Galicia perante o reto da automatización do traballo
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Frey e Osborne (2017), utilízanse os microdatos da mostra anual da EPA entre 2011 e
2016 para determinar as características persoais e laborais que condicionan o risco de
que un traballador en Galicia sexa substituído por una máquina. Os resultados das
estimacións amosan que a probabilidade de automatización diminúe co grao de
responsabilidade, o nivel educativo, a disposición a participar en accións formativas e a
adopción de novas formas de traballo, como o teletraballo, e é comparativamente reducida
para os ocupados en educación, sanidade, servizos sociais, TIC, enerxía e actividades
artísticas ou científico-técnicas. As restantes características do traballador e da empresa
xogan un papel secundario para explicar o risco de dixitalización. Co obxectivo de atenuar
as repercusións negativas do progreso tecnolóxico sobre o emprego e acadar un
crecemento inclusivo, é imprescindible que os axentes económicos, tanto públicos como
privados, gobernen o cambio. Para acadalo, é preciso actuar en dous ámbitos
estreitamente relacionados: a educación e o mercado de traballo.
Palabras clave:
Citado por
Detalles del artículo
Referencias
Acemoglu, D., y Restrepo, P. (2017), “Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets”, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 23285.
Anghel, B., De la Rica, S., y Lacuesta, A. (2013), “Employment Polarisation in Spain over the course of the 1997-2012 cycle”, Banco de España, Documentos de Trabajo Nº. 1321.
Arntz, M., Gregory, T. y Zierahn, U. (2016), “The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 189, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Arulampalam, W. (2001), “Is Unemployment Really Scarring? Effects of Unemployment Experiences on Wages”, Economic Journal, 111 (475), F585-F606.
Autor, D. (2013), “The ‘task approach’ to labor markets: an overview”, Journal for Labour Market Research, 46(3), 185-199.
Autor, D. y Dorn, D. (2009), “This Job is 'Getting Old': Measuring Changes in Job Opportunities Using Occupational Age Structure”, American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 99(2), 45-51.
Autor, D. (2015), “Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3-30.
Autor, D. y Dorn, D. (2013), “The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market”, American Economic Review, 103(5), 1553-97.
Avent, R. (2017), The Wealth of Humans. Work and Its Absence in the Twenty-first Century. Penguin.
Baumol, W., Ferranti, D., Malach, M., Pablos-Méndez, A., Tabish, H. Y Gomory, L. (2012), The Cost Disease: Why Computers Get Cheaper and Health Care Doesn't. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Brzeski, C. y Burk, I. (2015), “The Robots Come. Consequences of Automation for the German Labour Market”, ING DiBa Economic Research.
Dauth, W. (2014), “Job Polarization on Local Labor Markets”, IAB Discussion Paper n. 18.
Doménech, R., García, J. R., Montañez, M. y Neut, A. (2018), “Afectados por la revolución digital: el caso de España”, de próxima aparición en Papeles de Economía Española.
Frey, C y Osborne, M.A. (2017), “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerization?”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 114(C), 254-280.
Gallego, A. (2017), “Ocupaciones en transformación: ¿A quién afectará el cambio tecnológico?”, Observatorio Social de la Caixa.
Goos, M., Manning, A. y Salomons, A. (2009), “Job Polarization in Europe”, American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 99 (2), 58-63.
Graetz, G. y Michaels. G. (2018), “Robots at Work”, mimeo, LSE.
Gregory, T., Salomons, A. y Zierahn, U. (2016), “Racing With or Against the Machine? Evidence from Europe”, ZEW Centre for European Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 16-053.
Harris, S. y Krueger, A. (2015), “A Proposal for Modernizing Labor Laws for Twenty-First Century Work: The Independent Worker”, The Hamilton Project, Discussion Paper 201510.
Mokyr, J., Vickers, C., y Ziebarth, N.L. (2015), “The history of technological anxiety and the future of economic growth: Is this time different?”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 31-50.
Moretti, E. (2010), “Local Multipliers”, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 100(2), 373-77.
OCDE (2017), Going Digital: The Future of Work for Women, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Pajarinen, M. y Rouvinen, P. (2014), “Computerization Threatens One Third of Finnish Employment”, ETLA Brief, No. 22.
Papke, L. y Wooldridge, J.D. (1996), “Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(K) Plan Participation Rates”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 11 (6), 619–632
World Economic Forum (2016), The Future of Jobs Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, World Economic Forum, Davos