Main Article Content

Claudio Javier Cormick
Universidad del Salvador Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas
Argentina
Biography
Vol 37 No 1 (2018), Studies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/ag.37.1.3849
Submitted: 03-01-2017 Accepted: 21-06-2017 Published: 30-11-2017
Copyright How to Cite

Abstract

In this article, we will attempt to complete the existing analysis of the relationship between Merleau-Ponty and different skeptical positions—which has been typically restricted to more “canonical” texts—on the basis of his conference about Le primat de la perception.
In that text, the phenomenologist argues against the “pessimistic induction” according to which, in light of the refutation of past scientific hypotheses, we can foresee that the current ones are false as well: turning the conclusion of this induction into its contrary, Merleau-Ponty claims that the transformations in our knowledge are a self-corrective process, such that a hypothesis is only abandoned if another one appears as a better alternative. This will lead us to problematize the notion of scientific refutation in Merleau-Ponty, who offers, as a model for epistemic progress, the mutual (“spontaneous”) substitution of perceptive beliefs, which does not involve a conscious consideration of rational criteria. As we will point out, this starting point can not be extended to the case of hypotheses which are evaluated according to their respective values.
Cited by

Article Details

References

Allen, Barry, Truth in philosophy, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1993.

Bech, Josep Maria, “El proyecto filosófico de una ‘ciencia de la pre-ciencia’”, Convivium 18, 2005.

Bimbenet, Étienne, « “La chasse sans prise” : Merleau-ponty et le projet d'une science de l'homme sans l'homme », Les études philosophiques, n° 57, 2001/2.

Cardim, Leandro Neves, “Science et philosophie chez Maurice Merleau-Ponty”, Chiasmi International, Volume 8, 2006.

Compton, John, “Merleau-Ponty’s Thesis of the Primacy of Perception and the Meaning of Scientific Objectivity”, en Pietersma (ed.), Merleau-Ponty: Critical Essays, Lanham, University Press of America, 1990.

Cormick, Claudio, “Merleau-Ponty, Foucault et l’autonomie de la conscience”, Bulletin d’analyse phénoménologique XII 6, 2016.

Descombes, Vincent, “The order of Things: An Archaeology of What?”, History and Theory, Theme Issue 54, December 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10829

Dillon, Martin, Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1988.

Flynn, Bernard, “Merleau-Ponty and the Philosophical Position of Skepticism”, en Flynn, Wayne Froman y Robert Vallier (eds.), Merleau-Ponty and the possibilities of philosophy: transforming the tradition, New York, SUNY Press, 2009.

García Canclini, N., “Crítica de la razón Cientificista. Epistemología e Historia en Merleau-Ponty”, Revista de Psicología, 1973.

Geraets, Theodor,“The Return to Perceptual Experience and the Meaning of the Primacy of Perception”, en Pietersma (ed.), Merleau-Ponty: Critical Essays (op. cit.).

Hass, Lawrence, “Merleau-Ponty and Cartesian Skepticism: Exorcising the Demon”, in Man and World 26, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273195

Kwant, Remy, The Phenomenological Philosophy of Merleau-Ponty, Pittsburgh, Duquesne University Press, 1963.

Low, Douglas, Merleau-Ponty’s Last Vision: A Proposal for the Completion of The Visible and the Invisible, Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 2000.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Phénoménologie de la perception, Paris, Gallimard, 1945 (traducción castellana: Fenomenología de la percepción, Barcelona, Planeta-Agostini, 1985).

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Les sciences de l’homme et la phénoménologie, Paris, Centre de Documentation Universitaire, 1963 (traducción castellana: Merleau-Ponty La fenomenología y las ciencias del hombre, Buenos Aires, Ed. Nova, s/f).

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Le visible et l’invisible, Paris, Gallimard, 1964 (traducción castellana: Lo visible y lo invisible, Buenos Aires, Nueva Visión, 2010).

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Le primat de la perception et ses conséquences philosophiques, Lagrasse, Verdier, 2014.

Newton-Smith, H., The rationality of science, London-New York, Routledge, 1981. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203317211

O’Connor, Dennis, “The philosophy-science nexus in the early Merleau-Ponty”, en Hugh Silverman, John Sallis y Thomas Seebohm, Continental Philosophy in America, Pittsburgh, Duquesne University Press, 1983, pp. 193-207

Pietersma, Henry, Phenomenological Epistemology, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000.

Pietersma, Henry, “Merleau-Ponty’s Theory of Knowledge”, en Pietersma (ed.), Merleau-Ponty: Critical Essays (op. cit.).

Priest, Stephen, Merleau-Ponty, London-New York, Routledge, 2000.

Ralón de Walton, Graciela, “El campo de la cultura: simbolismo y verdad a hacer”, en Ramírez, Mario Teodoro (coordinador), Merleau-Ponty viviente, Barcelona, Anthropos, 2012.

Ramírez, Teodoro, “Mundo perceptivo y mundo cultural. Merleau-Ponty y la filosofía de la cultura”, en Luis Álvarez Falcón (comp.), La sombra de lo invisible. Merleau-Ponty 1961-2011 (siete lecciones), Madrid, Eutelequia, 2011.

Sacrini, Marcus, “Merleau-Ponty’s Responses to Skepticism. A Critical Appraisal”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2013.833964

Toadvine, Ted, “Merleau-Ponty’s Reading of Husserl—A Chronological Overview”. Appendix to Merleau-Ponty’s Reading of Husserl, Ted Toadvine and Lester Embree (eds.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.