Main Article Content

María Ángeles López Cabarcos
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela – Facultade de Administración e Dirección de Empresas de Lugo
Noelia Romero Castro
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela – Facultade de Administración e Dirección de Empresas de Lugo
Vanessa Miramontes Viña
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela – Facultade de Administración e Dirección de Empresas de Lugo
Vol 29 No 2 (2020): Special Issue: Socio-economic challenges of demographic change, Articles, pages 1-25
Submitted: 31-05-2020 Accepted: 01-10-2020 Published: 16-10-2020
Copyright How to Cite


Renewable Energy Communities (CER) has been postulated in academic literature as a potential source of opportunities for sustainable rural development. The new strategic lines of the Spanish government suggest that they could begin to be encouraged in a more forceful way, making it necessary to analyze the conditions of the predisposition to participate/invest in this type of initiative. Based on the information collected through a survey in a small town in Galicia, we analyzed, using quantitative techniques (principal component analysis and multiple regression analysis), the sociodemographic and sociopsychological characteristics that determine the willingness to participate/invest in a rural CER project. The results reveal that gender, income level and a social capital factor related to trust and cooperation are significant. These results allow us to
formulate conclusions and recommendations for researchers, promoters and legislators.

Cited by

Article Details


Aldás, J., e Uriel, E. (2017). Análisis multivariante aplicado con R. 2ª ed. Madrid: Paraninfo.

Bauwens, T. (2016). Explaining the diversity of motivations behind community renewable energy. Energy Policy, 93, 278-290. DOI:

Bauwens, T., e Devine-Wright, P. (2018). Positive energies? An empirical study of community energy participation and attitudes to renewable energy. Energy Policy, 118, 612-625. DOI:

Becker, S., Kunze, C., e Vancea, M. (2017). Community energy and social entrepreneurship: Addressing purpose, organisation and embeddedness of renewable energy projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 25-36. DOI:

Bergek, A., Mignon, I., e Sundberg, G. (2013). Who invests in renewable electricity production? Empirical evidence and suggestions for further research. Energy Policy, 56, 568-581. DOI:

Berka, A. L., e Creamer, E. (2018). Taking stock of the local impacts of community owned renewable energy: A review and research agenda. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 3400-3419. DOI:

Boon, F. P., e Dieperink, C. (2014). Local civil society based renewable energy organisations in the Netherlands: Exploring the factors that stimulate their emergence and development. Energy Policy, 69, 297-307. DOI:

Braito, M., Flint, C., Muhar, A., Penker, M., e Vogel, S. (2017). Individual and collective socio-psychological patterns of photovoltaic investment under diverging policy regimes of Austria and Italy. Energy Policy, 109, 141-153. DOI:

Broughel, A. E., e Hampl, N. (2018). Community financing of renewable energy projects in Austria and Switzerland: Profiles of potential investors. Energy Policy, 123, 722-736. DOI:

Campos, I., et al. (2020). Regulatory challenges and opportunities for collective renewable energy prosumers in the EU. Energy Policy, 138. DOI:

Capellán-Pérez, I., Campos-Celador, A., e Terés-Zubiaga, J. (2018). Renewable energy cooperatives as an instrument towards the energy transition in Spain. Energy Policy, 123, 215-229. DOI:

Cato, M. S., Arthur, L., Keenoy, T., e Smith, R. (2008). Entrepreneurial energy: Associative entrepreneurship in the renewable energy sector in Wales. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 14(5), 313-329. DOI:

Cayuela, L. (2009). Modelos lineales en R: regresión, ANOVA y ANCOVA. Recuperado de:

Christmann, G. B. (2014). Social entrepreneurs on the periphery: Uncovering emerging pioneers of regional development. DisP-The Planning Review, 50(1), 43-55. DOI:

Clausen, L. T., e Rudolph, D. (2020). Renewable energy for sustainable rural development: Synergies and mismatches. Energy Policy, 138, 111289. DOI:

Cohen, J., e Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Copena Rodríguez, D., e Simón Fernández, X. (2018a). Enerxía eólica e desenvolvemento local en galicia: os parques eólicos singulares municipais. Revista Galega de Economía, 27(1), 31-48. Recuperado de:

Copena Rodríguez, D., e Simón Fernández, X. (2018b). Wind farms and payments to landowners: Opportunities for rural development for the case of Galicia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 95, 38-47. DOI:

D’Souza, C., e Yiridoe, E. K. (2014). Social acceptance of wind energy development and planning in rural communities of Australia: A consumer analysis. Energy Policy, 74, 262-270. DOI:

Dammers, E., e Keiner, M. (2006). Rural development in Europe. DisP-The Planning Review, 42(166), 5-15. DOI:

Dobigny, L. (2019). Sociotechnical morphologies of rural energy autonomy in Germany, Austria and France. En F. López, M. Pellegrino e O. Coutard (Eds.), Local energy autonomy: Spaces, scales, politics (pp. 185-211). London, UK: ISTE/Wiley.

Dóci, G., e Gotchev, B. (2016). When energy policy meets community: Rethinking risk perceptions of renewable energy in Germany and the Netherlands. Energy Research and Social Science, 22, 26-35. DOI:

Dóci, G., e Vasileiadou, E. (2015). “Let’s do it ourselves” individual motivations for investing in renewables at community level. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, 41-50. DOI:

Dütschke, E., e Wesche, J. P. (2018). The energy transformation as a disruptive development at community level. Energy Research and Social Science, 37, 251-254. DOI:

Engelken, M., Römer, B., Drescher, M., Welpe, I. M., e Picot, A. (2016). Comparing drivers, barriers, and opportunities of business models for renewable energies: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 795-809. DOI:

European Court of Auditors. (2018). Renewable energy for sustainable rural development: significant potential synergies, but mostly unrealized. Special Report No. 05. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: ECA. Recuperado de:

Fergen, J., e Jacquet, J. B. (2016). Beauty in motion: Expectations, attitudes, and values of wind energy development in the rural U. S. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 133-141. DOI:

Fleiß, E., Hatzl, S., Seebauer, S., e Posch, A. (2017). Money, not morale: The impact of desires and beliefs on private investment in photovoltaic citizen participation initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 920-927. DOI:

Franklin, J. B., Sathish, T., Vinithkumar, N. V., e Kirubagaran, R. (2020). A novel approach to predict chlorophyll-a in coastal-marine ecosystems using multiple linear regression and principal component scores. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 152, 110902. DOI:

Fraune, C. (2015). Gender matters: Women, renewable energy, and citizen participation in Germany. Energy Research and Social Science, 7, 55-65. DOI:

Groth, T. M., e Vogt, C. A. (2014). Rural wind farm development: Social, environmental and economic features important to local residents. Renewable Energy, 63, 1-8. DOI:

Haggett, C., e Aitken, M. (2015). Grassroots energy innovations: The role of community ownership and investment. Current Sustainable Renewable Energy Reports, 2, 98-104. DOI:

Hai, M. A. (2019). Rethinking the social acceptance of solar energy: Exploring “states of willingness” in Finland. Energy Research and Social Science, 51, 96-106. DOI:

Heaslip, E., Costello, G. J., e Lohan, J. (2016). Assessing good-practice frameworks for the development of sustainable energy communities in Europe: Lessons from Denmark and Ireland. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 4(3), 307-319. DOI:

Herbes, C., Brummer, V., Rognli, J., Blazejewski, S., e Gericke, N. (2017). Responding to policy change: New business models for renewable energy cooperatives – Barriers perceived by cooperatives’ members. Energy Policy, 109, 82-95. DOI:

Hewitt, R. J., et al. (2019). Social innovation in community energy in Europe: A review of the evidence. Frontiers in Energy Research, 7, 1-27. DOI:

Hicks, J., e Ison, N. (2011). Community-owned renewable energy (CRE): Opportunities for rural Australia. Rural Society, 20(3), 244-255. DOI:

Hicks, J., e Ison, N. (2018). An exploration of the boundaries of ‘community’ in community renewable energy projects: Navigating between motivations and context. Energy Policy, 113, 523-534. DOI:

Igliński, B., Buczkowski, R., e Cichosz, M. (2015). Biogas production in Poland - Current state, potential and perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 686-695. DOI:

Información Xeográfica de Galicia. (2019). GIS: Cartografía de Galicia en formato vectorial SHP para Sistemas de Información Geográfica. Santiago de Compostela: Xunta de Galicia. Recuperado de:

Instituto Galego de Estatística. (2020). Baltar. Santiago de Compostela: IGE. Recuperado de:

Instituto para la Diversificación y Ahorro de la Energía. (2019). Mapas de potenciales de biomasa. Madrid: IDAE.

Janhunen, S., Hujala, M., e Pätäri, S. (2014). Owners of second homes, locals and their attitudes towards future rural wind farm. Energy Policy, 73, 450-460. DOI:

Kalkbrenner, B. J., e Roosen, J. (2016). Citizens’ willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects: The role of community and trust in Germany. Energy Research and Social Science, 13, 60-70. DOI:

Klein, S. J. W., e Coffey, S. (2016). Building a sustainable energy future, one community at a time. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 867-880. DOI:

Koirala, B. P., et al. (2018). Trust, awareness, and independence: Insights from a socio-psychological factor analysis of citizen knowledge and participation in community energy systems. Energy Research and Social Science, 38, 33-40. DOI:

Koirala, B. P., Koliou, E., Friege, J., Hakvoort, R. A., e Herder, P. M. (2016). Energetic communities for community energy: A review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 722-744. DOI:

Laboratorio de Cartografía y Sistema de Información Geográfica. (2019). Mapa del potencial geotérmico de Galicia. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid, Laboratorio de Cartografía y Sistema de Información Geográfica.

Li, L. W., Birmele, J., Schaich, H., e Konold, W. (2013). Transitioning to Community-owned Renewable Energy: Lessons from Germany. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 719-728. DOI:

Li, L. W., e Yu, Y. H. (2016). Planning low carbon communities: Why is a self-sustaining energy management system indispensable? Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy, 11(4), 371-376. DOI:

López-Iglesias, E., Peón, D., e Rodríguez-Álvarez, J. (2018). Mobility innovations for sustainability and cohesion of rural areas: A transport model and public investment analysis for Valdeorras (Galicia, Spain). Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3520-3534. DOI:

López-Roldán, P., e Fachelli, S. (2016). Metodología de la investigación social cuantitativa (parte III, cap. III). Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. DOI:

Lowitzsch, J., e Hanke, F. (2019). Renewable energy cooperatives. En J. Lowitzsch (Ed.), Energy transition: Financing consumer co-ownership in renewables (pp. 139-162). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI:

Mahzouni, A. (2019). The role of institutional entrepreneurship in emerging energy communities: The town of St. Peter in Germany. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 107, 297-308. DOI:

Markantoni, M., e Woolvin, M. (2013). The role of rural communities in the transition to a low-carbon Scotland: A review. Local Environment, 20(2), 202-219. DOI:

Martínez-Filgueira, X., Peón, D., e López-Iglesias, E. (2017). Intra-rural divides and regional planning: an analysis of a traditional emigration region (Galicia, Spain). European Planning Studies, 25(7), 1237-1255. DOI:

Meijer, M. (2018). Community-led Government-fed and informal. Exploring planning from below in depopulating regions across Europe. Vianen, Netherlands: Recuperado de:

Mey, F., e Diesendorf, M. (2018). Who owns an energy transition? Strategic action fields and community wind energy in Denmark. Energy Research and Social Science, 35, 108-117. DOI:

Mignon, I., e Rüdinger, A. (2016). The impact of systemic factors on the deployment of cooperative projects within renewable electricity production – An international comparison. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 478-488. DOI:

Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, y Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico. (2019). Masas de agua superficial (polígonos) PHC 2015-2021. Madrid: Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación/Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico. Recuperado de:

Mitchell, R. C., e Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Resources for the future. Toronto, Canada: RTF Press.

Moroni, S., Alberti, V., Antoniucci, V., e Bisello, A. (2019). Energy communities in the transition to a low-carbon future: A taxonomical approach and some policy dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Management, 236, 45-53. DOI:

Moula, M. M. E., et al. (2013). Researching social acceptability of renewable energy technologies in Finland. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 2(1), 89-98. DOI:

Nadaï, A., et al. (2015). French policy localism: Surfing on ‘Positive Energie Territories’ (Tepos). Energy Policy, 78, 281-291. DOI:

Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Tarantola, A., e Stefano, S. (2005). Tools for composite indicators building. Report number: JRC31473. Sevilla: European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC). Recuperado de: UR 21682 EN.pdf

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Linking renewable energy to rural development executive summary. Paris, France: OECD. DOI:

Paredes-Sánchez, J. P., López-Ochoa, L. M., López-González, L. M., Las-Heras-Casas, J., y Xiberta-Bernat, J. (2018). Energy utilization for distributed thermal production in rural areas: A case study of a self-sustaining system in Spain. Energy Conversion and Management, 174, 1014-1023. DOI:

Pazo, A. J., e Moragón, M. P. (2018). El despoblamiento en Galicia. la visualización de la “catástrofe”. Ager. Revista de Estudios sobre Despoblación y Desarrollo Rural, 24, 123-154. DOI:

Perlaviciute, G., e Steg, L. (2014). Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 35, 361-381. DOI:

Pettazzi, A., e Salsón, S. (2011). Atlas de radiación solar de Galicia. Santiago de Compostela: Xunta de Galicia, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Infraestrutura (MeteoGalicia, Área de Observación e Climatoloxía). Recuperado de:

Regueiro Ferreira, R. M. (2019). Capital social y derechos de propiedad : del valor al precio de los solares “eólicos” en Galicia, 1995-2008. Revista Galega de Economía, 28(1), 31-39. DOI:

Rogers, J. C., Simmons, E. A., Convery, I., e Weatherall, A. (2008). Public perceptions of opportunities for community-based renewable energy projects. Energy Policy, 36(11), 4217-4226. DOI:

Romero-Rubio, C., e de Andrés Díaz, J. R. (2015). Sustainable energy communities: A study contrasting Spain and Germany. Energy Policy, 85, 397-409. DOI:

Rommel, J., Radtke, J., von Jorck, G., Mey, F., e Yildiz, Ö. (2018). Community renewable energy at a crossroads: A think piece on degrowth, technology, and the democratization of the German energy system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1746-1753. DOI:

Ruiz-Fuensanta, M. J., Gutiérrez-Pedrero, M. J., e Tarancón, M. A. (2019). The role of regional determinants in the deployment of renewable energy in farms. The case of Spain. Sustainability, 11(21), 5937. DOI:

Salm, S. (2018). The investor-specific price of renewable energy project risk – A choice experiment with incumbent utilities and institutional investors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 1364-1375. DOI:

Salm, S., Hille, S. L., y Wüstenhagen, R. (2016). What are retail investors’ risk-return preferences towards renewable energy projects? A choice experiment in Germany. Energy Policy, 97, 310-320. DOI:

Seyfang, G., Park, J. J., e Smith, A. (2013). A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK. Energy Policy, 61, 977-989. DOI:

Simón, X., Copena, D., e Montero, M. (2019). Strong wind development with no community participation. The case of Galicia (1995-2009). Energy Policy, 133, 110930. DOI:

Slee, B. (2015). Is there a case for community-based equity participation in Scottish on-shore wind energy production? Gaps in evidence and research needs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 540-549. DOI:

Sovacool, B. K. (2014). What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research and Social Science, 1, 1-29. DOI:

Strachan, P. A., Cowell, R., Ellis, G., Sherry-Brennan, F., e Toke, D. (2015). Promoting Community Renewable Energy in a Corporate Energy World. Sustainable Development, 23(2), 96-109. DOI:

Süsser, D., Döring, M., e Ratter, B. M. W. (2017). Harvesting energy: Place and local entrepreneurship in community-based renewable energy transition. Energy Policy, 101, 332-341. DOI:

Süsser, D., e Kannen, A. (2017). Renewables? Yes, please!’: perceptions and assessment of community transition induced by renewable-energy projects in North Frisia. Sustainability Science, 12(4), 563-578. DOI:

Tapia, C., et al. (2017). Profiling urban vulnerabilities to climate change: An indicator-based vulnerability assessment for European cities. Ecological Indicators, 78, 142-155. DOI:

Urban, B., e George, J. (2018). An empirical study on measures relating to impact investing in South Africa. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 10(1), 61-77. DOI:

van Veelen, B., e Haggett, C. (2017). Uncommon Ground: The Role of Different Place Attachments in Explaining Community Renewable Energy Projects. Sociologia Ruralis, 57(S1), 533-554. DOI:

Varela-Vázquez, P., e Sánchez-Carreira, M. D. C. (2015). Socioeconomic impact of wind energy on peripheral regions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 982-990. DOI:

Viardot, E. (2013). The role of cooperatives in overcoming the barriers to adoption of renewable energy. Energy Policy, 63, 756-764. DOI:

Von Bock Und Polach, C., Kunze, C., Maaß, O., e Grundmann, P. (2015). Bioenergy as a socio-technical system: The nexus of rules, social capital and cooperation in the development of bioenergy villages in Germany. Energy Research and Social Science, 6, 128-135. DOI:

Walker, G., y Devine-Wright, P. (2008). Community renewable energy: What should it mean? Energy Policy, 36(2), 497-500. DOI:

Warren, C. R., e McFadyen, M. (2010). Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 204-213. DOI:

World Bank, e Technical University of Denmark. (2019). Global wind atlas. Washington DC, WA: World Bank / Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.

Wüstenhagen, R., e Menichetti, E. (2012). Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research. Energy Policy, 40(1), 1-10. DOI:

Yildiz, Ö. (2014). Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation – The case of Germany. Renewable Energy, 68(2014), 677-685. DOI: