PECULIARITIES OF IMPLEMENTING THE CONCEPT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY BY RUSSIA’S INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 23-09-2015

Main Article Content

IRINA MOROZOVA
Volgograd State Technical University
Russian Federation
Biography
SERGEY VOLKOV
Volgograd State Technical University
Russian Federation
Biography
Vol 23 No 4 (2014), Articles
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/rge.23.4.2794
Submitted: 23-09-2015 Accepted: 23-09-2015 Published: 23-09-2015
Copyright How to Cite

Abstract

The article analyses the features of implementing the concept of corporate social responsibility by Russian industrial enterprises. As the object of the analysis, the authors chose the Volgograd regional administrative office of OOO Lukoil-ENERGOSETI. Based on a wide range of statistical data on the level of CSR development in the region, the article reveals key features of industrial enterprises' corporate social responsibility.

 

Keywords:

Corporate social responsibility, industrial enterprise, charity, personnel, ecological safety.
Cited by

Article Details

References

Bakulina NV. 2007. Corporate social responsibility (as exemplified by Russia’s enterprises). Finances, Cash, Investments 3 : 26-38.

Blagov YE, Ivanova EA. 2009. Corporate social responsibility in Russia: lessons of the national report on social investments. Russian Journal of Management 1(7) : 3-24.

Burchakov MA. 2009. Establishing the system of corporate social reports: international experience and Russia. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice 8 : 36-43.

Krichevski NA, Goncharov SF. 2008. Corporate Social Responsibility. М.: Pashkov i К.

Kulkova VY, Safin IKh. Implementing corporate social responsibility in socio-economic regional development. National Concerns: Priorities and Safety 36 : 72-80.

Nikitina LM. Corporate social responsibility of Voronezh enterprises in the context of international and Russian tendencies of its development. National Concerns: Priorities and Safety 23 : 91-100.

Stepanova EN. 2012. Corporate social responsibility of businesses in Northern regions (as exemplified by Murmansk Region). National Concerns: Priorities and Safety 47 : 20-25.

The Structure of OOO LUKOIL-ENERGOSETI. 2013. http://www.es.lukoil.com/main/static.asp?art_id=2011 [21 December 2013]

Frolov DP, Rozhkov SA. 2013. Evolution of business social responsibility in Russia: logics, formats, factor of the World Trade Organization. National Concerns: Priorities and Safety 21 : 2-12.

Jenkins R, Pearson R, Seyfang G (eds). 2002. Corporate Responsibility and Labour Rights. Earthscan.

Kotler P, Lee N (eds). 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for your Company and your Cause. Wiley.

Wang L, Juslin H. 2013. Corporate social responsibility in the Chinese forest industry: understanding multiple stakeholder perceptions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 20(3) : 129–145. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.286

Steurer R, Martinuzzi A, Margula S. 2012. Public policies on CSR in Europe: themes, instruments, and regional differences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 19(4) : 206-227 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.264

Noronha C, Tou S, Cynthia MI, Guan JJ. 2013 Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: an overview and comparison with major trends. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 20(1) : 29-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1276

Zadek S. et al. 2005. Responsible Competitiveness: Corporate Responsibility Clusters in Action. AccountAbility.