK: ISTE/Wiley.

Dóci, G., e Gotchev, B. (2016). When energy policy meets community: Rethinking risk perceptions of renewable energy in Germany and the Netherlands. Energy Research and Social Science, 22, 26-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.019

Dóci, G., e Vasileiadou, E. (2015). “Let’s do it ourselves” individual motivations for investing in renewables at community level. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, 41-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.051

Dütschke, E., e Wesche, J. P. (2018). The energy transformation as a disruptive development at community level. Energy Research and Social Science, 37, 251-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.030

Engelken, M., Römer, B., Drescher, M., Welpe, I. M., e Picot, A. (2016). Comparing drivers, barriers, and opportunities of business models for renewable energies: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 795-809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.163

European Court of Auditors. (2018). Renewable energy for sustainable rural development: significant potential synergies, but mostly unrealized. Special Report No. 05. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: ECA. Recuperado de: https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/SR18_05/SR_Renewable_Energy_EN.pdf

Fergen, J., e Jacquet, J. B. (2016). Beauty in motion: Expectations, attitudes, and values of wind energy development in the rural U. S. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 133-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.09.003

Fleiß, E., Hatzl, S., Seebauer, S., e Posch, A. (2017). Money, not morale: The impact of desires and beliefs on private investment in photovoltaic citizen participation initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 920-927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.123

Franklin, J. B., Sathish, T., Vinithkumar, N. V., e Kirubagaran, R. (2020). A novel approach to predict chlorophyll-a in coastal-marine ecosystems using multiple linear regression and principal component scores. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 152, 110902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.110902

Fraune, C. (2015). Gender matters: Women, renewable energy, and citizen participation in Germany. Energy Research and Social Science, 7, 55-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.02.005

Groth, T. M., e Vogt, C. A. (2014). Rural wind farm development: Social, environmental and economic features important to local residents. Renewable Energy, 63, 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.08.035

Haggett, C., e Aitken, M. (2015). Grassroots energy innovations: The role of community ownership and investment. Current Sustainable Renewable Energy Reports, 2, 98-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-015-0035-8

Hai, M. A. (2019). Rethinking the social acceptance of solar energy: Exploring “states of willingness” in Finland. Energy Research and Social Science, 51, 96-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.013

Heaslip, E., Costello, G. J., e Lohan, J. (2016). Assessing good-practice frameworks for the development of sustainable energy communities in Europe: Lessons from Denmark and Ireland. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 4(3), 307-319. DOI: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.2016.04.0024

Herbes, C., Brummer, V., Rognli, J., Blazejewski, S., e Gericke, N. (2017). Responding to policy change: New business models for renewable energy cooperatives – Barriers perceived by cooperatives’ members. Energy Policy, 109, 82-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.051

Hewitt, R. J., et al. (2019). Social innovation in community energy in Europe: A review of the evidence. Frontiers in Energy Research, 7, 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00031

Hicks, J., e Ison, N. (2011). Community-owned renewable energy (CRE): Opportunities for rural Australia. Rural Society, 20(3), 244-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/rsj.20.3.244

Hicks, J., e Ison, N. (2018). An exploration of the boundaries of ‘community’ in community renewable energy projects: Navigating between motivations and context. Energy Policy, 113, 523-534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.031

Igliński, B., Buczkowski, R., e Cichosz, M. (2015). Biogas production in Poland - Current state, potential and perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 686-695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.013

Información Xeográfica de Galicia. (2019). GIS: Cartografía de Galicia en formato vectorial SHP para Sistemas de Información Geográfica. Santiago de Compostela: Xunta de Galicia. Recuperado de: http://mapas.xunta.gal

Instituto Galego de Estatística. (2020). Baltar. Santiago de Compostela: IGE. Recuperado de: https://www.ige.eu/igebdt/esq.jsp?paxina=002003001&c=1&ruta=fichas%2Fbdmunicipal_tablas.jsp%3FESP%3D32005

Instituto para la Diversificación y Ahorro de la Energía. (2019). Mapas de potenciales de biomasa. Madrid: IDAE.

Janhunen, S., Hujala, M., e Pätäri, S. (2014). Owners of second homes, locals and their attitudes towards future rural wind farm. Energy Policy, 73, 450-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.050

Kalkbrenner, B. J., e Roosen, J. (2016). Citizens’ willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects: The role of community and trust in Germany. Energy Research and Social Science, 13, 60-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.006

Klein, S. J. W., e Coffey, S. (2016). Building a sustainable energy future, one community at a time. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 867-880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.129

Koirala, B. P., et al. (2018). Trust, awareness, and independence: Insights from a socio-psychological factor analysis of citizen knowledge and participation in community energy systems. Energy Research and Social Science, 38, 33-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.009

Koirala, B. P., Koliou, E., Friege, J., Hakvoort, R. A., e Herder, P. M. (2016). Energetic communities for community energy: A review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 722-744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.080

Laboratorio de Cartografía y Sistema de Información Geográfica. (2019). Mapa del potencial geotérmico de Galicia. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid, Laboratorio de Cartografía y Sistema de Información Geográfica.

Li, L. W., Birmele, J., Schaich, H., e Konold, W. (2013). Transitioning to Community-owned Renewable Energy: Lessons from Germany. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 719-728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.089

Li, L. W., e Yu, Y. H. (2016). Planning low carbon communities: Why is a self-sustaining energy management system indispensable? Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy, 11(4), 371-376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2011.647243

López-Iglesias, E., Peón, D., e Rodríguez-Álvarez, J. (2018). Mobility innovations for sustainability and cohesion of rural areas: A transport model and public investment analysis for Valdeorras (Galicia, Spain). Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3520-3534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.149

López-Roldán, P., e Fachelli, S. (2016). Metodología de la investigación social cuantitativa (parte III, cap. III). Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. DOI: http://ddd.uab.cat/record/142928

Lowitzsch, J., e Hanke, F. (2019). Renewable energy cooperatives. En J. Lowitzsch (Ed.), Energy transition: Financing consumer co-ownership in renewables (pp. 139-162). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93518-8

Mahzouni, A. (2019). The role of institutional entrepreneurship in emerging energy communities: The town of St. Peter in Germany. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 107, 297-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.011

Markantoni, M., e Woolvin, M. (2013). The role of rural communities in the transition to a low-carbon Scotland: A review. Local Environment, 20(2), 202-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.834880

Martínez-Filgueira, X., Peón, D., e López-Iglesias, E. (2017). Intra-rural divides and regional planning: an analysis of a traditional emigration region (Galicia, Spain). European Planning Studies, 25(7), 1237-1255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1319465

Meijer, M. (2018). Community-led Government-fed and informal. Exploring planning from below in depopulating regions across Europe. Vianen, Netherlands: Proefschriftmaken.nl. Recuperado de: https://repository.ubn.ru.nl//bitstream/handle/2066/183214/183214.pdf?sequence=1

Mey, F., e Diesendorf, M. (2018). Who owns an energy transition? Strategic action fields and community wind energy in Denmark. Energy Research and Social Science, 35, 108-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.044

Mignon, I., e Rüdinger, A. (2016). The impact of systemic factors on the deployment of cooperative projects within renewable electricity production – An international comparison. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 478-488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.026

Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, y Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico. (2019). Masas de agua superficial (polígonos) PHC 2015-2021. Madrid: Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación/Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico. Recuperado de: https://www.mapama.gob.es/ide/metadatos/srv/spa/metadata.show?uuid=bb612c552729-4f31-bf4f-b5e190d74b46

Mitchell, R. C., e Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Resources for the future. Toronto, Canada: RTF Press.

Moroni, S., Alberti, V., Antoniucci, V., e Bisello, A. (2019). Energy communities in the transition to a low-carbon future: A taxonomical approach and some policy dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Management, 236, 45-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.095

Moula, M. M. E., et al. (2013). Researching social acceptability of renewable energy technologies in Finland. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 2(1), 89-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2013.10.001

Nadaï, A., et al. (2015). French policy localism: Surfing on ‘Positive Energie Territories’ (Tepos). Energy Policy, 78, 281-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.005

Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Tarantola, A., e Stefano, S. (2005). Tools for composite indicators building. Report number: JRC31473. Sevilla: European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC). Recuperado de: http://collection.europarchive.org/dnb/20070702132253/http://farmweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ci/Document/E UR 21682 EN.pdf

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Linking renewable energy to rural development executive summary. Paris, France: OECD. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264180444-en

Paredes-Sánchez, J. P., López-Ochoa, L. M., López-González, L. M., Las-Heras-Casas, J., y Xiberta-Bernat, J. (2018). Energy utilization for distributed thermal production in rural areas: A case study of a self-sustaining system in Spain. Energy Conversion and Management, 174, 1014-1023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.080

Pazo, A. J., e Moragón, M. P. (2018). El despoblamiento en Galicia. la visualización de la “catástrofe”. Ager. Revista de Estudios sobre Despoblación y Desarrollo Rural, 24, 123-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4422/ager.2018.02

Perlaviciute, G., e Steg, L. (2014). Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 35, 361-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.003

Pettazzi, A., e Salsón, S. (2011). Atlas de radiación solar de Galicia. Santiago de Compostela: Xunta de Galicia, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Infraestrutura (MeteoGalicia, Área de Observación e Climatoloxía). Recuperado de: https://www.meteogalicia.gal/datosred/infoweb/meteo/docs/novas/Atlas_Radiacion_Solar_Galicia_gl.pdf

Regueiro Ferreira, R. M. (2019). Capital social y derechos de propiedad : del valor al precio de los solares “eólicos” en Galicia, 1995-2008. Revista Galega de Economía, 28(1), 31-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/rge.28.1.6161

Rogers, J. C., Simmons, E. A., Convery, I., e Weatherall, A. (2008). Public perceptions of opportunities for community-based renewable energy projects. Energy Policy, 36(11), 4217-4226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.028

Romero-Rubio, C., e de Andrés Díaz, J. R. (2015). Sustainable energy communities: A study contrasting Spain and Germany. Energy Policy, 85, 397-409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.012

Rommel, J., Radtke, J., von Jorck, G., Mey, F., e Yildiz, Ö. (2018). Community renewable energy at a crossroads: A think piece on degrowth, technology, and the democratization of the German energy system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1746-1753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.114

Ruiz-Fuensanta, M. J., Gutiérrez-Pedrero, M. J., e Tarancón, M. A. (2019). The role of regional determinants in the deployment of renewable energy in farms. The case of Spain. Sustainability, 11(21), 5937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215937

Salm, S. (2018). The investor-specific price of renewable energy project risk – A choice experiment with incumbent utilities and institutional investors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 1364-1375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.009

Salm, S., Hille, S. L., y Wüstenhagen, R. (2016). What are retail investors’ risk-return preferences towards renewable energy projects? A choice experiment in Germany. Energy Policy, 97, 310-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.042

Seyfang, G., Park, J. J., e Smith, A. (2013). A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK. Energy Policy, 61, 977-989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.030

Simón, X., Copena, D., e Montero, M. (2019). Strong wind development with no community participation. The case of Galicia (1995-2009). Energy Policy, 133, 110930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110930

Slee, B. (2015). Is there a case for community-based equity participation in Scottish on-shore wind energy production? Gaps in evidence and research needs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 540-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.064

Sovacool, B. K. (2014). What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research and Social Science, 1, 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003

Strachan, P. A., Cowell, R., Ellis, G., Sherry-Brennan, F., e Toke, D. (2015). Promoting Community Renewable Energy in a Corporate Energy World. Sustainable Development, 23(2), 96-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1576

Süsser, D., Döring, M., e Ratter, B. M. W. (2017). Harvesting energy: Place and local entrepreneurship in community-based renewable energy transition. Energy Policy, 101, 332-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.018

Süsser, D., e Kannen, A. (2017). Renewables? Yes, please!’: perceptions and assessment of community transition induced by renewable-energy projects in North Frisia. Sustainability Science, 12(4), 563-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0433-5

Tapia, C., et al. (2017). Profiling urban vulnerabilities to climate change: An indicator-based vulnerability assessment for European cities. Ecological Indicators, 78, 142-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.040

Urban, B., e George, J. (2018). An empirical study on measures relating to impact investing in South Africa. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 10(1), 61-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2018.088622

van Veelen, B., e Haggett, C. (2017). Uncommon Ground: The Role of Different Place Attachments in Explaining Community Renewable Energy Projects. Sociologia Ruralis, 57(S1), 533-554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12128

Varela-Vázquez, P., e Sánchez-Carreira, M. D. C. (2015). Socioeconomic impact of wind energy on peripheral regions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 982-990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.045

Viardot, E. (2013). The role of cooperatives in overcoming the barriers to adoption of renewable energy. Energy Policy, 63, 756-764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.034

Von Bock Und Polach, C., Kunze, C., Maaß, O., e Grundmann, P. (2015). Bioenergy as a socio-technical system: The nexus of rules, social capital and cooperation in the development of bioenergy villages in Germany. Energy Research and Social Science, 6, 128-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.02.003

Walker, G., y Devine-Wright, P. (2008). Community renewable energy: What should it mean? Energy Policy, 36(2), 497-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019

Warren, C. R., e McFadyen, M. (2010). Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 204-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.010

World Bank, e Technical University of Denmark. (2019). Global wind atlas. Washington DC, WA: World Bank / Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.

Wüstenhagen, R., e Menichetti, E. (2012). Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research. Energy Policy, 40(1), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.050

Yildiz, Ö. (2014). Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation – The case of Germany. Renewable Energy, 68(2014), 677-685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.038