John Dewey's theory of inquiry. Quantum physics, ecology and the myth of the scientific method
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The modern philosophy of science has not succeeded in defining conclusively what the scientific method consists in. On the contrary, scientific practice seems to consist in a methodological pluralism, a definition that connects with essential fragments of John Dewey's Logic, the Theory of Inquiry. For Dewey, even the forms of logic emerge from the problems defined in indeterminate situations. A historical example was the introduction of the notion of complementarity in physics, which allowed the interpretation of two confusingly paradoxical experiments in a coherent way. Dewey's thought demonstrates its relevance by helping us to define the pattern of inquiry. Methodological pluralism and the dependence of logic on research problems is not something that will happen, it is something that has happened and does happen in scientific practices.
Keywords:
Cited by
Article Details
References
Ayer, A. J. (Ed.) Logical positivism, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1959.
Bächtold, M. “Interpreting quantum mechanics according to a pragmatist approach”, Foundations of Physics, 38, 843 (2008).
Bitbol, M. Schrödinger’s philosophy of quantum mechanics, The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
Blum, L. A. Friendship, Altruism and Morality. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980.
Bohr, N. “Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics”, en P.A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher–Scientist, The Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. VII, Evanston, Illinois, 1949, pp. 201–241.
Bohr, N. Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. New York, John Wiley, 1958.
Bohr, N. Essays 1958-1962 on atomic physics and human knowledge. New York, Interscience Publishers, 1963.
Brown, M. J. “John Dewey’s logic of science”, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 2(2) (2012), 258-306.
Burtt, E. A. The metaphysical foundations of modern physical science: A historical and critical essay. New York, Dover publications, 2003.
Castellà, J. Origen e implicaciones filosóficas de las medidas cuánticas sin interacción. La filosofía de la física de M. Renninger, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 2016.
Dewey, J. Logic. The Theory of Inquiry. New York, Henry Holt & Co, 1938.
Faerna, A. M. Introducción a la teoría pragmatista del conocimiento, Madrid, Siglo XXI, 1996.
Gouinlock, J. “What is the legacy of instrumentalism? Rorty’s interpretation of Dewey”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 28(2) (1990), 251-269.
Hanson, N. R. Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1958.
Healey, R. “Quantum Theory: Realism or Pragmatism?”, Análisis. Revista de investigación filosófica, 5(1) (2018), 111-138.
Heisenberg, W. The physical principles of the quantum theory, New York, Dover Publications, 1949.
Heisenberg, W. Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science, London, Allen and Unwin, (1959) 1971.
Kline, M. Mathematics: The loss of certainty, New York, Oxford University Press, 1980.
Kuhn, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, (1962) 1996.
Lakatos, I. “History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions”, En Buck R.C., Cohen R.S. (eds.) PSA 1970. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 8, Springer, Dordrecht, 1971, pp. 99-136.
Maleeh & P. Amani, R. “Pragmatism, Bohr, and the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 27(4) (2013), 349-363.
Marion Young, I. “Impartiality and the civic republic”. In Feminism as critique: On the politics of gender. Cambridge, Polity Press in Association with Blackwell Publishers, 1987.
Maxwell, N. “A critique of Popper’s views on scientific method”, Philosophy of Science, 39(2) (1972), 131-152.
Naess, A. (1985). “The world of concrete contents”. Inquiry, 28(1-4) (1985), 417-428.
Nolan, L. (Ed.) Primary and secondary qualities: The historical and ongoing debate, Oxford UK, Oxford University Press, 2011.
Popper, K. The logic of scientific discovery, London and New York, Routledge, (1959) 2002.
Popper, K. Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics: from the Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery, London and New York, Routledge, (1982) 2000.
Psillos, S, “Rudolf Carnap’s Theoretical Concepts in Science”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 31(1) (2000), 151-172.
Puleo, A. H. “Perspectivas ecofeministas de la ciencia y el conocimiento La crítica al sesgo andro-antropocéntrico”, Daimon Revista Internacional De Filosofia, (2017), 41-54.
Rivadulla, A. “La filosofía de la ciencia hoy. Problemas y posiciones”, en J. M. Navarro Cordón (ed.), Perspectivas del pensamiento contemporáneo 2, Madrid, 2004, pp. 109-163.
Rivadulla, A. Meta, método y mito en ciencia, Madrid, Editorial Trotta, 2015.
Rorty, R. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1979.
Rorty, R. Consequences of pragmatism: Essays, 1972-1980, Minneapolis MN, University of Minnesota Press, 1982.
Rorty, R. Contingency, irony, and solidarity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Rorty, R. Essays on Heidegger and others: philosophical papers (Vol. 2), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Rorty, R. Philosophy as Cultural Politics: philosophical Papers (Vol. 4), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Shook, J. R. “Dewey’s Empirical Naturalism and Pragmatic Metaphysics.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 40(4) 2004, 731-742.
Speranza, A. Ecología profunda y autorrealización, Buenos Aires, Editorial Biblos, 2006.
Stapp, H. P. “The Copenhagen Interpretation”, American Journal of Physics, 40(8) 1972, 1098-1116.
Tafalla, M. “La apreciación estética de los animales: consideraciones estéticas y éticas”, Revista de bioética y derecho, 28 (2013), 72-90.
Valor, J. A. “Utilidad y objetividad en la investigación científica”, Revista de Filosofía, 31(2) (2006), 173-188.
Valor, J. A. “Una crítica pragmatista a la filosofía moderna, la realidad líquida”, Revista de discusiones filosóficas, 12(19) (2011), 199-221.
van Fraassen, B. C. Quantum mechanics: An empiricist view, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1991.
Velasco, A. “Ética del cuidado para la superación del androcentrismo: hacia una ética y una política ecofeministas”, CTS: Revista iberoamericana de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad, 11(31) (2016), 195-216
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Joaquín Fernández Mateo, Julia Jambrina Rodríguez, Corporate Sustainability and Sustainable Development Goals: innovation to fight against corruption , Revista Internacional de Comunicación y Desarrollo (RICD): Vol 4 No 15 (2021): Sustainable cities and communities (SDG 11)