Vol 31 No 1 (2012), Studies
Submitted: 08-05-2012
Accepted: 09-05-2012
Published: 09-05-2012
This paper aims at demonstrating that in light of Simmel’s concept of ‘whole man’ or‘personality’ a certain structural isomorphism between the kantian ethical man and the economicmodern man becomes apparent. We analyze in the first place the criticism which Simmel directs from that concept at the anthropological conception presupposed in the kantianethics. In the second place, we examine the relation generated between man and cultureas a consequence of the development of money economy and of what Simmel calls ‘tragedyof culture’, seeking to demonstrate that the mentioned relation produces a type of individualitywhich, from the whole man’s point of view, appears as equivalent to the one presupposedin the kantian ethics. Finally, we compare the ways of valuation of kantian ethics and moneyeconomy with the type of normativity that suits the whole man.
G. Simmel, ‘whole man’, kantian ethics, developed money economy, praxis and poiesis, tragedy of culture, anarchic sensibility, naturalized life, abstract logic, individual law, objective ties