Consequentialist arguments, contributorynegligence and evaluation of solutions in Criminal Law
Main Article Content
Vol. 31 (2011), Articles
Submitted: 2012-05-03
Published: 2012-05-03
Abstract
The system of the offences in the Spanish penal code aimed atprotecting the economic interests of consumers against fraud comprisesa first containment line against behaviours suitable to harm those interests,and a second line that protects against completed fraud. It is onlynatural that this system shows difficulties when the legal implicationsof the possible occurrence of danger and damage to personal assets arediscussed in detail, as is apparent in the course of this analysis. Thesolution to the concurrency issues of criminal law is being hinderedby the fact that in each of three offences of risk to the wealth of consumersboth the configuration of the types and the concurrency prospectsappear differently. This differential approach is not justified either bythe phenomenology of the behaviours respectively described or by thedegree of danger they imply in the economy life, since in all three casesis prohibited exposing a plurality of consumers to a risk to propertyfrom which the high probability of massive damage derives. This stateof affairs shows the need for rationalization in the sense of giving thethree offences uniform legislative approach.
Keywords:
Crimes against consumers, False advertising, Fraudulent gaining of investors, Unlawful Billing, Fraud
Downloads
Downloads is not available yet
Article Details
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- José Luis Serrano González de Murillo, The criminalization of child grooming in Spain and the "ne bis in idem" principle , Estudios Penales y Criminológicos: Vol. 32 (2012)
