Main Article Content

María Teresa Gargiulo
Conicet-Uncuyo
Argentina
Vol 34 No 1 (2015), Studies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/ag.34.1.1721
Submitted: 10-03-2014 Accepted: 22-09-2014 Published: 03-11-2014
Copyright How to Cite

Abstract

The question dictated by the title is not minor. Because if we understand the Feyerabend´s conceptions of metaphysics we can elucidate the key that explains the continuity and logical coherence of his work. Among the critical studies that exist around Paul Feyerabend’s work there prevail those that underline a radical discontinuity between early and late version of his thought. All this contributes that we have a fragmented and incomplete view of a thinker who evolved until 1994, year of his death. Our intention is to present, across the confrontations that Feyerabend supports with his speakers, the different connotations and roles that the metaphysics acquire with regard to the science. We will worry for understanding the reasons for which our philosopher of the science move his different areas of discussion or critique through their different approaches to the problem of the relationship metaphysical
science; so that remains clear the unit or sense that exists in his critical review of the scientific rationality.

DOI  http://dx.doi.org/10.15304/ag.34.1.1721

Cited by

Article Details