The responsibility to protect and the new wars: a tool against violent non-state actors?
Main Article Content
Abstract
In recent decades, armed non-state actors have become increasingly important for international relations and international security. This is accompanied by a new category of armed conflicts, the new wars, which are characterized by a multitude of state, non-state and hybrid actors, their global character, and a decentralized shadow economy. In these new conflicts, the civilian population has become the primary target of armed violence. This poses major challenges to the international order and international law, as these have been developed primarily regarding states as monopolists on the use of force. The R2P, whose aim is to protect civilians from systematic and grave human rights violations, can be a helpful tool for the sustainable solution of these conflicts. However, for this to be possible, the application of the principle must be fundamentally redesigned. Instead of bombing campaigns from the air, an integral approach combining military and civilian capacities is needed. Interventions must be more of a policing nature and support local actors to enable sustainable reform of the affected states. The focus must be on (re-)establishing the rule of law and creating a legitimate and social economy. Such an approach, which puts human security at the center and combines bottom-up elements with international support, could also contribute to a long-term solution of the current armed conflict in Yemen, which currently represents one of the biggest humanitarian crises worldwide. However, this requires reconsiderations by the international actors involved in the conflict and a more proactive approach by the UN Security Council.
Keywords:
Article Details
References
Alasrar, F. A. (2018, abril 02). Yemen’s destructive identity crisis. Arab News. Recuperado de: https://www.arabnews.com/node/1277836
Ardemagni, E. (2020). Beyond Yemen’s Militiadoms: Restarting from local agency. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.
Bellamy, A. J. y Luck, E. C. (2018). The Responsibility to Protect: From Promise to Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Chinkin, C. y Kaldor, M. (2017). International Law and New Wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clausen, M.-L. (2019). Achieving a Sustainable Peace in Yemen Lies with Locally Driven Initiatives. Copenhague: Danish Institute for International Studies. Recuperado de: https://www.diis.dk/en/research/achieving-a-sustainable-peace-in-yemen-lies-with-locally-driven-initiatives
Coppi, G. (2018). The Humanitarian Crisis in Yemen: Beyond the Man-Made Disaster. New York: International Peace Institute.
Cordesman, A. H. (2017). The War in Yemen: Hard Choices in a Hard War. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies. Recuperado de: https://www.csis.org/analysis/war-yemen-hard-choices-hard-war#:~:text=The%20Middle%20East%20is%20filled,the%20point%20of%20humanitarian%20nightmare
Deitelhoff, N. (2013). Scheitert die Norm der Schutzverantwortung? Der Streit um Normbegründung und Normanwendung der R2P. Die Friedens-Warte, 88(1/2), 17-39.
Díaz Barrado, C. M. (2012). La responsabilidad de proteger en el Derecho Internacional contemporáneo: Entre lo conceptual y la práctica internacional. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, 24, 1-40. Recuperado de: http://www.reei.org/index.php/revista/num24/articulos/responsabilidad-proteger-derecho-internacional-contemporaneo-entre-lo-conceptual-practica-internacional
Duffield, M. (2014). Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. New York: Zed Books.
Etzersdorfer, I. y Janik, R. (2016). Staat, Krieg und Schutzverantwortung. Wien: Facultas.
Freedman, L. (2019). The Future of War: A History. New York: Public Affairs.
Heinze, M.-C. (2020). Dossier Innerstaatliche Konflikte: Jemen. Recuperado de: https://www.bpb.de/internationales/weltweit/innerstaatliche-konflikte/54611/jemen
Hippler, J. (2019). Krieg im 21. Jahrhundert: Militärische Gewalt, Aufstandsbekämpfung und humanitäre Intervention. Wien: Promedia Verlag.
Homan, K. y Ducass-Rogier, M. (2012). Who’s afraid of the responsibility to protect?. The Hague: Clingendael Institute. Recuperado de: https://www.clingendael.org/publication/whos-afraid-responsibility-protect
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. (2001). The Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
Jay, M. (2020, abril 2). Saudi Arabia Looks for a Peace Deal in Yemen, But at What Price?. Inside Arabia. Recuperado de: https://insidearabia.com/saudi-arabia-looks-for-a-peace-deal-in-yemen-but-at-what-price/
Kaim, M. y Schulz, R. (2020). The EU Will Not Be Able to Enforce the UN Arms Embargo in Libya. Berlin: Stiftung für Wissenschaft und Politik. DOI:10.18449/2020C08
Kaldor, M. (2012). New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era (3ª ed.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Kaldor, M. (2013). Identity and War. Global Policy, 4(4), 336-346.
Kaldor, M. (2016). How Peace Agreements Undermine the Rule of Law in New War Settings. Global Policy, 7(2), 146-155.
Kreuter-Kirchhof, C. (2010). Völkerrechtliche Schutzverantwortung bei elementaren Menschenrechtsverletzungen: Die Responsibility to Protect als Verantwortungsstruktur. Archiv des Völkerrechts, 48(3), 338-382.
Lango, J. W. (2014). The Ethics of Armed Conflict: A Cosmopolitan Just War Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Meskell, L. (2018). A Future in Ruins: UNESCO, World Heritage, and the Dream of Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moghadam, A., y Wyss, M. (2020). The Political Power of Proxies. Why Nonstate Actors Use Local Surrogates. International Security, 44(4), 119-157.
Moravcová, Š. (2014). The Controversy over Humanitarian Intervention and Responsibility to Protect. Perspectives, 22(2), 65-86.
Morris, J. (2016). The Responsibility to Protect and the use of force: Remaking the Procrustean bed?. Cooperation and Conflict, 51(2), 200-215.
Munive, J. y Stepputat, F. (2014). Transforming Armed Non-State Actors. Copenhague: Danish Institute for International Studies. Recuperado de: https://www.diis.dk/en/research/can-you-disarm-demobilize-and-reintegrate-armed-non-state-actors
Münkler, H. (2017). Kriegssplitter: Die Evolution der Gewalt im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert. Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.
Münkler, H. (2018). Die neuen Kriege (8ª ed.). Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.
Nasser, A. (2015, agosto 26). Realignment of Yemen's identity politics. Al Jazeera. Recuperado de: https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2015/08/realignment-yemen-identity-politics-150826125518647.html
Nellemann, C., Henriksen, R., Pravettoni, R., Stewart, D., Kotsovou, M., Schlingemann, M.A.J, Shaw, M. y Reitano, T. (2018). World atlas of illicit flows. Paris: RHIPTO.
Perteghelia, A. (2018). Yemen: the Sectarianization of a Political Conflict. Recuperado de: https://www.ispionline.it/en/pubblicazione/yemen-sectarianization-political-conflict-19933
Philipsen, L. (2019). Armed Non-State Actors Need to be Included in Pragmatic Peacebuilding. Copenhague: Danish Institute for International Studies. Recuperado de: https://www.diis.dk/node/21793
Schacht, K. y Koschyk, M. (2019, noviembre 08). DW. Recuperado de: https://www.dw.com/en/how-war-has-changed-since-1989/a-51136876?maca=en-EMail-sharing
Schreinmoser, C. R. (2020). Las nuevas guerras y el patrimonio cultural material: La destrucción de los bienes culturales en los conflictos del siglo XXI; el caso del Estado Islámico. Cadernos de Dereito Actual, 13, 474-491. Recuperado de http://www.cadernosdedereitoactual.es/ojs/index.php/cadernos/article/view/496
Trenin, D. (2015). How effective are economic sanctions?. Recuperado de: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/02/how-effective-are-economic-sanctions/
United Nations. (1999). Secretary-General presents his anual report to General Assembly. Press Release, SG/SM/7136, GA/9596. Recuperado de: https://www.un.org/press/en/1999/19990920.sgsm7136.html
United Nations. (2009). Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. Report of the Secretary-General, A/63/677. Recuperado de: https://undocs.org/es/A/63/677
United Nations. (2015). Resolution 2216 (2015). Recuperado de: https://www.undocs.org/S/RES/2216%20(2015)
United Nations. (2018a). Carta de fecha 26 de enero de 2018 dirigida al Presidente del Consejo de Seguridad por el Grupo de Expertos sobre el Yemen con arreglo al mandato establecido en la resolución 2342 (2017) del Consejo de Seguridad, S/2018/594. Recuperado de: https://undocs.org/es/S/2018/594
United Nations. (2018b). Situación de los derechos humanos en el Yemen, incluidas las violaciones y conculcaciones cometidas desde septiembre de 2014: Informe del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos que contiene las conclusiones del Grupo de Eminentes Expertos Independientes Internacionales y Regionales y un resumen de la asistencia técnica prestada por la Oficina del Alto Comisionado a la Comisión Nacional de Investigación, A/HRC/39/43. Recuperado de: https://undocs.org/es/A/HRC/39/43
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2020). 2019 Yemen Country Report. Recuperado de: https://reporting.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/UNHCR%20Yemen%202019%20Annual%20Report%20-%20March%202020.pdf
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2017). Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator, Stephen O’Brien: Statement to the Security Council on Missions to Yemen, South Sudan, Somalia and Kenya and an Update on the Oslo Conference on Nigeria and the Lake Chad Region. Recuperado 04 julio 2020, de https://reliefweb.int/report/yemen/under-secretary-general-humanitarian-affairsemergency-relief-coordinator-stephen-o
von Arnauld, A. (2009). Souveränität und responsibility to protect. Die Friedens-Warte, 84(1), 11-52.
Zeino. E. (2019). Die afghanisch-pakistanischen Beziehungen: Gefangen im Sicherheitsdilemma. Kabul: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. Recuperado de: https://www.kas.de/de/web/afghanistan/laenderberichte/detail/-/content/die-afghanisch-pakistanischen-beziehungen-1