1. INTRODUCTION
Small-medium enterprises (SMEs) are widely recognized as crucial contributors to sustainable economic development in countries around the world (). Considering the fact that SMEs make up 90% of global business operations, it is essential to prioritize their sustainability and performance for a country's economic well-being. The condition of SMEs in Indonesia is of utmost importance for the continuity of the Indonesian economy (). In Indonesia, SMEs need to improve their performance to remain competitive amid volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) circumstances () and health crises, such as the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) (). This pandemic has had an impact not only on Indonesia, but also on global social inequalities and business-customer relationships (; ). SMEs in developing countries, such as Indonesia, encounter significant challenges that require careful consideration (). First, in said country, these companies may have resource constraints that could lead to support products and services failing to be competitive, which may make it challenging for them to penetrate the market and establish a superior position in the consumer market (). SMEs in European countries are often able to leverage their competitive advantages (). Nevertheless, Indonesian ones may face certain challenges when it comes to managing their business operations, due to a family-based approach that is often followed to fill strategic positions, sometimes prioritizing emotional relationships over competency as a result, hindering effective decision-making (). In addition, these SMEs may struggle to absorb knowledge and information from the market, resulting in slower maneuvering responses to competitive and consumer market dynamics (). The market may face disequilibrium due to the potential entry of new competitors. The business services sector in Indonesia has been adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic () along with the added threat of new entrants (), in that the position of companies has changed in the consumer market.
Numerous studies have investigated the role that entrepreneurial orientation (EO) plays for SMEs to improve their long-term marketing performance (MP) (; ), particularly in developing countries (; ). For this reason, we have identified certain limitations and challenges for EO research. First, the unclear impacts of EO on SME performance, especially on micro businesses in Indonesia, is our reason for extending the study of the EO concept’s application. What is required is better knowledge on EO development and its relative impact on the performance of these microbusinesses. Second, discrepancies remain in the research findings of EO and performance, where some studies have found that the former concept does not fully improve the latter(; ), while other studies have revealed a causal relationship between EO and SME performance (; ; ). To bridge the relationship gap, our study introduces marketing maneuverability (MM) as a mediator between EO and MP. MM refers to a firm's ability to use effective marketing strategies to achieve its targets. Grounded on the Resource-Advantage theory (R-A theory), we propose that MM could mediate the EO-MP relationship. Therefore, SMEs could benefit from a marketing approach to more effectively navigate market provocation and allow marketing to significantly aid the long-term survival of SMEs, particularly micro-businesses ().
This study has three main contributions: first, it explains the benefits of supporting the application of the Resource Advantage (R-A) theory to a broader area of micro business. Second, it aims to enrich research on micro businesses in developing countries. Third, it focuses on the barbershop industry, particularly Madurese salons ('Indonesian-Madurese ethnic') that are SMEs. By selecting these establishments, the findings should provide practical relevance to micro businesses in other developing countries, being representative of micro-businesses in Indonesia. The Madurese are known as migrant entrepreneurs who work in barbery and catering. The ownership of a barbershop business has traditionally been passed down from one generation to the next. The R-A theory provides a solid foundation for the MM capabilities of Madurese barbershops, offering a comparative and competitive advantage that helps them maintain their position in the consumer market. Furthermore, our study aims to provide empirical evidence of the relationship between EO, MP, and MM for micro businesses.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1. MARKETING MANEUVERABILITY
R-A theory provides a foundation for this study, since firms must continuously improve their competencies and knowledge to cause disequilibrium in the market (). This theory assumes that firms need to categorize and manage markets effectively to maintain their position in the consumer market (). We believe that this can be achieved if the MM concept is implemented by businesses, especially micro businesses, which may need MM to accomplish many of their operations. MM could encourage business owners to hone and utilize their marketing skills and have a competitive edge in the market. MM stimulates entrepreneurial behavior, which can lead to superior marketing performance if they manage their comparative resources successfully.
This body of research proposes MM as a construct that mutually influences SMEs, particularly micro businesses. It uses R-A theory to develop an MM model because it considers that firms require comparative capability capital to deal with competitive dynamics and any changes in their consumer market position. Comparative advantage helps companies maneuver according to consumer market demand. In addition, the R-A theory reminds companies to continually improve their products and services to be able to handle competitors and excel competitively in the consumer market ().
This paper offers the MM concept as a solution for companies to use should they wish to gain a higher MP. It can also be a marketing solution for firms who encounter obstacles with marketing strategies, which could mean they reign victorious in the consumer market (). Our study defines marketing maneuverability as "the ability of firms to use a variety of marketing approaches to respond quickly and surprisingly to competitors' actions and market demands so that firms can drive market growth and maintain their position in the consumer market". MM is a firm's ability to make effective and appropriate marketing decisions among various successful marketing campaigns in consumer markets, where MM practices make their implementation more effective to respond to competitors' offensive strategies and strengthen customer retention in consumer markets (). The concept of MM appears to be adopted by companies who are faced with multi-market competitive conditions, where the likelihood of rapid growth and long-term business sustainability is higher (). The speed and surprise dimensions in MM could be considered the primary elements of business maneuvers (). The speed dimension refers to a company's actions as a reaction or initiative to seize potential opportunities, ensuring the successful penetration of the market according to the company's plan (). The surprise dimension in MM may be perceived as an action that customers may not have been expecting, which would lead to the feeling that they were experiencing the best service possible (). The element of surprise in MM's strategy is a successful marketing tactic that can be difficult for competitors to generalize. According to the literature the ability for a company to surprise is also the reason why it is always one step ahead of its competitors at every step of the way ().
2.2. ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND MARKETING MANEUVERABILITY
The concept of EO has evolved as a guide for business owners in their decision-making processes and to help them meet their companies’ main competitive advantage and company performance goals (). It makes companies, especially SMEs, realize that they have limited resources, so management is encouraged to allocate them carefully to take advantage of any external opportunity to achieve optimal performance. EO is the key to accomplishing this and developing a relatively precise marketing strategy. EO seeks to pursue market opportunities and penetrate operating areas in existing markets. At the micro-business level, it plays a role in identifying performance determinants and helping business owners improve their growth (; ). EO also encourages firms to improve their skills and Its adoption is likely to be an obstacle to micro businesses wishing to take advantage of external opportunities in the consumer market (). EO is the process of exploiting the external opportunities of SMEs, and it helps companies create strategic policies and practices to identify and launch innovative and valuable product innovation in consumer markets.
Previous research has revealed that EO enhances the strategic posture of SMEs, which is needed for their success. It has been found that EO builds up business leaders’ confidence which helps them improve their entrepreneurial skills to achieve their goals (). It also plays a part in conceptualizing MM that allow micro businesses to fully exploit external opportunities. It is important for companies to ensure that their decisions are in line with their goals (; ). EO can help guide the application of MM strategies and improve a company's competitive position (). It is a significant factor that can help micro-level entrepreneurs navigate market entry effectively because triumph is frequently linked with competitive drive (). Hence, the implementation of EO in MM has the potential to aid the sustainability of micro businesses (; ). Based on the findings, the proposed hypothesis is:
2.3. MARKETING MANEUVERABILITY AND SERVICE ENCOUNTER VALUE
Our study considers service encounter value (SEV) as a framework for SMEs in the barbershop industry which allows value and agility to be created for service providers who in turn should be able to stably maintain continuous quality, yet dynamically develop more innovative products according to customer expectations and perceptions (). The SEV framework helps companies standardize operations while distinguishing themselves for their customer service. It supports organizations in both resisting and adapting to change, enabling them to seize new opportunities that cater specifically to satisfying customer needs (). SEV is a powerful weapon for companies seeking to survive in the competitive marketplace, transforming service encounters to keep pace with change and seize external opportunities from customer responses (; ). By focusing on customer reactions, SEV makes companies more open to listening to the complaints and needs of the target market. SEV is a driving factor for this because it creates conditions for companies and customers to consciously build strong networking and social listening, making it more likely that consumers’ preferences are directed towards their products (). Our body of research, based on the premise of R-A theory, aims to demonstrate that SEV can be a valuable for companies in the consumer market. For micro businesses, their competitive advantage in the face of multi-market competition is the synergy between MM and SEV (). Against this background, the proposed hypothesis is:
2.4. MARKETING MANEUVERABILITY AND MARKET PENETRATION ADVANTAGE
Competition in the market can sometimes lead to disequilibrium in market conditions as each player strives to innovate with high-quality products and services (). It can be challenging for micro businesses to be in an ideal situation in such an environment. Market penetration advantage (MPA) is considered crucial for companies or business, which act as 'controlling' entities over products and competitors in the consumer market (). Our study assumes that at the micro-business level, MPA is still necessary not only to perform the control function but also to increase the bargaining power of micro businesses in the market (). MPA refers to a company's competitive ability to achieve short-term goals, particularly for SMEs, by protecting their territory from competitors' threats. To increase sales growth in existing markets, companies require market penetration, while broader market development requires marketing strategies (). The intensive strategy required by a company to support MPA is known as MM. Companies may consider adjusting their marketing strategies to meet the unique demands of each segment (). The marketing mix can provide an advantage in terms of products and services, and allow these businesses to be the first to market theirs, which can facilitate market penetration (). The utilization of MM and MPA has the potential to enhance the negotiating power of micro businesses with their sales networks and consumers in the market (). The success of MPA is contingent upon the implementation of MM by SMEs. Our study suggests that the effectiveness of MPA can be determined by the utilization of MM, which can help micro businesses achieve their objectives. As such, we hypothesize that:
2.5. MARKETING MANEUVERABILITY AND MARKETING PERFORMANCE
Our research builds upon the concept of MM by incorporating the military paradigm, which states that military attacks prioritize low maneuverability to achieve effective target interception. This is accomplished with cooperative strategies and integrated methods to produce strong maneuverability (). Our study suggests that MM can be aligned with business logic and R-A theory, where companies can execute strategic maneuvers to develop scalable and sustainable business models that can achieve sustainable market power (G. ; ). To enhance marketing performance, companies are encouraged to utilize the knowledge and insights which they gain from the market (). They allocate resources carefully, such as marketing capabilities, financial assets market information, and branding, to the relevant sectors to ensure that their operations are secure in the dynamic market environment (; ; ). Companies maneuver, therefore, to expand to uncharted territories where they want to market their products or services, while preserving their current customer base (). For SMEs taking on new ventures which have external challenges that may be detrimental to their marketing performance, MM should be adopted so that they can intensify their exploitable and profitable explorations of marketing opportunities (; ; ). Therefore, the proposed hypothesis is:
2.6. ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND MARKETING PERFORMANCE
EO refers to how firms adapt to the dynamic external and competitive environment. This research on the role of EO is important because it can help firms understand and develop appropriate strategies to achieve a competitive edge (). In response to competition and market changes, EO encourages business owners to innovate their models. It helps increase the likelihood that firms can continuously innovate according to the changing dynamics of the market. Volatile markets create new opportunities for business ventures to build new business models. EO is the tendency of firms to pursue sustainable behavior that is risky, innovative, and proactive. It is an important organizational resource for creating a sustainable competitive advantage and improving firm performance ().. It also helps to improve a firm's networking capabilities and knowledge and can ultimately improve marketing performance, since EO enhances SMEs' ability to align their business models with market demands, (). EO has a positive impact on the relationship between business model innovation and marketing performance (). Based on the findings, the proposed hypothesis is:
2.7. SERVICE ENCOUNTER VALUE AND MARKETING PERFORMANCE
Companies often find that SEV is necessary to achieve their goals. It includes not only interpersonal interactions but also the social context in which customers and service providers strive to fulfill psychosocial needs and interact with each other (; ). Hence, SEV places emphasis on the customer's role to enlarge the simple concept of exchange between the company and its customers as a constellation of values (). The concept of value in marketing involves subjective matters that connect SEV with values regarded highly by consumers. The emotional valence resulting from this connection can greatly affect consumer behavior, making it a key consideration for companies (). In R-A theory, SEV is considered a marketing strategy tool to control consumers' moods after they use a company's products and services, with the aim of eliciting positive interactions from the consumer market (). Macro businesses may benefit from SEV when market uncertainty due to their professional competence is questioned. It is believed that consumers' emotional experience and expression can influence service interactions and their potential impact on the company (; ; ). Therefore, SEV may be considered a leveraging factor that can improve marketing performance (; ; ), particularly in macro businesses. This leads us to the following hypothesis:
2.8. MARKET PENETRATION ADVANTAGE AND MARKETING PERFORMANCE
Companies often seek to gain MPA, which could be seen as an extension of their marketing strategy, in order to achieve their goals (). As noted by , a well-crafted strategy can help an organization attain a favorable position in a competitive environment. The main goal of MPA is to investigate specific consumer demand information to achieve a competitive advantage. By offering products and services that meet the needs of the target market, companies can create value. MPA can help them utilize market information to create a range of tailor-made products based on market demand (). By determining the success of these tailor-made product MPA can assist companies in capturing new opportunities, such as gaining new customers, increasing profit, and improving demand (C. L. (Eunice) ). This study proposes that MPA is a competitive resource and an enabler for firms that can be a driving factor for strong marketing performance (; ). With this in mind, the proposed hypothesis is:
3. RESEARCH METHOD
3.1. SAMPLE AND DATA COLLECTION
In order to examine what factors influence MM and what its outcomes are, this study proposed a predictive model. We collected data from 257 managers or owners of Madurese barbershop ('Indonesian-Madurese ethnic') SMEs in five cities (Semarang, Ungaran, Salatiga, Demak, and Kendal) in Central Java Province, Indonesia. We adopted a non-probability purposive sampling method to select respondents because the population was unknown. This stemmed from our finding that they have no legal association, so the exact number of Madurese Barbershop SMEs is unknown. In addition, they belong to an informal institution, in the form of a community of Madurese barbershop SMEs. It is worth noting that they are migrant business holders, often moving from one location to another, making it difficult to collect data and monitor their development and they are male-dominated. This is due to a tradition in Madurese culture where the knowledge of barbery is only passed on to men, representing a form of male responsibility for their families. Madurese culture encourages men to become migrant entrepreneurs and move around Indonesia. The study criteria comprised the owners or managers of Madurese barbershop SMEs who had been running their businesses for more than 3 years. Data collection for this study was conducted from October 2023 to April 2024 with face-to-face interviews. Trained enumerators administered a structured questionnaire to gather data from participants. Given the absence of an exact population count for Madurese barbershops in Indonesia, enumerators approached participants via their community networks. This method ensured a representative sample and reliable data collection. The questionnaire draft was translated from English into Indonesian and evaluated for content validity by an Indonesian academic expert. The revised questionnaires were then back translated into English by a certified translator to ensure that the meaning of each construct item remained intact, and finally, the validated Indonesian version was ready to be distributed.
3.2. DEVELOPMENT OF MEASUREMENT ITEMS
A survey questionnaire was utilized in this study, which included a 10-point semantic differential scale ranging from 'strongly disagree' to 'strongly agree'. The items were adapted from previous literature on EO, MM, strategic entrepreneurial orientation (SEO), MPA, and marketing performance (MP). The measurement of EO was based on five items adapted from () and (), which assessed innovativeness, proactiveness, risk-taking, competitive aggressiveness, and firm autonomy. MM was calculated with five items adapted from various sources (; ; ). MM is a variable that measures a company's response to competitors' strategies, their attitude toward competition, their speed in handling complaints, their operational flexibility, and their network collaboration. SEV was analyzed with five items adapted from (; ). SEV measures the functional, emotional, social, epistemic, and economic value of a company's products and services MPA was assessed with four items adapted from (). The concept of MPA encompasses several factors, including first-mover advantage, the speed of product launches, information acquisition, and new demand creation. Finally, MP was evaluated with five items adapted from (). These items included company performance in terms of sales growth, profit margins, products and services, product value, and market coverage. Items could be removed when they did not meet the criteria during model evaluation. However, since the relationship between constructs and indicators in this research was reflective, the removal of some indicators was not a significant issue. However, the remaining indicators were able to describe the constructs effectively (). Table 1 presents the measurement items used in this study.
4. DATA ANALYSIS
This study used Partial Least Square - Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) to rigorously analyze complex relationships between latent variables, contributing to the field's knowledge base (). Evaluating the PLS-SEM results involved two steps: first, assessing the measurement models (Outer Model) for validity and reliability; and second, evaluating the structural model (Inner Model) for testing the hypotheses ().
4.1. OUTER MODEL
The inner model analysis commenced with an examination of loading indicators and construct reliability, detailed in Table 1. Adhering to established thresholds, successful indicators require loadings greater than 0.708, while acceptable levels for composite reliability should be above 0.7 (). In this analysis, items EO5, MM5, SEV4, and SEV5 were removed from the model, since they failed to meet the loading indicator criteria. Nevertheless, all constructs successfully met the criteria for composite reliability, indicating overall fit in these aspects of the model.
The subsequent phase in the inner model analysis involved assessing construct validity, encompassing both convergent and discriminant validity. Convergent validity was confirmed with Average Variance Extracted (AVE) values exceeding 0.5, while discriminant validity was established with Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) ratios below 0.85 (). According to Table 2, both AVE and HTMT criteria were met, indicating that all constructs in the model were valid.
4.2. INNER MODEL
Following the validation and reliability confirmation of the indicators and constructs in the research, the assessment of the outer model began with an examination of indicator multicollinearity (). The model required Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) values to be below 3 to indicate that there were no concerns regarding multicollinearity. As shown in Table 3, all VIF scores in this study were below 3, confirming that multicollinearity was not an issue in this model.
In this study, the significance and magnitude of the structural path coefficients were assessed using a bootstrap method with 5,000 subsamples. This number of subsamples was chosen to enhance the precision and reliability of the estimates, minimizing bias and variance. This approach aligns with statistical best practices, ensuring robust confidence intervals and reliable significance tests, particularly in complex models (). Hypotheses were considered supported when the t-values exceeded 1.65 (one-tailed approach) and when p-values were below 0.05. The coefficients, or beta values, denoted the direction of influence. Table 4 and Figure 2 display these coefficients, t-values, and significance levels (p-values). The results indicate that while hypothesis 5 was not supported, all the other hypotheses were.
4.3. EXPLANATORY POWER, PREDICTIVE RELEVANCE AND EFFECT SIZE
The coefficient of determination (R2) in this study measured the explanatory power of the PLS structural model, where the higher the R2 values were, the greater the explanatory and predictive accuracy for endogenous constructs were. R2 values were considered substantial, moderate, and weak at 0.75, 0.50, and 0.25, respectively. Figure 1 presents the coefficient determination of the construct.
Blindfolding was used to evaluate the model's predictive relevance (Q2). A Q2 value greater than zero signified acceptable predictive accuracy for an endogenous construct. Table 5 presents the coefficient determination and predictive relevance of this study.
Construct | R2 | Q2 |
---|---|---|
EO | (independent) | 0.521 |
MM | 0.426 | 0.519 |
MP | 0.385 | 0.287 |
MPA | 0.106 | 0.359 |
SEV | 0.030 | 0.244 |
Additionally, the effect size (f2) assessed the impact of removing an exogenous construct from the model, with 0.02, 0.15, and 0.35 indicating low, medium, and high effects, respectively (). Table 6 displays the effect size of each construct.
Path | f2 | Conclusion |
---|---|---|
EO MM | 0.742 | High |
MM SEV | 0.031 | Low |
MM MPA | 0.119 | Low |
MM MP | 0.031 | Low |
EO MP | 0.002 | No effect |
SEV MP | 0.022 | Low |
MPA MP | 0.355 | High |
In this research, the observed R2 values for all dependent variables were below 0.50, indicating a modest level of explanatory power. Despite the lower magnitudes of R2, which would suggest limited variance in the dependent variables being accounted for by the model, the positive values of Q2 across the board signify that the model retained predictive relevance. This is an important aspect, as it demonstrates the model's capability to predict the dependent variables with a high degree of accuracy. Furthermore, although most F2 values were low, indicating minimal effect sizes, the overall positive predictive relevance (Q2) and the moderate explanatory power (R2) still affirmed the utility and validity of the research. Therefore, even with the limitations in explanatory power and effect size, this study offers meaningful insights and contributes to the field, underlining its value and applicability.
4.4. MEDIATION EFFECT TEST
In this study, mediation analysis was utilized to explore the mechanisms underlying the influence of EO on MP. Although the direct relationship posited in Hypothesis 5 (EO MP) was not supported, subsequent mediation testing revealed that MM served as a full mediator in this relationship. This mediation effect is detailed in Table 7, which demonstrates that EO did not directly affect MP but indirectly did with MM, highlighting the full mediation effect where the presence of MM accounted for the entire relationship between EO and MP.
Path | Direct effect | Med | Indirect effect | Conclusion | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
t-value | t-value | |||||
EO MP | -0.045 | 0.645 | MM | 0.121** | 2.496 | Full mediation |
5. RESULTS
The findings indicate strong relationships among constructs, with several hypotheses being supported, and one key relationship notably mediated. A strong and positive relationship was established between EO and MM (Hypothesis 1, = 0.653, p < 0.001, t-value = 14.822), demonstrating that an increase in EO significantly enhanced MM. The influence of MM on SEV (Hypothesis 2, = 0.173, p = 0.002, t-value = 2.818) and MPA (Hypothesis 3, = 0.326, p < 0.001, t-value = 5.914) was also supported, underscoring MM's role in enhancing both SEV and MPA. MM's direct impact on MP was also significant (Hypothesis 4, = 0.186, p = 0.005, t-value = 2.558), as was the relationship between SEV and MP (Hypothesis 6, = 0.120, p = 0.016, t-value = 2.138), and between MPA and MP (Hypothesis 7, = 0.653, p < 0.001, t-value = 14.822). However, the direct influence of EO on MP was not supported (Hypothesis 5, = -0.045, p = 0.259, t-value = 0.645), suggesting that EO alone did not significantly affect MP. Crucially, a mediation analysis revealed that MM fully mediated the relationship between EO and MP ( = 0.121, p < 0.01, t-value = 2.496). This finding indicates that the impact of EO on MP occurred with MM, illustrating MM's critical role in leveraging EO to enhance MP.
6. DISCUSSION
This paper has examined the concepts of EO, MM, SEV, and MPA in the context of Madurese barbershop SMEs. The study has presented the initial mechanism of the MM concept as a mediator in the relationship between EO and MP. Four out of the six hypotheses in this study have proposed new relationships in the development of the MM concept. This study has proposed that MM is significant for a conclusive relationship between SEV and MPA being created and in turn can improve marketing performance. The impact of EO appears to have been greater when mediated by MM, which effectively integrated the concepts of SEV and MPA,. Furthermore, SEV seems to have had a greater influence on MPA when it mediated the relationship between MM and MP. Overall, EO appears to have had the greatest influence on MP with MM and SEV pathways.
This research model has made EO the main factor influencing other variables. The model has proposed that SMEs that take risks in their business are encouraged to proactively acquire new customers by responding quickly to their complaints. This approach enables SMEs to provide customers with a valuable product that fits within their budget, ultimately increasing its value, which is the dominant indicator in the marketing performance construct. Moreover, this research has found a correlation between EO and MM, which are both essential in determining a firm's ability to remain competitive in the consumer market. It is important for companies to dominate the market to achieve a competitive position, even if it is temporary. EO can drive MM by enhancing their agility and innovativeness even when they penetrate into their competitors' territory and strengthen their valuable services to the target market.
The study's acceptance of Hypothesis 1 signifies that there was a relationship between the EO and MM concepts. Further, the result of Hypothesis 2 indicates that the creation of EO was possible with the support of the MM concept. This finding also applied to Hypothesis 3, where MM supported the MPA efforts of companies in consumer markets. The test results for hypotheses 1, 2, and 3 were consistent with the findings of previous studies (; ; ; ; ). Additionally, the results of Hypothesis 4 supported the mediating and direct role of the MM concept in linking MM and MP. However, those of Hypothesis 5 suggest that EO in this study did not improve marketing performance in SMEs, which differed from the findings of and . Moreover, the findings of Hypotheses 6 and 7 indicate that SEV and MPS empirically emerged as leverage tools to improve MP in SMEs ().
6.1. THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS
The study has sought to expand on the R-A theory by exploring the relationships between MM, SEV, and MPA. Following the R-A theory, customer information is critical to the firm, so the competence of firms when it comes to obtaining information encourages their MPA to be more creative than their competitors with the products and services that they offer (; ). Here, SEV serves as a means for companies to gather information from customers and MM plays a crucial role in enhancing their ability to adapt and innovate in response to the actions of their customers and competitors. Furthermore, MM enables SEV to create value by providing unique service operations for the consumer market, where the creation of the latter concept comes from the company's tangible and intangible resources (). MM can act as a comparative resource to support the achievement of higher SEV and MPA, which is formed in the testing of new ideas and breakthroughs, the search for creative methods, and the introduction of new processes in market penetration, which subsequently increases the company's market share. In turn, MM can contribute to superior marketing performance being attained for SMEs.
6.2. BUSINESS IMPLICATIONS
Concerning the practical implications of our study, Madurese barbershop SMEs should improve their marketing performance and focus on implementing modern marketing strategies to better serve their customers. This research framework may provide guidance for MM strategies by presenting two approaches to achieve the desired marketing performance. Firstly, owners of these establishments may consider taking calculated risks to modify their strategies by introducing new products or services while still maintaining their classic hairdressing model. They could consider implementing changes to both retain current customers and attract new ones, including those from the millennial demographic. Additionally, offering flexible services such as home visits and a reservation system could help reduce waiting times and improve overall customer satisfaction. Finally, enhancing customer interactions could further improve the overall experience and foster a mutually beneficial relationship.
7. LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH
As with other studies, this paper has its limitations. Firstly, although it is representative of SMEs, a larger sample across different industries would ensure the generalizability of the findings. Secondly, academics could use other techniques such as interviews and experiments to gain deeper insights into the topic. Thirdly, the role of MM should not just be developed in one sector, such as barbershops, but venture further afield into industries such as food and beverages, hospitality and transport. The concept of marketing maneuverability should be researched in different contexts and industries. In addition, the definition of MM may vary according to the objects and locations of the study. Finally, future research could further explore the elements of MM and its impact on increasing MP.
8. CONCLUSION
This study has contributed to the existing body of knowledge on the role of MM in the context of Madurese barbershop SMEs. It has presented a comprehensive framework for measuring the relationship between EO, MM and MP, as well as the impact of MM as a novelty marketing strategy to increase MP. The empirical results have further explored the relationship linking EO and MP by incorporating the role of MM. The MM concept is considered a useful construct for building an integrated model with SEV and MPA as leverage factors to boost marketing performance. This mutually influencing relationship can potentially be implemented into other research areas. The research has supported the R-A theory as a valuable competitive strategy for understanding company problems and strategies. Furthermore, the MM concept, based on the R-A theory, has the potential to deliver a solution to the problems of EO and MP. Intense competition and dynamic changes in the business environment call for adaptive, flexible, and responsive marketing strategies. SMEs need marketing management to offer alternative solutions to sales and marketing activities. Their owners view marketing management as a comparative resource that is innovative and proactive. They also consider that the adoption of marketing management is crucial for launching high-quality resources and products and services onto the market. These strategies are fundamental to be able to respond well to VUCA changes and create value for companies’ products in the consumer market ().
Authors contribution
Conceptualization, A.S and I.M.S.; methodology, A.S.; formal Analysis, A.S.; Writing-original draft preparation, A.S.; Writing-review and editing, I.M.S; Methodology, A.S.; Validation, I.M.S.; Software, A, S.; Project Administration, A.S.; Resources, A.S..; Visualization, A.S.; Data Processing, A.S.; Writing-review & editing, I.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript
References
1
Abdelilah, B., El Korchi, A., & Balambo, M. A. (2018). Flexibility and agility: evolution and relationship. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(7), 1138–1162. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0090
2
Agag, G., Shehawy, Y. M., Almoraish, A., Eid, R., Chaib Lababdi, H., Gherissi Labben, T., & Abdo, S. S. (2024). Understanding the relationship between marketing analytics, customer agility, and customer satisfaction: A longitudinal perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 77, 103663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103663
3
Agostini, L., Nosella, A., Sarala, R., & Nkeng, C. (2023). Emerging trends around strategic flexibility: a systematic review supported by bibliometric techniques. Management Decision, 62(13), 46–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2023-0135
4
Alghamdi, OmarA., & Agag, G. (2024). Competitive advantage: A longitudinal analysis of the roles of data-driven innovation capabilities, marketing agility, and market turbulence. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, 103547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103547
5
Ali, F., Tauni, M. Z., & Ali, A. (2022). The Big Five dyad congruence and compulsive buying: A case of service encounters. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68, 103007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103007
6
Alonso-Dos-Santos, M., & Llanos-Contreras, O. (2019). Family business performance in a post-disaster scenario: The influence of socioemotional wealth importance and entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Research, 101, 492–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.057
7
Amoedo, J. M., & Sánchez-Carreira, M. del C. (2023). Os efectos iniciais da Covid-19 nas desigualdades de renda en Galicia e a súa distribución na sociedade. Revista Galega de Economía, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.15304/rge.32.1.8551
8
Arslan, A., Kamara, S., Tian, A. Y., Rodgers, P., & Kontkanen, M. (2024). Marketing agility in underdog entrepreneurship: A qualitative assessment in post-conflict Sub-Saharan African context. Journal of Business Research, 173, 114488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114488
9
Asseraf, Y., & Shoham, A. (2019). Crafting strategy for international marketing: outside-in or inside-out? International Marketing Review, 36(6), 859–886. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-01-2018-0016
10
Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2021). Knowledge complexity and firm performance: evidence from the European SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(4), 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2020-0178
11
Bachmann, J.-T., Ohlies, I., & Flatten, T. (2021). Effects of entrepreneurial marketing on new ventures’ exploitative and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of competitive intensity and firm size. Industrial Marketing Management, 92, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.10.002
12
Bernoster, I., Mukerjee, J., & Thurik, R. (2020). The role of affect in entrepreneurial orientation. Small Business Economics, 54(1), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0116-3
13
Boaventura, P. S. M., Abdalla, C. C., Araujo, C. L., & Arakelian, J. S. (2018). Value Co-Creation in the Specialty Coffee Value Chain: The Third-Wave Coffee Movement. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 58(3), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020180306
14
Calvo Dopico, D., Del Castillo Puente, Á. M., & Arias Montero, S. R. (2021). Estrategias de marketing de marcas globales y locales en economías en desarrollo: un estudio comparativo en el mercado de chocolate de Ecuador. Revista Galega de Economía, 30(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.15304/rge.30.4.7824
15
Cao, G., & Tian, N. (2020). Enhancing customer-linking marketing capabilities using marketing analytics. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(7), 1289–1299. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-09-2019-0407
16
Chahal, H., Gupta, M., Lonial, S., & Raina, S. (2019). Operational flexibility-entrepreneurial orientation relationship: Effects and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 105, 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.011
17
Chen, Z., Yu, J., Dong, X., & Ren, Z. (2021). Three-dimensional cooperative guidance strategy and guidance law for intercepting highly maneuvering target. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 34(5), 485–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.12.014
18
Chereau, P., & Meschi, P.-X. (2019). The performance implications of the strategy–business model fit. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 26(3), 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-04-2018-0122
19
Ciabuschi, F., Baraldi, E., Lindahl, O., & Callegari, S. (2020). Supporting innovation against the threat of antibiotic resistance: Exploring the impact of public incentives on firm performance and entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Research, 112, 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.021
20
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
21
D’Angelo, A., & Presutti, M. (2019). SMEs international growth: The moderating role of experience on entrepreneurial and learning orientations. International Business Review, 28(3), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.12.006
22
Demirci, E. Z., & Erkip, N. (2024). Integrating efforts for product development and market penetration. European Journal of Operational Research, 312(3), 927–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.07.017
23
Du, Y., & Kim, P. H. (2021). One size does not fit all: Strategy configurations, complex environments, and new venture performance in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 124, 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.059
24
Eckstein, G., Shrestha, A., Sassenberg, A.-M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Marketing agility in volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) contexts: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00382-0
25
Fellnhofer, K. (2019). Entrepreneurially oriented employees and firm performance: mediating effects. Management Research Review, 42(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-01-2017-0009
26
Ferreira, J., Coelho, A., & Moutinho, L. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation, 92–93, 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.11.004
27
Fliess, S., & Volkers, M. (2019). Trapped in a service encounter. Journal of Service Management, 31(1), 79–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-01-2019-0013
28
Genc, E., Dayan, M., & Genc, O. F. (2019). The impact of SME internationalization on innovation: The mediating role of market and entrepreneurial orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 82, 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.01.008
29
Geyi, D. G., Yusuf, Y., Menhat, M. S., Abubakar, T., & Ogbuke, N. J. (2020). Agile capabilities as necessary conditions for maximising sustainable supply chain performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 222, 107501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.022
30
Ghantous, N., & Alnawas, I. (2020). The differential and synergistic effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on hotel ambidexterity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102072
31
Gupta, G., & Bose, I. (2019). Strategic learning for digital market pioneering: Examining the transformation of Wishberry’s crowdfunding model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 865–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.020
32
Gupta, V. K., Niranjan, S., & Markin, E. (2020). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the mediating role of generative and acquisitive learning through customer relationships. Review of Managerial Science, 14(5), 1123–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00327-6
33
Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2022). Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage Learning. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=PONXEAAAQBAJ
34
Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130
35
Hair Jr, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
36
Hunt, S. D., & Madhavaram, S. (2020). Adaptive marketing capabilities, dynamic capabilities, and renewal competences: The “outside vs. inside” and “static vs. dynamic” controversies in strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.07.004
37
Iheanachor, N., Umukoro, I. O., & David-West, O. (2021). The role of product development practices on new product performance: Evidence from Nigeria’s financial services providers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120470
38
Iqbal, M., Mawardi, M. K., Sanawiri, B., Alfisyahr, R., & Syarifah, I. (2023). Strategic orientation and its role in linking human capital with the performance of small and medium enterprises in Indonesia. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 25(3), 514–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-11-2021-0150
39
Joly, M. P., Teixeira, J. G., Patrício, L., & Sangiorgi, D. (2019). Leveraging service design as a multidisciplinary approach to service innovation. Journal of Service Management, 30(6), 681–715. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-07-2017-0178
40
Kapferer, J.-N. M., & Valette-Florence, P. (2018). The impact of increased brand penetration on luxury desirability: a dual effect. Journal of Brand Management, 25(5), 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0091-7
41
Katsikea, E., Theodosiou, M., & Makri, K. (2019). The interplay between market intelligence activities and sales strategy as drivers of performance in foreign markets. European Journal of Marketing, 53(10), 2080–2108. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2017-0402
42
43
Kottika, E., Özsomer, A., Rydén, P., Theodorakis, I. G., Kaminakis, K., Kottikas, K. G., & Stathakopoulos, V. (2020). We survived this! What managers could learn from SMEs who successfully navigated the Greek economic crisis. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.021
44
Ladhari, R., Souiden, N., & Dufour, B. (2017). The role of emotions in utilitarian service settings: The effects of emotional satisfaction on product perception and behavioral intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.09.005
45
Ledesma-Chaves, P., Arenas-Gaitán, J., & Garcia-Cruz, R. (2020). International expansion: mediation of dynamic capabilities. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 38(5), 637–652. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-05-2019-0269
46
Lee, S.-Y., Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2020). Emotion regulation in service encounters: are customer displays real? Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 30(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-12-2018-0285
47
Lim, S., & Kim, S. T. (2023). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and success of foodservice business: effects of religion. Service Business, 17(1), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-023-00521-3
48
Liu, C. L. (Eunice), Zhang-Zhang, Y., & Ghauri, P. N. (2020). The influence of internet marketing capabilities on international market performance. International Marketing Review, 37(3), 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-04-2018-0146
49
Liu, Z., Geng, R., Tse, Y. K. (Mike), & Han, S. (2023). Mapping the relationship between social media usage and organizational performance: A meta-analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 122253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122253
50
Luo, J. (Gemma), Wong, I. A., King, B., Liu, M. T., & Huang, G. (2019). Co-creation and co-destruction of service quality through customer-to-customer interactions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(3), 1309–1329. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2017-0792
51
Mainardes, E. W., Cisneiros, G. P. de O., Macedo, C. J. T., & Durans, A. de A. (2022). Marketing capabilities for small and medium enterprises that supply large companies. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-07-2020-0360
52
McGowan, P. (2021). Use of effectuation by established micro businesses: short-term gain, long-term pain? Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2020-0055
53
Medase, K., & Barasa, L. (2019). Absorptive capacity, marketing capabilities, and innovation commercialisation in Nigeria. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(5), 790–820. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2018-0194
54
Mohammad Shafiee, M. (2022). Competitive advantage via intellectual capital: a moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(5), 957–997. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-05-2020-0152
55
Monteiro, A. P., Soares, A. M., & Rua, O. L. (2019). Linking intangible resources and entrepreneurial orientation to export performance: The mediating effect of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.04.001
56
Moroni-Cutovoi, I. T. (2021). An examination of competitive strategy in buyer-supplier relationships for remanufacturing. Journal of Remanufacturing, 11(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13243-020-00097-5
57
Nicholls, R., & Gad Mohsen, M. (2019). Managing customer-to-customer interaction (CCI) – insights from the frontline. Journal of Services Marketing, 33(7), 798–814. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-11-2018-0329
58
Niu, Y., Deng, F., & Hao, A. W. (2020). Effect of entrepreneurial orientation, collectivistic orientation and swift Guanxi with suppliers on market performance: A study of e-commerce enterprises. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.020
59
Nuryakin, & Ardyan, E. (2018). SMEs’ marketing performance: the mediating role of market entry capability. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 20(2), 122–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-03-2016-0005
60
Paparoidamis, N. G., Tran, H. T. T., & Leonidou, C. N. (2019). Building Customer Loyalty in Intercultural Service Encounters: The Role of Service Employees’ Cultural Intelligence. Journal of International Marketing, 27(2), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X19837950
61
Park, C., & Kim, Y. (2003). A framework of dynamic CRM: linking marketing with information strategy. Business Process Management Journal, 9(5), 652–671. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150310496749
62
Pedada, K., Arunachalam, S., & Dass, M. (2020). A theoretical model of the formation and dissolution of emerging market international marketing alliances. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(5), 826–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00641-1
63
Peterson, R. A., & Crittenden, V. L. (2020). Exploring customer orientation as a marketing strategy of Mexican-American entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Research, 113, 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.059
64
Presutti, M., & Odorici, V. (2019). Linking entrepreneurial and market orientation to the SME’s performance growth: the moderating role of entrepreneurial experience and networks. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(3), 697–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0533-4
65
Pyper, K., Doherty, A. M., Gounaris, S., & Wilson, A. (2019). Investigating international strategic brand management and export performance outcomes in the B2B context. International Marketing Review, 37(1), 98–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-02-2019-0087
66
Rigtering, C., Niemand, T., Phan, V., & Gawke, J. (2024). Intrapreneurs, high performers, or hybrid stars? How individual entrepreneurial orientation affects employee performance. Journal of Business Research, 176, 114596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114596
67
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2024). SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS. https://www.smartpls.com
68
Robinson, S., Orsingher, C., Alkire, L., De Keyser, A., Giebelhausen, M., Papamichail, K. N., Shams, P., & Temerak, M. S. (2020). Frontline encounters of the AI kind: An evolved service encounter framework. Journal of Business Research, 116, 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.038
69
Roy, S. K., Balaji, M. S., Soutar, G., & Jiang, Y. (2020). The Antecedents and Consequences of Value Co-Creation Behaviors in a Hotel Setting: A Two-Country Study. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 61(3), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965519890572
70
Rožman, M., Tominc, P., & Štrukelj, T. (2023). Competitiveness Through Development of Strategic Talent Management and Agile Management Ecosystems. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(3), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-023-00344-1
71
Rubio-Andrés, M., Linuesa-Langreo, J., Gutiérrez-Broncano, S., & Sastre-Castillo, M. Á. (2024). How to improve market performance through competitive strategy and innovation in entrepreneurial SMEs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-024-00947-9
72
Rwehumbiza, D., & Marinov, M. A. (2020). Development of entrepreneurial orientation of export manufacturers from emerging economies. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(2), 667–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00580-x
73
Salah, O. H., & Ayyash, M. M. (2024). E-commerce adoption by SMEs and its effect on marketing performance: An extended of TOE framework with ai integration, innovation culture, and customer tech-savviness. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100183
74
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Becker, J. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUSMJ.2019.05.003
75
Sendawula, K., Kisubi, M. K., Najjinda, S., Nantale, H., & Kabbera, S. (2023). The efficacy of entrepreneurial networking and innovation in fostering the performance of small businesses in Uganda. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00358-0
76
Singh, S. H., Bhowmick, B., Eesley, D., & Sindhav, B. (2021). Grassroots innovation and entrepreneurial success: Is entrepreneurial orientation a missing link? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 119582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.02.002
77
Söderlund, M., & Mattsson, J. (2019). Thinking about service encounters boosts talking about them. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(4), 506–515. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-04-2018-2655
78
Sok, P., Snell, L., Lee, W. J. (Thomas), & Sok, K. M. (2017). Linking entrepreneurial orientation and small service firm performance through marketing resources and marketing capability. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(1), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-01-2016-0001
79
Valentini, T., Roederer, C., & Castéran, H. (2024). From redesign to revenue: Measuring the effects of servicescape remodeling on customer lifetime value. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 77, 103681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103681
80
Varadarajan, R. (2023). Resource advantage theory, resource based theory, and theory of multimarket competition: Does multimarket rivalry restrain firms from leveraging resource Advantages? Journal of Business Research, 160, 113713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113713
81
Verhulst, N., Slabbinck, H., & Vermeir, I. (2019). Boosting service performance by dark chocolate seduction. Journal of Services Marketing, 33(5), 576–588. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2019-0026
82
Wali, B., Khattak, A. J., & Karnowski, T. (2020). The relationship between driving volatility in time to collision and crash-injury severity in a naturalistic driving environment. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 28, 100136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2020.100136
83
Weerawardena, J., Mort, G. S., & Liesch, P. W. (2019). Capabilities development and deployment activities in born global B-to-B firms for early entry into international markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 78, 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.06.004
84
Widya-Hasuti, A., Mardani, A., Streimikiene, D., Sharifara, A., & Cavallaro, F. (2018). The Role of Process Innovation between Firm-Specific Capabilities and Sustainable Innovation in SMEs: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia. Sustainability, 10(7), 2244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072244
85
Wu, S., Luo, Y., Zhang, H., & Cheng, P. (2024). Entrepreneurial bricolage and entrepreneurial performance: The role of business model innovation and market orientation. Heliyon, 10(4), e26600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26600
86
Xu, Y., Shieh, C.-H., van Esch, P., & Ling, I.-L. (2020). AI Customer Service: Task Complexity, Problem-Solving Ability, and Usage Intention. Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(4), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.03.005
87
Yacob, S., Sulistiyo, U., Marzal, J., Siregar, A. P., & Mukminin, A. (2023). An Investigation of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Social Media Adoption and E-commerce on MSME Business Performance: An Empirical Study in Indonesia. Revista Galega de Economía, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.15304/rge.32.3.9001
88
Zahoor, N., Tarba, S., Arslan, A., Ahammad, M. F., Mostafiz, M. I., & Battisti, E. (2023). The impact of entrepreneurial leadership and international explorative-exploitative learning on the performance of international new ventures. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09926-0