1. Introduction
Fear of crime (FOC) is “an emotional response of dread or anxiety to crime or symbols that a person associates with crime” (). This emotion is connected to environmental conditions (; ) and socioeconomic profiles. This effect can also vary according to gender, age, and past experiences (; ). Additionally, neighborhood conditions are also important, with some authors highlighting that FOC is higher among the areas with higher crime rates (; ; ).
The links between vulnerability and FOC are strong (), some studies stating that it is positively associated with socio-demographic characteristics related to social marginality for women, the elderly, the poorly educated, and the unemployed (). In any case, the role of certain demographical characteristics is unclear. Although gender and age are two typically mentioned variables linked with higher levels of FOC, it seems that the influence of socio-structural characteristics of the environment and social disorder (; ) are relevant factors to bear in mind. In this sense, some studies have stated that if “controlling for perceptions of community disorder, perceptions of collective efficacy, direct victimization experience and indirect victimization experience”, gender and age are largely unrelated to FOC (). In contrast, other papers have found that gender is a good predictor of FOC (; ; ).
Past experience is a predictor of FOC (; ; ; ; ; ), but the vicarious experience provided by TV and social media must also be considered. Events such as kidnappings or child death covered extensively in the media, for example, might have an immediate negative impact, which may be long-lasting (). Social media can also alter the perception of FOC and the perception of safety (PS) (). On the same topic, the influence of gender is very weak. In a study performed on television viewers, there was not any evidence to support that crime-related media consumption affected women’s perceptions of crime risk more strongly than men’s ().
Some researchers have highlighted that social media does not show a real image of the situation, and that there is a strong bias towards violent and sexual crimes (). The association between television exposure and elevated perceptions of one’s own risk of victimization have been studied (), so identification plays an important role in FOC. Cultivation theory posits that television is an important storyteller and as such is a primary source of socialization in contemporary society (). In a recent study of the Finnish population, there was found to be a connection between criminal news consumption and the FOC (), other authors underlining that the more time is spent consuming social media, the more intensive are fear-generating social and psychological factors (). On the other hand, some academics have stated that the influence of the media is not particularly high. Fake news, current events programs, and reality TV shows are not a primary route through which FOC develops (). Nevertheless, some authors (), even though they consider that TV news programs play an important role in the perception of FOC or PS, highlight that “the variables with the greatest impact on fear are not related to the media, but include perceptions on the environmental problems, the respondent's gender, age and whether he or she has been the victim of a crime”.
Sexual violence is a prominent social problem (). In particular cases of sexual abuse and rape, perception of justice (PJ) is an issue that students have studied to a large degree (; ). Since perception is a subjective assessment, PJ is usually equated with the perception of the performance of the judicial system, particularly its decisions. The results of this research should be read with this in mind.
On this subject, there is a Finnish study that have assessed which punishments students considered should be applied, finding that the victim’s level of consciousness is an important factor. For example, in the case of perpetrators who drug their victims versus those whose victims willingly drink to become inebriated, students felt that the sanction should be lower in the latter case (). Some studies revealed that, in general, people believed that sex offenders should be punished more severely than other types of criminals (). Regarding assessments of the crimes, some authors () found that there are differences between genders in terms of assigning blame based on the socioeconomic status of the perpetrator (e.g., women blamed the rapist more often than the victim if the former belonged to a low socioeconomic status, whereas men tended to assign more blame to the victim and less blame to the perpetrator).
In subjective PJ, especially in socially relevant events that cause alarm, the role of social media (; ; ) and social mobilization (SM) can have a great influence on the personal valuation of the judicial system and about feelings of safety. , in a review of the literature about the concept of PJ, stated that socioeconomic factors are mentioned in 20 % of the studies. In any case, the risk of being sexually assaulted or sexually harassed seems to be more common in women and in social minorities ().
Certain cases can cause high social alarm and can create a great deal of SM with street protests, feminist groups playing a significantly important role, attracting attention across social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook. They can even create legislative changes, as pointed out by .
Gang rape is becoming a worrying trend in many societies and several cases are attracting attention around the world, one of which took place in Delhi (India) on December 16th 2012 (; ; ) and could be likened to one known as “la manada” (“the wolf pack”), which our paper is based on. There have been similar cases in Australia occurring in the early 2000s (; ), and in Japan (), and the felony has been specifically described in the context of military service in the USA (). These types of rapes are not singular cases, as we can find them in many other countries, frequently linked with factors such as groups of male children and teenage boys (), minorities and those living in vulnerable states (e.g. immigrants) ().
In July 2016, in the city of Pamplona, Spain, an 18-year-old woman was claimed to have been sexually abused by a group of five men from Seville during a local festival known as San Fermín. The sentence for sexual abuse, which was announced on April 26th, 2018, was contested by many, who considered that it should have been considered as rape. This nuance has considerable consequences in the Spanish Criminal Code, the penalties being more severe in the second case. The court’s decision caused a furor of media coverage in Spain and in the international sphere (; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ), consisting of a flurry of public protests throughout Spain, as well as an outcry on social media platforms (; ;; ). This sparked an open public, political and academic debate about how consent should be expressed in sexual relations ().
The aim of this research paper is to provide empirical evidence on the role on SM on the perception of FOC, as well as to try to understand how the socioeconomic level can influence the subjective PJ and the PS.
2. METHOD
We have performed a review of the literature and carried out empirical research. An ad hoc questionnaire was designed (see Appendix A ), which was divided into three sections: A) Sociodemographic profile, B) Subjective evaluation of safety and justice, and C) Subjective evaluation of the criminal code and fines. Sections B and C were designed to collect information that related to FOC, the PS () and the PJ. We were specifically interested in the effect of gender (; ; ), the socio-economic environment (; ; ; ; ; ) and the compliance of the criminal code () in the context of SM prompted by social media.
The data was gathered in Seville, where the perpetrators of the crime were from, meaning that this case had particular relevance. Only those over twenty years old were surveyed, the total population of this age group at that moment being 559,717 people (). N=605 people answered a questionnaire. The total confidence error at 95% was 3.98%. The data was collected in two periods: the first one (n1=454) was performed in May 2018, after the social alarm was raised following the court’s decision; with this sample, the confidence error at 95% was 4.20%; the second one (n2=151) was performed four months later, in September 2018, to find out the effect of SM on the PS and the PJ, when the social alarm had decreased; with this sample, the confidence error at 95% was 7.97%. Due to budgetary restrictions, we had to reduce the sample size of the second period, although the confidence error allowed us to obtain statistically valid conclusions. It must also be highlighted that the confidence error for the second period was higher. Ethics approval was not required for this type of research.
The number of participants per city district was proportionally assigned to have a representative sample of all socioeconomic profiles in each period. Participants were randomly selected. The questions that required valuations were recorded on a Likert scale between 1 (very low) and 5 (very high).
This body of work was based on the study of associations between pairs of variables by means of contingency tables, contrasts on the means using the t-test, and contrast on whether the different categories of given variables were equally likely to occur (using the Binomial test if there were only two possible categories, and the Chi-square test for more than two). Additionally, we performed linear regression tests to determine the significance of the association of variables. SPSS version 21 software was used for data analysis.
The test used to determine the statistical significance of the possible relationship between pairs of variables was the Chi-square test. The hypothesis to contrast was the absence of association between the two variables analyzed in each case. The significant levels considered were 1% and 5%. The lower the significant level of the contrast, the greater the evidence of the sample was in favor of that relationship, or in other words, the more significant the result was. To measure the degree of linkage we used Cramer’s V for nominal variables (whose values were between 0 and 1, the closer the value to 1, the higher the linkage). Additionally, for ordinal variables we used Kendall’s Tau B (whose values were between -1 and 1, the nearer the value to 1, the more positive the linkage, the nearer the value to -1, the more negative the linkage).
3. RESULTS
The general sample (N=605) consisted of 305 women (50.4%) and 300 men. 54.0% were between 31 and 60 years old and 73.9% of the sample had an educational level between medium (high school, 35.7%) and high (university degree, 38.2%). 52.4% were in employment and the rest were retired (19.7%), unemployed (18.0%) or students (9.9%). The income level was divided into multiples of €500 starting from less than €500/month up to more than €2,500/month. The two main groups of workers consisted of those earning less than €500/month (27.8%), and those who earned between €1,000/month and €1,500/month (25.8%).
The PS of the city was generally good, 78.5% considering the safety level to be between normal (47.1%) and high (31.4%). In any case, the city was considered as safe as other cities in the country (36.0%) or less (27.4%) by most of the interviewees. Only 28.1% of the sample had fallen victim to a crime in the last ten years. Among those who had been affected by one, in most cases (74.1%), they were burglaries or robberies.
Meanwhile, the confidence in the judiciary system (mainly understood as judiciary decisions) was low. 54.7% reported that their confidence in it was very low (26.1%) or low (28.6%).
3.1. The effect of the proximity in time to an event that has generated social alarm
In the second period (September 2018), when the social alarm had decreased, the PS of the city had increased ( =0.001; T=-0.121). There were no statistically significant differences for crime victims between the two waves. The subjective PS of the city in comparison with other cities had also increased in the second period ( =0.000; T=0.120). Additionally, the perception of the effectiveness of the police had increased ( =0.000; T=-0.243). In contrast the trust in the legal system had decreased after the event. The general confidence was low for both time periods, but in the second period, it was lower ( =0.018; T=-0.049).
By gender and age, confidence in the courts was not associated with either of these variables (gender and age) in the first period, but there was an association with age in the second period. Confidence in the justice system had significantly fallen in the second period ( =.001). In the case of the effectiveness of the police, opinions were significantly higher by age in the first period ( =0.000), but not by gender ( =0.316), and the same association was seen in the second period. It was significantly higher by age ( =0.043) but not by gender ( =0.962).
The PS was associated with gender according to when (closer to when the social alarm was raised or farther from it) the measure was taken. There was a negative link for females in the first period ( =0.006) but not in the second ( =0.122). In contrast, the opposite phenomenon was seen with age. There was not a significant connection in the first period ( =0.156) but there was a significant ( =0.049) decrease in PS by age in the second period.
Despite the above correlation with the confidence in the justice system, the harshness of the Criminal Code changed between the two waves. In the sample that completed the questionnaire nearest to when the social alarm was raised, the harshness of the Criminal Code was mainly considered as being very low (33.5%) or low (31.9%), and in the second wave it was considered as low (31.2%) or normal (33.1%). The difference between these two points in time was statistically significant at 99% ( =0.000; T=0.249). There were neither any significant associations by gender or age in the valuation of the Criminal Code in the general sample, nor at the time closest to the social alarm but there was a significant drop ( =0.001) by age when the social alarm decreased (period 2). There were no significant differences by gender in either of the periods (Table 1).
Note: *Significant at 99%; **Significant at 95%
The valuation of then police, in general, also improved as the social alarm eased. The perception of the effectiveness of the police had gone up in the second period. In the first period, the effectiveness was considered mainly normal or high (66.8%), the exact values being normal (24.7%) or high (42.1%). Meanwhile, in the second period, more interviewees considered its effectiveness to be normal (41.7%). In general, in said period police effectiveness was considered to be between normal and high (76.1%, high). These differences were statistically significant at 99% ( =0.000; T=-0.243) (see table 2). However, the effectiveness of the police was positively associated with age at the time closest to the social alarm ( =0.000), but negatively associated with age in the second period ( =0.043). There were no significant associations with gender in either of the two periods.
Note: *Significant at 95%; **Significant at 99%
Levels (1 to 5) 1.- Very low; 2.-Low; 3.- Normal – Equal (the same as in Seville); 4.- High; 5.- Very High
Regarding punishments for crimes (see table 3), those surveyed mainly agreed with permanent (reviewable) prison, but this opinion appeared to decrease as the social alarm decreased. In this case, the timing was relevant, with there being a positive association between gender ( =.016) and age ( =.006) at the moment closest to the SM (first period), but with a non-significant one at the second period for both of the variables.
As for the death penalty, there was general disagreement about it in all circumstances, but we must underline that the proportion of people who were against it grew as the social alarm fell. The consensus about the harshness of the criminal code improved as the social alarm decreased. In all cases, the mean differences were significant at 99%. The public’s main concerns (see table 3) appears to decrease in all cases with one exception, that of immigration. In all cases, the mean differences were significant at 99%.
Note: (*)Significant at 95%; (**)Significant at 99%
Levels (1 to 5) 1.- Very low; 2.-Low; 3.- Normal; 4.- High; 5.- Very high
3.2. The effect of socioeconomic factors on the valuation of judiciary decisions and safety: educational and income level
The PS of the city was high in general, but it tended to be higher when the educational level was higher too. Among those with a low educational level, the safety of the city was considered to be between normal and high (73.1%). Those with a high level of education considered the safety to be between normal and high (81.9%) in a higher proportion. These differences were statistically significant at 95% ( =0.002; T=0.134).
There were no differences between interviewees who were previous victims of crime and those who were not.
Trust in judiciary decisions was low, but was the higher the educational level, the better regarded they were; lower educational level holders gave the legal system ratings that were mainly low or normal (53.7%); those with higher degrees of education scored it between low and normal (59.3%). These differences were statistically significant ( =0.046; T=0.121).
The PS of the city versus other cities was lower at both extremes of educational level in comparison with those who had a medium academic level. The differences were significant at 95%.
Note: (*)Significant at 95%; (**)Significant at 99%
Levels (1 to 5) 1.- Very low; 2.-Low; 3.- Normal – Equal (the same as in Seville); 4.- High; 5.- Very High
In this case, there were no significant differences for confidence in the judiciary system (in general being mainly low or normal) or for the level of perception of the effectiveness of the police (in general being mainly normal or high). Regarding punishments, general consensus was in favor of permanent (reviewable) prison, and against the death penalty. There were no significant differences in these results among the different educational levels. Similarly, the subjective perception of the harshness of the criminal code did not have any significant differences among educational levels, which was between low and normal (see table 5).
There were significant differences (see table 5) for immigration concerns (significant at 99%) and for drugs and crime (significant at 95%). In the case of immigration, the significant differences were between the higher and lower levels of education in comparison to the average. The concern about drugs was higher among those who had lower academic qualifications. In the rest of the cases, for unemployment and terrorism, the concern was high but there were not any differences among the different educational levels.
Note: (*)Significant at 95%; (**)Significant at 99%
Levels (1 to 5) 1.- Very low; 2.-Low; 3.- Normal; 4.- High; 5.- Very high
The perception of safety in the city was generally high and the greater the income level, the better the opinion of it was ( =0.002; T=0.134). The valuation of the effectiveness of the police showed statistical differences among each level of the variable, which was higher, the higher the income level was. By dividing the sample into two large groups, the first being below-average and average income earners (€1,000/month) and the other, above-average earners (see table 6), those receiving lower incomes considered the police to have a higher level of effectiveness.
The other significant effect regarded the perception of safety in comparison with other cities. It was significantly higher among those with higher incomes (see table 6). On this point, it must be highlighted that there were no significant differences for the confidence in the judiciary system, where for all economic levels the rating given was very low or low. The same result was obtained when we studied this variable for the educational levels.
Note: (*)Significant at 95%
Levels (1 to 5) 1.- Very low; 2.-Low; 3.- Normal – equal (the same as in Seville); 4.- High; 5.- Very high
Regarding punishments, the only one for which we found significant effects among income levels was for permanent (reviewable) prison (see table 7). There was a general consensus for this measure, but the proportion of those who supported it was higher among greater-income earners. Again, there was general opposition to the death penalty without any differences among income levels and the perception of the harshness of the Criminal Code was low.
The concerns about terrorism, unemployment, immigration, and drugs as possible sources of crime were high in all cases without any significant differences among income levels (see table 7). The samples in the two periods were similar in terms of educational and socio-economic profiles.
Note: (*)Significant at 95%
Levels (1 to 5) 1.- Very low; 2.-Low; 3.- Normal; 4.- High; 5.- Very high
4. DISCUSSION
The inadequate response to gang rape cases according to social expectations of justice and governments cause enormous debates at both social and academic levels () every time incidents like these occur. Victims often struggle with long-term consequences, such as posttraumatic stress disorder and constant suicide attempts (; ). When cases like these happen, they can encourage changes in the law to be made, but they do not always lead to a decrease in violence towards women (). Instead, a change in mindset when it comes to gender roles and a cultural switch are needed ().
To consider the possible effects of social media, our study collected data at two different stages. In the first period, when posting activity was high, the influence of social media was also high, although it decreased in the second period. In our research, we saw that SMs as well as the messages and slogans published during the peak moments of the judicial sentence had a relevant effect on the population’s PS and FOC, but our data shows that these effects did not last for long, which is in line with other studies that have stated that social networks cause a temporal fluctuation of the correlation between the perception of crime and crime that actually occurred (; ). The perception of danger decreased within just four months of the pivotal moment whereas its effect on the PJ lasted for longer. Some authors have highlighted that, regarding the jeopardy of sexual harassment in big cities such as Karachi and London, the PJ and PS were related with the perception of legal protection ().
By age, the confidence in judiciary decisions and the PS was lower, even when the social alarm had decreased. Older people were more at risk of being crime victims. The judiciary system is in general low in its process, affecting older people more than young people, perhaps explaining why the former had a higher FOC.
In any case, the confidence in the justice system (basically understood as judiciary decisions) was, in general, low. It was lower during a break event such as a social case that caused social alarm but, in contrast with the PS, the PJ was not so resilient. After general mobilizations, the loss of confidence in justice persisted, which may have been related to what is called “the optimistic bias”, the belief that bad things happen to other people. It is assumed that those who have been victims of a sexual offense are more likely to fear being a victim again ().
Women have a lower PS, which is one of the factors that influences FOC. This perception is affected by SM. In contrast, we have not seen a significant effect by proximity in time with the SM among women with confidence in the justice system, the effectiveness of the police, and in the harshness of the Criminal Code.
5. CONCLUSIONS
As we have seen, most people have not been victims of any type of crime in the last ten years, which could explain why confidence in the police’s efficiency is high and increases when social alarm decreases. Even amongst those who have experienced a crime, in most of the cases it has not been sexual assault or rape. Additionally, the social alarm raised by the case of “la manada” did not have anything to do with the PS regarding policing. Despite that, public marches and further protests on social media caused an atmosphere of insecurity that did not reflect the actual findings. This feeling of insecurity was unrelated to past personal experiences but rather to the vicariousness of social media.
It is out of the scope of this body of research to study the characteristics of the messages disseminated by social media or the use of each social media platform in detail, but the effect of the high social alarm elevated by social networks is not out of the scope of this body of research. The solidarity phenomenon through Twitter (currently X) has been studied and some authors () have stated that “Twitter's role is to serve as a “loudspeaker” for the outrage of a population more impacted by a ruling considered unjust than by explicit support for the victim”. What is more, social networks can even lead to the “social myth around rape” being highlighted, as defined by , which are myths that serve to deny and justify male aggression against women. Obviously, supporting the cause via Twitter/X does not imply much of an effort when retweeting, although the degree of politicization can play an important role on social debate platforms like this one (; ) so the value of this social support cannot be denied. SMs have led to debates in the European Parliament (; ) and have forced the Spanish government to review and reform the sexual assault law, proposing one on sexual violence that introduces the concept of sexual consent in terms of “only yes means yes” (; ; )
The prejudice towards certain sociodemographic groups such as immigrants is curious in itself as, in the case of "la manada", immigration as a factor that increases insecurity were higher after the peak of the SMs, indicating that cultural prejudice does not need any evidence to rear its ugly head.
During the pivotal moments, protesters called for tougher sentences. One of the issues considered in our collected data that warrants particular reflection is the harshness of the criminal code in terms of to what level society would be willing to go. The death penalty was abolished in Spain in the 1978 Constitution (Art. 15), but was maintained as an exceptional punishment in the military code for war crimes before being completely abolished in 1995. Even though Spain has been targeted by terrorist groups for more than 40 years, in general the population has been opposed to this type of sentence. In our analysis, the data shows general disagreement with the death penalty during the height of the SMs and after that point as well. However, it should be pointed out that the number of those who were in favor during the peak of the protests, fell when the general mobilizations disappeared, albeit with a non-significant difference, which could be read as a warning sign; when negative events occur and pressure is felt, radical ideas can easily begin to appear.
Educational level should also be considered as a factor when the PS and the PJ are analyzed. Our findings were in the same line as previous studies, a low PS and PJ being associated with belonging to minority groups (; ; ). The more highly qualified had a greater PS and PJ but in spite of this, the PJ was low regardless of academic level. Similar results were obtained when income levels were analyzed; there were no differences for the PJ, which was low in general for all economic levels. In contrast, the PS was higher when the income level was higher too.
After reviewing the main results of the research, it is important to emphasize its limitations. Gang rape and gang sexual abuse are phenomena that warrant more attention from academics and policy makers. The issues in this paper are not about a singular case. As we have seen in the literature there have been similar cases in other countries and at different moments. However, our empirical results are related to a specific case. Further analysis is needed with larger samples and in more geographical areas, which would lead to a broader view of the topics of this research.
SM occurred all over Spain and with similarly high intensity. We could only gather data from one city, Seville, which was where the perpetrators were from. This could be a bias that needs to be given careful consideration when examining the results. It would have been useful to gather data from Pamplona, where the crime occurred, and from other cities, to compare them.
Regarding the concerns about immigrants, we consider that they should be analyzed due to society being more politically polarized than it used to be. Our study did not include any questions about ethnicity or political orientation. Additionally, it would be interesting to discover the effects of each social media outlet for each sociodemographic group. These goals are out of the scope of our research, nevertheless.
We have measured confidence in safety and the justice system. Safety is mainly understood as the personal feeling of non-vulnerability and justice is frequently understood as balanced decisions of the judiciary system, but these concepts are very complex, and they may have many other interpretations. There is a great deal of literature on these issues that are beyond the scope of this paper, but could be helpful to take into consideration. Additionally, confidence is a subjective perception, and it is clearly influenced by personal and social factors. To understand the effect of the special circumstances, we measured our variables around a peak moment and when the social alarm had decreased. However, these perceptions should be measured in a variety of points in time in order to gain a better understanding of which factors have the most influence and for how long these maintain said influence.
Our results and reflections may be helpful for policymakers so that they can consider how important the educational level and the socio-economic conditions are in contributing to the improvement of confidence in the justice system and in the security provided by the State.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: MRA, SMR, JAPJ, Data Curation: MRA, Formal Analysis: MRA, Funding Acquisition: SMR, Investigation: MRA, JAPJ, Methodology: MRA, JAPJ, Project Administration: MRA, Resources: MRA, SMR, JAPJ, Supervision: MRA, SMR, Validation: MRA, SMR, Visualization: MRA, Writing – Original Draft: MRA, SMR, Writing – Review & Editing: MRA, SMR All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
Project 21947/PI/22 funded by the Region of Murcia (Spain) through the Regional Program for the Promotion of Scientific and Technical Research of Excellence (Action Plan 2022) of the Seneca Foundation – Science and Technology Agency of the Region of Murcia.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript.
References
1
AitBihiOuali, L., & Graham, D. J. (2021). The impact of the MeToo scandal on women’s perceptions of security. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 147, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.02.018
2
Amigo, P. (2021). La ley “solo sí es sí” pondrá fin a la ‘impunidad’ de la industria proxeneta. El Confidencial. https://www.elconfidencial.com/espana/2021-07-06/solo-si-es-si-irene-montero-ley-libertad-sexual_3168216/
3
Anderson, R. E., Silver, K. E., Ciampaglia, A. M., Vitale, A. M., & Delahanty, D. L. (2021). The Frequency of Sexual Perpetration in College Men: A Systematic Review of Reported Prevalence Rates From 2000 to 2017. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(3), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019860619
4
Aurrekoetxea-Casaus, M. (2020). San fermines #la manada case: An exploratory analysis of social support for victims of sexual violence on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106299
5
Ayuntamiento de Sevilla. (2017). Explotación estadística de los datos del Padrón de Habitantes y del Callejero. https://www.sevilla.org/servicios/servicio-de-estadistica/datos-estadisticos/explotacion-estadistica-padron
6
Bachman, R., Randolph, A., & Brown, B. L. (2011). Predicting Perceptions of Fear at School and Going to and from School for African American and White Students: The Effects of School Security Measures. Youth & Society, 43(2), 705–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X10366674
7
Beatley, M. (2019, April 23). The shocking rape trial that galvanised Spain’s feminists – and the far right. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/23/wolf-pack-case-spain-feminism-far-right-vox
8
Belair-Gagnon, V., Mishra, S., & Agur, C. (2014). Reconstructing the Indian public sphere: Newswork and social media in the Delhi gang rape case. Journalism, 15(8), 1059–1075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913513430
9
Black, K. A., & Gold, D. J. (2008). Gender Differences and Socioeconomic Status Biases in Judgments About Blame in Date Rape Scenarios. Violence and Victims, 23(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.115
10
Blevins, J. L., Lee, J. J., McCabe, E. E., & Edgerton, E. (2019). Tweeting for social justice in #Ferguson: Affective discourse in Twitter hashtags. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819827030
11
Bolger, M. A., Lytle, D. J., & Bolger, P. C. (2021). What matters in citizen satisfaction with police: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 72, 101760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101760
12
Brunton‐Smith, I., & Sturgis, P. (2011). Do neighborhoods generate fear of crime? An empirical test using the british crime survey. Criminology, 49(2), 331–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00228.x
13
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217
14
Caliso, R. A. C. C., Francisco, J. P. S., & Garcia, E. M. (2020). Broad Insecurity and Perceived Victimization Risk. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 32(2), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0260107919829966
15
Callanan, V., & Rosenberger, J. S. (2015). Media, Gender, and Fear of Crime. Criminal Justice Review, 40(3), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016815573308
16
Chadee, D., Smith, S., & Ferguson, C. J. (2019). Murder she watched: Does watching news or fictional media cultivate fear of crime? Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000158
17
Chaparro, L. F., Pulido, C., Rudas, J., Victorino, J., Reyes, A. M., Estrada, C., Narvaez, L. A., & Gómez, F. (2021). Quantifying Perception of Security through Social Media and Its Relationship with Crime. IEEE Access, 9, 139201–139213. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3114675
18
Chapin, J. R., & Pierce, M. (2012). Optimistic Bias, Sexual Assault, and Fear. The Journal of General Psychology, 139(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2011.635724
19
Chon, D. S., & Wilson, M. (2016). Perceived Risk of Burglary and Fear of Crime. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(3), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14551257
20
Comas, A. (2018, December 5). Manifestaciones contra la sentencia del ‘caso La Manada’, en imágenes. El País. https://elpais.com/elpais/2018/12/05/album/1544030702_036455.html
21
Cops, D., & Pleysier, S. (2011). “Doing Gender” in Fear of Crime: The Impact of Gender Identity on Reported Levels of Fear of Crime in Adolescents and Young Adults. British Journal of Criminology, 51(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq065
22
Custers, K., Dorrance Hall, E., Bushnell Smith, S., & McNallie, J. (2017). The Indirect Association Between Television Exposure and Self-Protective Behavior as a Result of Worry About Crime: The Moderating Role of Gender. Mass Communication and Society, 20(5), 637–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1317353
23
Custers, K., & Van den Bulck, J. (2013). The Cultivation of Fear of Sexual Violence in Women. Communication Research, 40(1), 96–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212440444
24
Deka, D., Brown, C. T., & Sinclair, J. (2018). Exploration of the effect of violent crime on recreational and transportation walking by path and structural equation models. Health & Place, 52, 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.05.004
25
Díaz, J. (2020, June 26). Confirman la condena de tres años de cárcel a dos miembros de la Manada por grabar la violación de San Fermín. ABC. https://sevilla.abc.es/sevilla/sevi-confirman-condena-tres-anos-carcel-miembros-manada-grabar-violacion-san-fermin-202006251226_noticia.html
26
Durham, M. G. (2013). “Vicious Assault shakes Texas Town.” Journalism Studies, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.657907
27
Etgar, T., & Prager, K. G. (2009). Advantages of Group Therapy for Adolescent Participants in the Same Gang Rape. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18(3), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538710902881329
28
Fedina, L., Holmes, J. L., & Backes, B. L. (2018). Campus Sexual Assault: A Systematic Review of Prevalence Research From 2000 to 2015. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016631129
30
Ferretti, F., Pozza, A., & Coluccia, A. (2019). Urban safety: A re-reading of the sense of unsafety through individual and ecological dimensions. European Journal of Criminology, 16(2), 188–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370818770766
31
Flecha, R., Tomás, G., & Vidu, A. (2020). Contributions From Psychology to Effectively Use, and Achieving Sexual Consent. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00092
32
Fleming, C. M., Manning, M., & Ambrey, C. L. (2016). Crime, greenspace and life satisfaction: An evaluation of the New Zealand experience. Landscape and Urban Planning, 149, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.014
33
Follingstad, D. R., Li, C. R., Chahal, J. K., & Renzetti, C. M. (2021). Students’ Perceptions of Justice: Application of Sanctions, Guilt, and Responsibility in Campus Sexual Assault Cases. Journal of Family Violence, 36(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00129-5
34
Gangoli, G., Bates, L., & Hester, M. (2020). What does justice mean to black and minority ethnic (BME) victims/survivors of gender-based violence? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(15), 3119–3135. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1650010
35
36
Grewal, K. (2012). Australia, the Feminist Nation? Discourses of Gender, ‘Culture’ and Nation in the ‘K Brothers’ Gang Rapes. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33(5), 509–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2012.701608
37
Haans, A., & de Kort, Y. A. W. (2012). Light distribution in dynamic street lighting: Two experimental studies on its effects on perceived safety, prospect, concealment, and escape. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.006
38
Harlow, S. (2012). Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline. New Media & Society, 14(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410408
39
Hedh, A. (2018). Spain’s application of international standards on the definition of sexual violence in light of the recent “La Manada” case. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28131/ANNA_HEDH/all-activities/plenary-speeches/8
40
Hicks, S., & Brown, S. (2013). Perceptions of risk. International Review of Victimology, 19(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758013492753
41
Hollis, M. E., Downey, S., del Carmen, A., & Dobbs, R. R. (2017). The relationship between media portrayals and crime: perceptions of fear of crime among citizens. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 19(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-017-0015-6
42
Hoolihan, E. C., & Thomas, K. J. (2020). The relationships between bonding social capital, personal belief in a just world and well-being: an analysis of a diverse student sample. Social Psychology of Education, 23(6), 1609–1626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09596-6
43
Hoor-Ul-Ain, S. (2020). Public sexual harassment mayhem on public transport in megacities - Karachi and London: A comparative review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101420
44
Idoiaga Mondragon, N., Gil de Montes Echaide, L., Asla Alcibar, N., & Larrañaga Eguileor, M. (2020). “La Manada” in the digital sphere: coping with a sexual aggression case through Twitter. Feminist Media Studies, 20(7), 926–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1643387
45
Intravia, J., Wolff, K. T., Paez, R., & Gibbs, B. R. (2017). Investigating the relationship between social media consumption and fear of crime: A partial analysis of mostly young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.047
46
Jalain, C. I., Andreescu, V., & Higgins, G. E. (2020). Fear of crime in France: a partial test of Ferraro’s risk interpretation model. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 22(4), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-020-00101-x
47
Klein, L. B., & Martin, S. L. (2019). Sexual Harassment of College and University Students: A Systematic Review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 152483801988173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019881731
48
Kumar, R., & Thapa, D. (2015). Social media as a catalyst for civil society movements in India: A study in Dehradun city. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1299–1316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814523725
49
Larrondo, A., Morales-i-Gras, J., & Orbegozo-Terradillos, J. (2019). Feminist hashtag activism in Spain: measuring the degree of politicisation of online discourse on #YoSíTeCreo, #HermanaYoSíTeCreo, #Cuéntalo y #NoEstásSola. Communication & Society, 32(4), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.4.207-221
50
Lee, M., Jackson, J., & Ellis, J. R. (2020). Functional and dysfunctional fear of crime in inner Sydney: Findings from the quantitative component of a mixed-methods study. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 53(3), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865820911994
51
Lodhia, S. (2015). From “living corpse” to India’s daughter: Exploring the social, political and legal landscape of the 2012 Delhi gang rape. Women’s Studies International Forum, 50, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2015.03.007
52
Maestro, L. P., & Zamira, R. (2020, June 4). Spanish court hands four “wolf pack” members further prison terms over separate sexual assault. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/04/europe/spain-wolf-pack-prison-intl/index.html
53
Maruthaveeran, S., & van den Bosh, C. K. (2015). Fear of crime in urban parks – What the residents of Kuala Lumpur have to say? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(3), 702–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.05.012
54
Muñoz, J. (2019, August 8). La Manada cumplirá su condena en cárceles fuera de Sevilla. Diario de Sevilla. https://www.diariodesevilla.es/juzgado_de_guardia/actualidad/Manada-cumplira-condena-carceles-fuera-de-Sevilla_0_1380462159.html
55
Nalla, M. K., & Gurinskaya, A. (2020). Police legitimacy or risk-avoidance: what makes people feel safe? Journal of Crime and Justice, 45(1) 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2020.1852950
56
Näsi, M., Tanskanen, M., Kivivuori, J., Haara, P., & Reunanen, E. (2021). Crime News Consumption and Fear of Violence: The Role of Traditional Media, Social Media, and Alternative Information Sources. Crime & Delinquency, 67(4), 574–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720922539
57
Navarro, C., & Coromina, Ò. (2020). Discussion and mediation of social outrage on Twitter: The reaction to the judicial sentence of “La Manada.” Communication & Society, 33(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.1.93-106
59
Özascilar, M. (2013). Predicting fear of crime. International Review of Victimology, 19(3), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758013492754
60
Pantazis, C. (2000). “Fear of Crime”, Vulnerability and Poverty. British Journal of Criminology, 40(3), 414–436. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/40.3.414
61
Parliament, E. (2018). Preguntas parlamentarias - Asunto: Sentencia de la manada. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-8-2018-002589_ES.html
62
Podaná, Z., & Krulichová, E. (2018). The impact of parenting style on fear of crime among adolescent girls and boys. Journal of Youth Studies, 21(8), 1077–1094. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2018.1449945
63
Prieto Curiel, R., & Bishop, S. R. (2016). A metric of the difference between perception of security and victimisation rates. Crime Science, 5(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-016-0060-y
64
Prieto Curiel, R., Cresci, S., Muntean, C. I., & Bishop, S. R. (2020). Crime and its fear in social media. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0430-7
65
Putrik, P., van Amelsvoort, L., Mujakovic, S., Kunst, A. E., van Oers, H., Kant, Ij., Jansen, M. W., & De Vries, N. K. (2019). Assessing the role of criminality in neighbourhood safety feelings and self-reported health: results from a cross-sectional study in a Dutch municipality. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 920. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7197-z
66
Redacción/Agencias. (2021). El Gobierno aprueba hoy la ley “solo sí es sí” con una nueva definición del consentimiento. La Vanguardia. https://www.lavanguardia.com/vida/20210706/7580479/ley-solo-si-es-si-aprueba-hoy-definicion-consentimiento.html
67
Redacción, B. M. (2018, April 28). Caso “La manada”: más de 30.000 personas salen a protestar contra polémica sentencia por abuso sexual en España. BBC Mundo. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-43940999
68
Riggs, S., & Cook, C. L. (2015). The Shadow of Physical Harm? Examining the Unique and Gendered Relationship Between Fear of Murder Versus Fear of Sexual Assault on Fear of Violent Crime. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(14), 2383–2409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514553117
69
Roberts, N. J. (2019). Gender, sexual danger and the everyday management of risks: The social control of young females. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 3 (1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868018X15265563342670
70
Rodríguez, Á. (2020, July 3). The Wolfpack trial was a turning point in Spain, it could be another case but it was this one. History demanded it. Medium. https://medium.com/@SAHR_org/the-wolfpack-trial-was-a-turning-point-in-spain-it-could-be-another-case-but-it-was-this-one-75d8d188e121
71
Rogers, D. L., & Ferguson, C. J. (2011). Punishment and Rehabilitation Attitudes toward Sex Offenders Versus Nonsexual Offenders. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20(4), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2011.570287
72
73
Roy, A. (2014). Critical Events, Incremental Memories and Gendered Violence. Australian Feminist Studies, 29(81), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2014.959161
74
Sadler, A. G., Booth, B. M., & Doebbeling, B. N. (2005). Gang and multiple rapes during military service: health consequences and health care. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association (1972), 60 (1), 33–41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16845766
75
Scherman Teitelboim, A., & Etchegaray Thielemann, N. (2013). News and fear of crime in Chile | Consumo de noticias y temor al delito en Chile. Estudios Sobre El Mensaje Periodistico, 19(1), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev-ESMP.2013.v19.n1.42539
76
Shandilya, K. (2015). Nirbhaya’s Body: The Politics of Protest in the Aftermath of the 2012 Delhi Gang Rape. Gender & History, 27 (2), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.12134
77
Sharma, R., & Bazilli, S. (2014). Violence Against Women: What’s Law Got to Do With It? A Reflection on Gang Rape in India. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 3(3), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v3i3.155
78
Silva, M. R., & Caetano, A. (2016). Organizational Justice Across Cultures: A Systematic Review of Four Decades of Research and Some Directions for the Future. In Social Justice Research, 29(3), 257–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-016-0263-0
79
Sironi, E., & Bonazzi, L. M. (2016). Direct Victimization Experiences and Fear of Crime: A Gender Perspective. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 22(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2016-0008
80
Snedker, K. A. (2012). Explaining the Gender Gap in Fear of Crime. Feminist Criminology, 7(2), 75–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085111424405
81
Snedker, K. A. (2015). Neighborhood Conditions and Fear of Crime. Crime & Delinquency, 61(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128710389587
82
Sreetheran, M., & van den Bosch, C. C. K. (2014). A socio-ecological exploration of fear of crime in urban green spaces – A systematic review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.11.006
83
Thomas, K. J. (2018). Justice Perceptions and Demographics of Privilege Among Brazilian Adolescents. Psychological Reports, 121(6), 1086–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117745886
84
Thomas, K. J., & Mucherah, W. M. (2016). How fair is my world? Development of just world beliefs among Kenyan students. Journal of Adolescence, 49, 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.03.011
85
Ullman, S. E. (2007). Comparing Gang and Individual Rapes in a Community Sample of Urban Women. Violence and Victims, 22(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1891/vv-v22i1a003
86
Vieno, A., Roccato, M., & Russo, S. (2013). Is Fear of Crime Mainly Social and Economic Insecurity in Disguise? A Multilevel Multinational Analysis. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(6), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2150
87
Warner, K. (2004). Gang Rape in Sydney: Crime, the Media, Politics, Race and Sentencing. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 37(3), 344–361. https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.37.3.344
88
Weldon, S. L., & Htun, M. (2013). Feminist mobilisation and progressive policy change: why governments take action to combat violence against women. Gender & Development, 21(2), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2013.802158
89
Wijer-Hasegawa, Y. S. (2003). Ex-students of elite universities admit to gang rapes. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2003/09/18/national/ex-students-of-elite-universities-admit-to-gang-rapes/
90
Wikipedia. (n.d.). La Manada rape case. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Manada_rape_case
91
Worthington, N. (2013). “Culture Clash” in Phoenix. Journalism Studies, 14(6), 790–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.744553
92
Yuning Wu, Sun, I. Y., & Zongxian Wu. (2011). Support for the death penalty: Chinese and American college students compared. Punishment & Society, 13(3), 354–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474511404337
93
Zatkin, J., Sitney, M., & Kaufman, K. (2021). The Relationship Between Policy, Media, and Perceptions of Sexual Offenders Between 2007 and 2017: A Review of the Literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1524838020985568. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020985568
Appendix
Appendix A - QUESTIONAIRE
PERSONAL DATA:
Questionnaire:
Section 1: PERCEPTION OF SECURITY
- 1.
Rate the security level of Seville from 1 to 5. 1 being the least secure and 5 being the most secure.
- 2.
In the last 10 years, have you ever been victim of any crime in Seville?
- 3.
What type of crime? (Only if the person answered yes to the previous question)
- 4.
Rate in general terms the level of effectiveness of the police in our country.
1 being the least effective and 5 being the most effective.
- 5.
Rate in general terms the level of confidence in the judiciary from 1 to 5.
1 being the least reliable and 5 being the most reliable.
- 6.
In comparison with other cities you know, do you consider that there is a lot or little crime in Seville?
Rate from 1 to 5, with 1 being very little in comparison and 5 being a lot in comparison.
- 7.
Of the areas listed in the personal data section, which do you consider to be the safest neighbourhood in Seville? Specify (Remember, they are numbered from 1 to 6 at the beginning).
SECTION 2: PENALTIES AND CRIMINALITY
- 1.
Are you in favour of revisable permanent imprisonment?
- 2.
Are you a supporter of the death penalty?
- 3.
Do you think that the Spanish Penal Code is harsh? Rate the degree from 1 to 5. 1 being the least harsh and 5 the harshest.
- 4.
Of the following factors, how much insecurity do you feel from 1 to 5? 1 being very little, and 5 being the highest.