Main Article Content

Dolors Perarnau Vidal
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Vol 38 No 1 (2019), Studies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/ag.38.1.5011
Submitted: 14-03-2018 Accepted: 31-05-2018 Published: 28-11-2018
Copyright How to Cite

Abstract

The objective of the paper is to do a tour of three moments of philosophical writing in which the phenomenon of limit or boundary of thought is brought to light in the discourse. In the first place, Kant, as an author of the productive notion of “Boundary [Grenze]” of reason as a condition and limit of thought; secondly, Hegel, as his maximum critic at the “assumption [Aufhebung]” of negation of Kant’s boundary; and, finally, Kierkegaard, whose contribution to the discussion of his predecessors consists in the “pathos [Lidenskab]” of the limit that Kant demarcates and Hegel surpasses, since, in the case of the Danish thinker, the limit of philosophy is at the same time paradox, i. e., something that cannot be known but only recognized, something that puts reason to its limit.
Cited by

Article Details

References

Blanchette, O., “The Silencing of Philosophy”, en International Kierkegaard Commentary: Fear and Trembling, and Repetition, Robert L. Perkins (ed.), Macon, Mercer University Press, 1993, pp. 29-65.

Caygill, H., Kant’s Dictionary, Oxford, Blackwell, 1995.

Clair, A., “Médiation et Répétition. Le lieu de la dialectiques kierkegaardienne”, Revue des sciences philosophiques et theologiques 59 (1975), 38-78.

Deleuze, G., Différence et Répétition, París, Universitaires de France, 1968.

Derrida, J., Marges de la philosophie, París, Les Éditions de Minuit, 1972.

Duque, F., Ciencia da Lógica, Volumen 1: La lógica objetiva, Madrid, Abada Editores / UA Ediciones, 2011.

Eisler, R. , “Grenze”, Kant Lexikon, París, Gallimard, 1994.

Faggioto, P., “‘Limiti’ e ‘Confini’ della conscenza humana secondo Kant. Commento al paragrafo 57 dei Prolegomini”, Verifiche 15 (1986), 231-242.

Franzini, E., Filosofia del sentimenti, Milán, Mondadori, 1997, pp. 98-170.

Gentile, A., Ai confini della ragione. La nozione di “limite” nella filosofia transcendentale di Kant, Roma, Studium 2003.

Kant, I., Kants Werke, Akademie Textausgabe, Berlín, Walter de Gruyter & CO., 9 vols., 1968.

__________. Crítica de la razón pura, Madrid, Alfaguara, 1978.

__________. Prolégomenos a toda metafísica futura que haya de poder presentarse como ciencia, ed. bilingüe, Madrid, Istmo, 1999.

Kierkegaard, S., Søren Kierkegaards Papirer, P. A. Heiberg, V. Kuhr e E. Torsting (eds.), 16 vols., Copenhaguen, Gyldendal, 1968-1978.

__________. Søren Kierkegaard Skrifter (SKS), Niels Jørgen Cappelørn, Joakim Garff, Johnny Kondrup, Alastair Mckinnon i Finn Hauberg Mortensen (eds.), 28 vols., Copenhaguen, Søren Kierkegaard Forskningcenteret, GAD, 1997-2012.

Hegel, G. W. F., Werke in zwanzig Bänden, Eva Moldenhauer i Karl Markus Michel (eds.), Francfort, Suhrkamp, 20 vols., 1969-1971.

__________. Enciclopedia de las ciencias filosóficas en compendio, Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 1999.

__________. Fenomenología del espíritu, Madrid, UAM /Abada, 2010.

__________. Ciencia de la lógica. Volumen 1: La lógica objetiva, Madrid, Abada Editores / UA Ediciones, 2011.

Illeterati, L., Figure del limite. Esperienze e forme della finitezza, Trento, Verifiche, 1996.

Moretto, A., “‘Limite’ e ‘analogia’ in alcuni aspetti della filosofia critica di Kant”, Vertifiche 15 (1986), 341-364.

Nymann Eriksen, N., Kierkegaard’s Category of Repetition, Kierkegaard Studies Monograph Series, vol. 5, Berlín, Walter de Gruyter, 2000.

Rigobello, A., I limiti del trascendentale in Kant, Milán, Silva, 1963.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Werkausgabe, 8 vols., Francfort, Suhrkamp, 1989.

__________. Tractatus logico-philosophicus, Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 1995.