Main Article Content

Germán Osvaldo Prósperi
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
Argentina
Biography
Vol 37 No 2 (2018), Studies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/ag.37.2.4392
Submitted: 31-10-2017 Accepted: 13-02-2018 Published: 27-04-2018
Copyright How to Cite

Abstract

There are thirteen instances of the term schema throughout the chapter “Le panoptism”, from Surveiller et punir. We consider that the meaning of this technical term found in Foucault’s work refers to the philosophy of Kant. Gilles Deleuze is one of the few thinkers who noticed the connection between the issue of power (specially, the concept of diagram) and the Kantian schema. Considering that the diagram is analogous to the Kantian schema and the schema —as in Kritik der reinen Vernunft— is a product of imagination, which is the Foucauldian term that corresponds to imagination? This question itself leads to an ontology. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that Foucauldian archeology and genealogy require a political and historical ontology of imagination, which has been partially outlined by Deleuze, but never thought in connection with the imagination.
Cited by

Article Details