Main Article Content

Instituto Universitario de Turismo e Desenvolvemento Económico Sostible (Tides). Universidade das Palmas de Gran Canaria.
Carmelo J. LEÓN
Instituto Universitario de Turismo e Desenvolvemento Económico Sostible (Tides). Universidade das Palmas de Gran Canaria.
Vol 27 No 2 (2018), Articles, pages 19-32
Submitted: 06-12-2018 Accepted: 06-12-2018 Published: 06-12-2018
Copyright How to Cite


O avellentamento demográfico e as novas estruturas familiares afectan significativamente
ás preferencias relativas á escolla do tipo de vivenda, e á escolla da zona de residencia.
Estes resultados teñen relevancia no deseño das políticas públicas en materia de vivenda a
efectos de axustar a oferta de vivenda ás características da demanda coa finalidade de
facer un uso máis eficiente dun recurso escaso como é o solo, prevendo unha maior
demanda asistencial nas cidades grandes non só por mor do avellentamento demográfico,
senón tamén, pola maior concentración dos maiores en torno ás cidades grandes.


The aging process and new family structures significantly affect the choice of housing type
and residence area. These results are relevant in the design of public policies, e.g. in order
to adjust the housing supply to the characteristics of the demand, so as to make a more
efficient use of scarce resources such as the ground and foreseeing a greater care demand
in big cities, not only due to the aging of the population, but also because of the greater
concentration of the elderly around big cities.

Cited by

Article Details


Barrios García J. y J. E. Rodríguez (2008): Housing demand in Spain according to dwelling type: microeconometric evidence. Regional Science and Urban Economics 38: 363377.

Beer A., D. Faulkner, C. Paris y T. Clower (2011): Housing Transitions Through the Life Course; aspirations, needs and policy. Bristol: The Policy Press.

Bell D. y A. Rutherford (2012): Long-term care and the housing market. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 59 (5):543-563.

Bourassa S. C. (1995): A model of housing tenure choice in Australia. Journal of Urban Economics 37: 161-175.

Bover O. (2010): “Housing purchases and the dynamics of housing wealth”. CEPR Discussion Paper Nº 8128, Banco de España. Working Paper 1036.

Bover O. y P. Velilla (2001): “Precios hedónicos de la vivienda sin características: el caso de las promociones nuevas”. Banco de España. Estudios Económicos nº73.

Bramley G. y D. Watkins (2016): Housebuilding, demographic change and affordability as outcomes of local planning decisions: exploring interactions using a sub-regional model of housing markets in England. Progress in Planning 104:1-35.

Brown J. N. y H. S. Rosen (1982): On the estimation of structural hedonic price models. Econometrica 50 (3): 765-768.

Buzar S., P. Ogden, R. Hall, A. Haase, S. Kabisch y A. Steinfiihrer (2007): Splintering urban populations: emergent landscapes of reurbanisation in four Europeans cities. Urban Studies 44 (4):651-677.

Castles F. (1998): The really big trade-off: home ownership and the welfare state in the new world and the old. Acta Politica 33(1): 5–19.

Dewilde C. (2008): Divorce and the housing movements of owner-occupiers: A European comparison. Housing Studies 23(6): 809–832.

Dura-Guimera A. (2003): Population deconcentration and social restructuring in Barcelona, a European Mediterranean city. Cities 20: 387-394.

Ermisch J. (1996): The demand for housing in Britain and population ageing: microeconmic evidence. Economica 63: 383-404.

Galster G., R. Andersson y S. Mustered (2010): Who is affected by neighbourhoood income mix?. Gender, age, family, employment and income differences. Urban Studies 47 (1): 167-168.

García J. y J. M. Raya (2011): Price and income elasticities of demand for housing characteristics in the city of Barcelona. Regional Studies 45 (5): 597-608.

Goerlich F. J., E. Reig y I. Cantarino (2016): “Construcción de una tipología rural/urbana para los municipios españoles”. Investigaciones Regionales-Journal of Regional Research 35:151-173.

González L. y F. Ortega (2013): Immigration and housing booms: evidence from Spain. Journal of Regional Science 53 (1):37-59.

Hendershott P. H, R. Ong, G. A. Wood y P. Flatau (2009): Marital history and home ownership: evidence from Australia. Journal of Housing Economics 18(1): 13–24.

INE (2015, varios años): Encuesta de Condiciones de Vida. Microdatos. Madrid.

Leishman C. (2009): Spatial change and the structure of urban housing sub-markets. Housing Studies 24 (5): 563-585.

Li W. y R. Yao (2006): "The Life-cycle effects of house price changes". Journal of Money Credit Bank 39 (6): 1375-1409.

McFadden D. (1978): “Modelling the choice of residential location”, in A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars, and J. Weibull (eds. ), Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, pp.: 75-96. North Holland: Amsterdam.

McFadden D. y K. Train (2000): Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Economics 15 (5):447-470.

Meen G. (2016): Spatial housing economics: a survey. Urban Studies 53(10):1987-2003.

Odgen P. y R. Hall (2000): Households, reurbanisation and the rise of living alone in the principal French cities 1975-1900. Urban Studies 37: 367-390.

Ong R., G. Wood y V. Colic-Peisker (2015): Housing older Australians: Loss of homeownership and pathways into housing assistance. Urban Studies 52(16):29793000.

Ottensmanna J. R., S. Payton y J. Man (2008): Urban location and housing prices within a hedonic model. The Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy 38 (1): 19-35.

Revelt, D. y Train, K. (1998): Mixed logit with repeated choices: Household’s choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80: 647-657.

Williams, H. (1977): On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment and Planning, 9A: 285-344.

Zhang J. (2004): A dynamic model of residential segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 28:147-170.