Main Article Content

Andrea Torrano
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba Instituto de Humanidades-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Argentina
Biography
Vol. 34 No. 1 (2015), Studies
https://doi.org/10.15304/ag.34.1.1594
Submitted: 2013-12-17 Published: 2014-11-03
How to Cite Cited by

Abstract

This article explores the notion of monster in Canguilhem’s and Foucault’s investigations. Canguilhem focuses on teratology studies, where monstrosity is a complex anomaly, and observes that anomaly is identified with abnormality. On the other hand, Foucault conceives monstrosity as a juridical concept (juridical-biological and juridical-moral). According to him the monster is a predecessor of the abnormal. Despite Foucault points out that the monster’s frame of reference is the law, we argue that the monster must be considered in relation to the norm. The monster is a biopolitical concept.

DOI  http://dx.doi.org/10.15304/ag.34.1.1594

Downloads

Downloads is not available yet

Article Details