Main Article Content

Jonathan Lavilla de Lera
Grupo de investigación "Eidos. Platonisme i Modernitat" Universidad de Barcelona
Spain
Biography
Vol 35 No 1 (2016), Studies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/ag.35.1.2381
Submitted: 03-02-2015 Accepted: 01-10-2015 Published: 09-11-2015
Copyright How to Cite

Abstract

The current paper offers a comparative analysis of the three speeches of Plato’s Phaedrus. The main aim is to show that, although in some passages of the dialogue Socrates’ words suggest the opposite, none of the speeches is totally wrong neither there is an unbridgeable contradiction among their theses. On the contrary, an attentive reading permits to understand that, even if the various theses proposed are partial, the dialogue develops them in such a way that impels the reader to integrate and surpass them in a more synthetic view of what éros and soul are.

http://dx.doi.org/10.15304/ag.35.1.2381

Cited by

Article Details