Main Article Content

Björn Asheim
University of Stavanger
Markus Grillitsch
Lund University – CIRCLE
Michaela Trippl
University of Vienna
Vol 28 No 2 (2019): Studies on regional innovation policies in the last two decades: from regional systems of innovation to intelligent specialization strategies, Articles, pages 4-22
Submitted: 22-07-2019 Accepted: 22-07-2019 Published: 12-09-2019
Copyright How to Cite


Since its development in the 1990s, the Regional Innovation Systems (RIS) approach has attracted considerable attention from economic geographers, innovation scholars and policy makers. The RIS approach is well-known in scientific discourse about the uneven geography of innovation and the factors that shape the knowledge generation and innovation capacities of regions. The aim of this paper is to reflect on the emergence of the RIS approach, the current debate as well as future challenges. This paper is structured  around four over arching research questions: What are the origins and theoretical foundations of this approach? What has the RIS approach contributed to innovation studies and economic geography? What are the implications for innovation policy? And what are the recent lines of research and key research challenges in the future? We argue that the contributions of the RIS approach have been substantial. Nevertheless, the approach has often been applied in a rather static way, more as a heuristic than a coherent theory. The key challenges for current and future research, therefore, are to move towards a more theory-based, dynamic perspective on RIS, dealing with new path development  and the transformation of RIS.

Cited by

Article Details


Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I., e McHale, J. (2006). Gone but not forgotten: Knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(5), 571-591. DOI:

Alkemade, F., Hekkert, M. P., e Negro, S. O. (2011). Transition policy and innovation policy: Friends or foes? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 125-129. DOI:

Amin, A., e Cohendet, P. (2005). Geographies of knowledge formation in firms. Industry and Innovation, 12(4), 465-486. DOI:

Asheim, B., e Vang, J. (2006). Regional innovation systems in Asian countries: A new way of exploiting the benefits of transnational corporations. Innovation, 8(1-2), 27-44. DOI:

Asheim, B. T. (1995). Regionale innovasjonssystem - en sosialt og territorielt forankret teknologipolitikk. Nordisk Samhällsgeografisk Tidskrift, 20, 17-34.

Asheim, B. T. (1996). Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: A condition for prosperity. European Planning Studies, 4(4), 379-400. DOI:

Asheim, B. T. (2000). Industrial districts: The contributions of Marshall and beyond. En G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman e M. S. Gertler (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic geography (pp. 413-431). Oxford, England / New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Asheim, B. T. (2007). Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20(3), 223-241. DOI:

Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., e Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893-904. DOI:

Asheim, B. T., e Coenen, L. (2006). Contextualising regional innovation systems in a globalising learning economy: On knowledge bases and institutional frameworks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 163-173. DOI:

Asheim, B. T., Coenen, L., e Moodysson, J. (2015). Methods and applications of regional innovation systems analysis. En C. Karlsson, M. Andersson e . Norman (Eds.), Handbook of research methods and applications in economic geography (pp. 272-290).

Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar. DOI: Asheim, B. T., e Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. En J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery e R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291-317). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Recuperado de

Asheim, B. T., e Isaksen, A. (1997). Location, agglomeration and innovation: Towards regional innovation systems in Norway? European Planning Studies, 5(3), 299-330. DOI:

Asheim, B. T., e Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local 'sticky' and global 'ubiquitous' knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77-86. DOI:

Asheim, B. T., Moodysson, J., e Tödtling, F. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Towards state-of-the-art regional innovation system policies in Europe? European Planning Studies, 19(7), 1133-1139. DOI:

Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., e Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875-891. DOI:

Aslesen, H. W., e Freel, M. (2012). Industrial knowledge bases as drivers of open innovation? Industry and Innovation, 19(7), 563-584. DOI:

Autio, E. (1998). Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European Planning Studies, 6(2), 131-140. DOI:

Baptista, R., e Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27(5), 525-540. DOI:

Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., e Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31-56. DOI:

Bianchi, P., e Giordani, M. G. (1993). Innovation policy at the local and national levels: The case of Emilia-Romagna. European Planning Studies, 1(1), 25-41. DOI:

Blažek, J., e Žižalová, P. (2010). The biotechnology industry in the Prague metropolitan region: A cluster within a fragmented innovation system? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(5), 887-904. DOI:

Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-75. DOI:

Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733-751. DOI:

Boschma, R., e Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85(3), 289-311. DOI:

Breschi, S., e Lissoni, F. (2009). Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(4), 439-468. DOI:

Brusco, S. (1982). The Emilian model: Productive decentralisation and social integration. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6(2), 167-184. DOI:

Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22(0), 345-423. DOI:

Camagni, R. (1995). The concept of innovative milieu and its relevance for public policies in european lagging regions. Papers in Regional Science, 74(4), 317-340. DOI:

Capello, R. (1999). SME Clustering and factor productivity: A milieu production function model. European Planning Studies, 7(6), 719-735. DOI:

Carlsson, B., e Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1(2), 93-118. DOI:

Chaminade, C. (2011). Are knowledge bases enough? A comparative study of the geography of knowledge sources in China (Great Beijing) and India (Pune). European Planning Studies, 19(7), 1357-1373. DOI:

Chaminade, C., e Vang, J. (2008). Globalisation of knowledge production and regional innovation policy: Supporting specialized hubs in the Bangalore software industry. Research Policy, 37(10), 1684-1696. DOI:

Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365-382. DOI:

Cooke, P. (1998). Introduction. Origins of the concept. En H. J. Braczyk, P. Cooke e M. Heidenreich (Eds.), Regional innovation systems: The role of governances in a globalized world (pp. 2-25). London, England: UCL Press. Recuperado de

Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945-974. DOI:

Cooke, P. (2002). Regional innovation systems: General findings and some new evidence from biotechnology clusters. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 133-145. DOI:

Cooke, P. (2004). Integrating global knowledge flows for generative growth in Scotland: Life sciences as a knowledge economy exemplar. En J. Potter (Ed.): Global knowledge flows and economic development (pp. 7396). Paris, France. DOI:

Cooke, P., De Laurentis, C., Tödtling, F., e Trippl, M. (2007). Regional knowledge economies: Markets, clusters and innovation. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar. DOI:

Cooke, P., e Morgan, K. (1994). The regional innovation system in Baden-Wurttemberg. International Journal of Technology Management, 9(3-1), 394-429. DOI:

Crevoisier, O. (2004). The innovative milieus approach: Toward a territorialized understanding of the economy? Economic Geography, 80(4), 367-379. DOI:

Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in Society, 24(3), 243-263. DOI:

Ebner, A. (2015). Editorial: Exploring regional varieties of capitalism. Regional Studies, 50(1), 3-6. DOI:

Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions, and organizations. London, England: Printer/Castell Academic.

Fitjar, R. D., e Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2011). When local interaction does not suffice: Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(6), 1248-1267. DOI:

Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘national system of innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24. Recuperado de

Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., e Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685-697. DOI:

Fritsch, M. (2003). Does R&D-cooperation behavior differ between regions? Industry and Innovation, 10(1), 25-39. DOI:

Gertler, M. S. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 75-99. DOI:

Gertler, M. S. (2004): Manufacturing culture: The institutional geography of industrial practice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Granovetter, M. (1973). The streangth of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 33-50. Recuperado de

Grillitsch, M., e Nilsson, M. (2015). Innovation in peripheral regions: Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers? The Annals of Regional Science, 54(1), 299-321. DOI:

Grillitsch, M., Tödtling, F., e Höglinger, C. (2013). Variety in knowledge sourcing, geography and innovation: Evidence from the ICT sector in Austria. Papers in Regional Science, 95(1), 25-43. DOI:

Grillitsch, M., e Trippl, M. (2014). Combining knowledge from different sources, channels and geographical scales. European Planning Studies, 22(11), 2305-2325. DOI:

Hassink, R. (2010). Locked in decline? On the role of regional lock-ins in old industrial areas. En R. Boschma e R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 450-468). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar. DOI:

Hassink, R., e Shin, D.H. (2005). The restructuring of old industrial areas in Europe and Asia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 37(4), 571-580. Recuperado de

Herstad, S. J., Aslesen, H. W., e Ebersberger, B. (2014). On industrial knowledge bases, commercial opportunities and global innovation network linkages. Research Policy, 43(3), 495-504. DOI:

Howells, J. (1999). Regional systems of innovation? En D. Archibugi, J. Howells e J. Michie (Eds.), Innovation policy in a global economy (pp. 67-92). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI:

Isaksen, A. (2014). Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography, 15(3), 585-600. DOI:

Isaksen, A. (2001). Building regional innovation systems: Is endogenous industrial development possible in the global economy? Canadian Jounal of Regional Science, 14(1), 101-120. Recuperado de

Isaksen, A., e Nilsson, M. (2013). Combined innovation policy: Linking scientific and practical knowledge in innovation systems. European Planning Studies, 21(12), 1919-1936. DOI:

Isaksen, A., e Trippl, M. (2014): Regional industrial path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. Papers in Innovation Studies, 2014/17. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, CIRCLE. DOI:

Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., e Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36(5), 680-693.

Knoben, J., e Oerlemans, L.A.G. (2006). Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 71-89. DOI:

Lundvall, B. Å. (1992): National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London, England: Pinter.

Maillat, D. (1998). Interactions between urban systems and localized productive systems: An approach to endogenous regional developement in terms of innovative milieu. European Planning Studies, 6(2), 117-130. DOI:

Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247-264. DOI:

Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems: How and why innovation differs across sectors. En J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery e R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 380-406). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. DOI:

Malmberg, A., e Maskell, P. (1999). The competitiveness of firms and regions: 'Ubiquitification' and the importance of localized learning. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(1), 9-25. DOI:

Manniche, J. (2012). Combinatorial knowledge dynamics: On the usefulness of the differentiated knowledge bases model. European Planning Studies, 20(11), 1823-1841. DOI:

Markard, J., e Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37(4), 596-615. DOI:

Marshall, A. (1920): Principles of economics: An introductory volume. London, England: Macmillan. Martin, R. (2012). Measuring knowledge bases in Swedish regions. European Planning Studies, 20(9), 1569-1582. DOI:

Martin, R. (2013). Differentiated knowledge bases and the nature of innovation networks. European Planning Studies, 21(9), 1418-1436. DOI:

Martin, R., e Moodysson, J. (2013). Comparing knowledge bases: On the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 170-187. DOI:

Martin, R., Moodysson, J., e Zukauskaite, E. (2011). Regional innovation policy beyond ‘best practice’: Lessons from Sweden. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(4), 550-568. DOI:

Martin, R., e Trippl, M. (2014). System failures, knowledge bases and regional innovation policies. disP. The Planning Review, 50(1), 24-32. DOI:

Maskell, P. (2001). Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 921-943. DOI:

Moodysson, J., Coenen, L., e Asheim, B.T. (2008). Explaining spatial patterns of innovation: analytical and synthetic modes of knowledge creation in the Medicon Valley life- science cluster. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(5), 1040-1056. DOI:

Moulaert, F., e Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: a critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289-302. DOI:

Mudambi, R., e Santangelo, G.D. (2015). From shallow resource pools to emerging clusters: The role of multinational enterprise subsidiaries in peripheral areas. Regional Studies, 50(12), 1965-1979. DOI:

Neffke, F., e Henning, M. (2013). Skill relatedness and firm diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 297-316. DOI:

Nelson, R. R. (1993): National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Piore, M. J., e Sabel, C.F. (1984): The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Plum, O., e Hassink, R. (2011). Comparing knowledge networking in different knowledge bases in Germany. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2), 355-371. DOI:

Plum, O., e Hassink, R. (2013). Analysing the knowledge base configuration that drives southwest Saxony’s automotive firms. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 206-226. DOI:

Polanyi, M. (1958): Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77-90. Recuperado de

Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15-35. DOI:

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., e Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145. DOI:

Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78. DOI:

Pyke, F., Becattini, G., e Sengenberger, W. (1990): Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy. Geneva, Switzerland: International Institute for Labour Studies. DOI:

Radosevic, S. (2002). Regional innovation systems in Central and Eastern Europe: Determinants, organizers and alignments. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 87-96. DOI:

Saxenian, A. (1994): Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Storper, M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2(3), 191-221. DOI:

Strambach, S., e Klement, B. (2012). Cumulative and combinatorial micro-dynamics of knowledge: The Role of space and place in knowledge integration. European Planning Studies, 20(11), 1843-1866. DOI:

Strambach, S., e Klement, B. (2013). Exploring plasticity in the development path of the automotive industry in Baden-Wurttemberg: The role of combinatorial knowledge dynamics. Zeitschrift Fur Wirtschaftsgeographie, 57(1-2), 67-82. DOI:

Swann, P., e Prevezer, M. (1996). A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology. Research Policy, 25(7), 1139-1157. DOI:

Tödtling, F., Asheim, B. T., e Boschma, R. (2013). Knowledge sourcing, innovation and constructing advantage in regions of Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 161-169. DOI:

Tödtling, F., e Grillitsch, M. (2015). Does combinatorial knowledge lead to a better innovation performance of firms?. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1741-1758.

Tödtling, F., Grillitsch, M., e Höglinger, C. (2012). Knowledge sourcing and innovation in Austrian ICT CompaniesHow does geography matter? Industry and Innovation, 19(4), 327-348. DOI:

Tödtling, F., Lehner, P., e Trippl, M. (2006). Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge links. European Planning Studies, 14(8), 1035-1058. DOI:

Tödtling, F., Skokan, K., Höglinger, C., Rumpel, P., e Grillitsch, M. (2013). Innovation and knowledge sourcing of modern sectors in old industrial regions: Comparing software firms in Moravia-Silesia and Upper Austria. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 188-205. DOI:

Tödtling, F., e Trippl, M. (2004). Like Phoenix from the Ashes? The renewal of clusters in old industrial areas. Urban Studies, 41(5-6), 1175-1195. DOI:

Tödtling, F., e Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203-1219. DOI:

Tödtling, F., e Trippl, M. (2013). Transformation of regional innovation systems: From old legacies to new development paths. En P. Cooke (Ed.), Reframing regional development (pp. 297-317). London, England: Routledge.

Trippl, M., Asheim, B. T., e Miorner, J. (2015): Identification of regions with less developed research and innovation systems. Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/1. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, CIRCLE. Recuperado de DOI:

Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., e Isaksen, A. (2015). External “energy” for regional industrial change? Attracting and anchoring of non-local knowledge for new path development. En 10th Regional Innovation Policies Conference. Karlsruhe (Germany), 15-16 October 2015. Karlsruhe, Germany: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT).

Trippl, M., e Otto, A. (2009). How to turn the fate of old industrial areas: A comparison of cluster-based renewal processes in Styria and the Saarland. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(5), 1217-1233. DOI:

Tukker, A., Charter, M., Vezzoli, C., Sto, E., e Andersen, M.M. (2007): System innovation for sustainability 1: Perspec-tives on radical changes to sustainable consumption and production.

Sheffield, England: Greenleaf. Weber, K.M., e Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037-1047. DOI: