Three-dimensional model of the institutional matrix as a methodological tool for designing institutional changes
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
- Dmytro Ivanovych Dzvinchuk+−
- Victor Pavlovych Petrenko+−
- Mariana Stepanivna Orliv+−
- Oleksandr Volodymyrovych Molodtsov+−
Abstract
The article offers a three-dimensional model of the institutional matrix that can be used as a methodological tool for designing institutional changes in transitional societies to develop their socio-economic systems. The empirical basis of the analysis is the results of the GLOBE research program that has defined value and practice scores of the main cultural dimensions in 62 countries which affect the formation and development of institutions. In contrast to the concept of alternative dominant “Eastern” (redistributive) and “Western” (market) matrices, as it is currently known, it is offered to interpret basic economic, ideological and political institutions of society in the form of alternative vectors. They create a spatial mega-matrix which consists of two dominant and six complementary matrices. Complementary matrices which are presented in the article are interesting for determining variants of the development of existing socio-economic systems, which could not be described using the elements of traditional matrices. It is demonstrated that real institutional matrices of modern mixed socio-economic systems are formed in the mega-matrix space with the participation of all its components. The possibilities and conditions for using the offered model in implementing institutional changes and in the development of socio-economic systems are revealed.
Keywords:
Cited by
Article Details
References
Bartlett, C. A. & Ghoshal, S. (1990). Matrix management: Not a structure, a frame of mind. Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 138-145. Retrived from https://hbr.org/1990/07/matrix-management-not-a-structure-aframe-of-mind
Bednar, J. (2018). Modeling the institutional matrix: Norms, culture, and robust design. In C. Menard & M. M. Shirley (Eds.), A research agenda for new institutional economics (pp. 162-170). Cheltenham, England: Elgar.
Berland, N. & Dreveton, B. (2006). Management control system in public administration: Beyond rational myths. Accounting Reform in the Public Sector: Mimicry, fad or Necessity, Réseau Cigar (pp. 21-37). Retrived from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00340432/document
Bessonova, O. (2012). Institutional matrix for modernization of Russia. Economic Issues, 8, 122-144 [in Russian].
Boiko-Boichuk, L. (2008). Matrix method: Peculiarities of application in political studies. Political Management, 1, 165-176 [in Ukrainian].
Bolotina, Ye. (2016). Institutional matrices of the society and the transformational economy of Ukraine. Business Inform, 10, 14-21 [in Ukrainian].
Chechetova-Terashvili, T. (2007). Classification of matrix methods used for strategic management of the enterprise. Quality of the Economic Development: Global and Local Aspects [in Ukrainian].
Chervyakova, O. (2017). The new public administration paradigm directions. Public Manаgement, 1, 198-203. Retrived from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/pubm_2017_1_21
Coase, R. H. (1992). The institutional structure of production. American Economic Review, 82(4), 713-719.
Degtiarov, A. & Degtiarova, S. (2007). Comparative modeling transformation of institutional matrices of socio-economic systems. Bulletin of OSU, 1, 58-72 [in Russian].
Delibasic, M. (2016). Hypothetical matrix for institutional modeling of the basis for economic development in the countries of Southeast Europe. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 12(2), 147-159. Retrived from http://www.mnje.com/sites/mnje.com/files/10_-_delibasic_0.pdf
Diermeier, D. & Krehbiel, K. (2001). Institutionalism as a methodology. Research Paper no. 1699. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Graduate School of Business. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629803015002645
Eggertsson, T. (1999). State reforms and the theory of institutional policy. Revista de Economia Politica, 19(2), 49-63. Retrived from http://www.rep.org.br/PDF/74-4.PDF
Filippova, I. (2011). Institutional matrix: Refusal of economic determinism. MPRA Paper, No. 47532. Retrived from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/47532/
Frolenko, R. & Zhukevych, S. (2012). Using matrix methods in strategic analysis of diversified companies. Galician Economic Bulletin, 6(39), 124-132 [in Ukrainian].
GLOBE. (2014). The GLOBE 2020 studies. GLOBE Project. Retrived from https://globe.bus.sfu.ca/
Hall, P. A. & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, XLIV, 936-957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
Ivanova, M. & Yashkina, N. (2014). Use of the complex of matrix methods for strategic analysis of productive enterprises activity. Economy and the State, 6, 8-90 [in Ukrainian].
Kirdina, S. (2014). Institutional matrices and the development of Russia: An introduction to X-Y theory. St. Petersburg, Russia: Nestor-Istoriya.
Kutsenko, O. (2010). To the study of patterns of post-socialist transformations in Eastern Europe. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Sociology, 1-2, 10-17 [in Russian].
Lakhyzha, M. (2012). Civilizational aspects of the post-communist transformation. Derzhavne Budivnytstvo, 1. Retrived from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/DeBu_2012_1_3 [in Ukrainian].
Lebediev, D. (2015). Institutional transformation of the socio-economic systems: Theory, methodology, analysis, practice of application in foreign trade of Russia. Moskow, Russia: Prospect [in Russian].
Lowndes, V. & Roberts, M. (2013). Why institutions matter: The new institutionalism in political science. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Miller, G. J. & Whicker, M. L. (1999). Handbook of research methods in public administration. New York, NY: Dekker.
Molodtsov, O. (2016). Methodological aspects of the institutional matrix theory in the context of dynamics of institutional changes. Theory and practice of public administration and local self-government, 2. Retrived from http://el-zbirn-du.at.ua/2016_2/8.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Mykhnenko, A., Makarenko, E. & Makarenko, N. (2011). Institutionalization of the social development. Kyiv, Ukraine: NAPA [in Ukrainian].
North, D. C. (1994). Institutional change: A framework of analysis. Economic History, #9412001. Retrived from https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/eh/papers/9412/9412001.pdf
Nowakowski, K. (2013). The institutional matrix theory as the basis of explanation of real estate bubble. Managerial Economics, 14, 113-135. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/manage.2013.14.113
Obolenskyi, O (2010). Institution of economic system of the society as objects of public administration. Scientific Bulletin of the Academy of Municipal Management: Economics, 8, 24-41 [in Ukrainian].
Panasiuk, R., Petrenko, V., Popova, Kh. & Yasinska, Y. (2018). Reengineering the human resources mentality as an integral part of the process of successful changes management in socio-economic systems. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy, 5(17), 60-68 [in Ukrainian].
Parsons, T. (1985). On institutions and social evolution. Chicago, IL/London, England: The University of Chicago Press.
Pasenko, V. (2013). Using matrix methods of portfolio analysis for efficiency evaluation of integration strategies of TNC. Financial Space, 2(10), 37-43 [in Ukrainian].
Petrenko, V. (2019). The role and tasks of economic science in transformation of institutional matrix of modern ukrainian society. Theoretical and methodological transformations of economic science in the XXI century: Prospects for a new paradigm (pp. 90-92). Kyiv, Ukraine: KNUTE [in Ukrainian].
Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. New York, NY: Farrar & Rinehart.
Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Predborska, I. (2013). Matrix effect in social philosophy researches. Philosophy of Education, 2(13), 52-57 [in Ukrainian].
Reimer, M. (2013). Planning cultures in transition: Sustainability management and institutional change in spatial planning. Sustainability, 5(11), 4653-4673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su5114653
Romanenko, Yu. (2005). Matrices of meaning production in social systems of the western and eastern countries: Comparative analysis. Multiuniversum. Philosophical Almanac, 49. Retrived from http://www.filosof.com.ua/Jornel/M_49/Romanenko.htm
Shulha, M. (2018). Failure of the social matrix. Kyiv, Ukraine: Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Schmidt, V. (2014). Institutionalism. In Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Retrived from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313505827_Institutionalism
Sil, R. & Katzenstein, P. (2010). Analytical eclecticism in the study of world politics. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 411-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001179
Tambovtsev, V. (1999). Institutional changes in Russian economy. Social Sciences and Modernity, 4, 44-53 [in Russian].
Trach, A. (2016). Variability of democratic transformation vectors for the political systems of post-soviet countries. (Doctor’s thesis). Retrived from http://dspace.pdpu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/370 [in Ukrainian].
Yelahin, V. (2014). Institutional transformation as the basis for effective development of the main resource areas in the state. Bulletin of the National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine, 2(1), 98-106 [in Ukrainian].
Veblen, T. (1918). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institution. New York, NY: Huebsch. Retrived from https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/veblen-the-theory-of-the-leisure-class-an-economic-studyof-institutions
Williamson, O., Burnett, M. F. & Bartol K. M. (2009). The interactive effect of collectivism and organizational rewards on affective organizational commitment. Cross Cultural Management, 16(1), 28-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600910930022