THE IMPORTANCE OF THE REGIONS’ ECONOMIC ACTIVITY EVALUATION IN RUSSIA, 2012-2016

Barra de artigos

PDF (English)
Publicado: 03-12-2017

Contido principal do artigo

Vladimir Viktorovich KURCHENKOV
Department of State and Municipal Administration, Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russian Federation
Federação Russa
Olga Vladimirovna FETISOVA
Department of State and Municipal Administration, Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russian Federation
Federação Russa
Anastasiya Andreyevna ORLOVA
Department of State and Municipal Administration, Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russian Federation
Federação Russa
Elena Andreevna GLADKAYA
Department of State and Municipal Administration, Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russian Federation
Federação Russa
v. 26 n. 3 (2017), Articles, páginas 33-44
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/rge.26.3.4458
Recibido: 03-12-2017 Aceito: 03-12-2017 Publicado: 03-12-2017
Direitos de Autor Como Citar

Resumo

The article presents the systems of evaluating the regions’ economic activity, which
comprise various components. The regions’ economic activity evaluation is done mostly
through different rankings, which can generally be classified into: global and national. The
analysis of the rankings’ dynamics in 2012-2016 has shown that the Russian innovation
activity is rising on the international level. Such a tendency is considered to be positive in
the modern economic conditions, however the innovation activity needs to be accelerated.
According to the national level rankings, there are 3 regions in the Russian Federation,
which managed to apply their innovation potential better than other Russian Federation
regions. Thus, various level rankings help defining the strengths and weaknesses of a
region’s innovation development, that in future can become the basis for leading
coordinated innovation policy.

Palavras-chave:

innovations, innovation activity, rating analysis, innovation activity evaluation methods.
plugins.generic.citations.citedby

Detalles do artigo

Referências

Antonenko, I. (2014). Innovation Development Sectoral Trajectories Of The South Russian Regions. Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies. Vol. 14-2, pp. 31-34.

Bloomberg Innovation Index (2017) URL: https://www.bloomberg.com.

Bobrov, V.S. (2016). The Problems of Developing Small Enterprises’ Innovative Activity. Naukapark. No. 5, (46), p. 22-25.

Deinega, V.G. (2008). National Innovation System’ Regional Structure Formation Features. A Region’s Economic Development: Problems, Searches, Perspectives: Yearbook, Issue. 9. Volgograd: VolSU Publishing House, p. 273-289.

Duplenko, N.G, Smirnova, O.S. (2016). Industry and Regional Analysis of the Russian Enterprises’ Innovation Activity. I. Kant Baltic Federal University Science Journal. I. Kant. Series: Humanities And Social Sciences, No. 2, p. 85-95.

Global Innovation Index (2017) URL: http://www.globalinnovationindex.org.

Grabowska, M. (2014). Selected directions in analysis of innovative activities in enterprises. Applied Mechanics and Materials, Т. 718, pp.50-55.

Hayek F. (1989). Competition as the Opening Procedure. World Economy and International Relations, № 12, p. 6–14.

Innovations (2016). URL: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/science_and_innovations/science/#

Kiselev, V.N. (2010). Russian Federation Regions’ Innovation Activity Comparative Analysis. Innovations, No. 4 (138). p. 17-24.

Krainov, A.E. (2014). Innovation activity as an Enterprise’s Management System Formation Factor. Modern Economics: Expertise, problems and development perspectives, № 3, pp. 77-81.

Kurchenkov V.V. (2013). Enterprises’ Innovation Activity in Terms of Global Competition. Innovations, №5 (175), p. 60-65.

Kurchenkov, V.V., Ovshinov, S.A. (2011) Definition of an Industrial Enterprise’s Production Modernization Optimal Variant. Volgograd Institute of Business Science Journal . Business. Education. Law, No. 3 (16), p. 43-50.

Lebedeva, N.N. (2010). Enterprises’ Innovation Activity as Their Competitiveness Condition. Institutional Research Journal, Volume 2., No. 4, p. 15-21.

Mochalova, K.M., Petergova, A.V. (2015). Industrial Enterprises Innovation Activity Development Directions. Moscow State Technical University Izvestiya MAMI. T. 5, No. 4 (26), pp. 237-241.

National Association of Innovation and Information Technology Development (NAIRIT) (2015) URL: http://www.nair-it.ru/news/31.07.2015/461

Pavlycheva, A.V. (2016) Russian Enterprises’ Innovation Activity. Novainfo.ru. N 1, No. 46, p. 67-72.

Plotnikov, V., Fedotova, G., Popkova, E., Kastyurina, A. (2015). Harmonization of Strategic Planning Indicators of Territories’ Socioeconomic Growth. Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Vol. 15-2, pp. 105-114.

Rubino, F.E., Rija, M., Bronzetti, G., Sicoli, G., Tenuta, P. (2016) An innovative model for a sustainability report in no-profit organizations. Source of the DocumentInternational Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, N 13 (2-3), pp. 119-134

Russian Federation Regions’ Innovation Development Ranking (2016) URL: https://www.hse.ru/primarydata/rir2016

Russia’s Innovative Regions Ranking (2016) URL: http://iregions.org/images/files/presentations/AIRR_26.12.pdf.

Volgograd Oblast Innovative Development Strategy until 2025 : monography / Authors Team Chief O.V. Inshakov. Volgograd: VolSU Publishing house, 2009. - 224 p.

Volgograd Oblast Innovative Development Strategy until 2025 : monography / Authors Team Chief O.V. Inshakov. Volgograd: VolSU Publishing house, 2008. - 356 p.

Zedtwitz, M. A., Corsi, S.,Soberg, P.V., Frega, R. (2016). Typology of reverse innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, N 32 (1), pp. 12-28.